Friday 31 May 2013


"The Jews will fight the Germans 
to the last drop of English blood".
By Anonymous
December 18, 2008

ED Wes Penre: This very respected and well researched (often first hand) correspondent wishes to be anonymous at this point to protect family and friends. He has had personal threats directed towards him because of his research. 

Rabbi Louis Jacobs was a very accomplished man and an advisor to Britain's cold war think tanks. He was an unusually moderate man and not a Christian hater as many rabbis are, and I truly believe this man with his depth of understanding and compassion to be the greatest of the modern rabbis.

I love Jewish humour with its clever self deprecation and he introduced me to the great comedian Harry Levine, of "shad dap harry" fame, and it was Harry before his death who told me so much of the wartime Jewish underground and its colossal achievements.
Many in the newspaper and TV industry subscribe to the Sannyanin, or Jewish Underground, and there is much talk presently of a plan to sue the Roman Catholic Church because it claims the church did not do enough to help Jews during WW II, plus 70 years interest on this money. The idea is to bankrupt the church and ruin it.
Charles Augustus Lindberg was an influential pacifist and celebrity aviator in thirties U S A and he was a thorn in the side of the warmongers who wanted Americas involvement in the war. Lindberg was warned many times to stop urging the US to stay out of the war, and Charles Augustus Lindberg Jr., the toddler son of the aviator was abducted on March 1st 1932 and murdered.

Harry Levine was not only a comedy writer for other comedians; he wrote propaganda for the wartime Rockefeller institution in Manhattan, and claimed inside knowledge that the kidnap and murder of the little boy was on their orders. A nice patsy was found in the name of Bruno Hauptman who was later electrocuted. Lindberg was among the large throng who believed in the mans innocence.

Rockefeller had 3000 agents who alongside William Stephenson of "a man called intrepid" fame working secretly to bring America into a war it did not want. Huge profits could be made, and indeed were; loans to Britain were finally paid back in 2006.

Henry Ford refused to take sides and was labelled and attacked as anti-Semitic.

The Hollywood screenwriters’ assoc, a communist front organisation, had its phones tapped and its mail opened, while President Roosevelt quietly condoned its activities, and when he was in a wheel-chair his wife Eleanor was blackmailed over her promiscuity by the Jewish underground working for Stalin.

Harry told me that Alger Hiss was kingpin to 100 spies round the huge Manhattan project, and that the Rosenbergs were still revered in Tel-Aviv today for their achievements.

Alexis Carrol had intimate links with the Rockefeller institute, and was concerned for his safety after giving statements which cross correlate with much of this and other illegal activities to the FBI.

I once saw Harry Levine give a charity show at a Jewish old folks home, and my stomach ached through laughing, it was often said he could have them laughing at a funeral. And that's just what happened with the Hindenburg tragedy, the giant German airship landing in the USA with its huge swastika on its stern. This was too much for some, and on March 16th 1937, it exploded on its arrival at Lakeside, New Jersey. Intricate searches after the tragedy showed no sign of a bomb, and Captain Ernest Lehmann kept an open mind until his death. Several Jewish pop songs and a short satirical film by Stan Cohen also claim it as an underground hit.

I asked Harry Levine if this was true and why?
He explained that after WW I Jews bought into Germany in a big way, houses, land, artwork jewellery all for knock down prices. 
Along came Mr. Hitler who took it all back for the German people, and he also took the economy out of Jewish control, so in 1933 the Jews began to emigrate to New York and London, where the underground was instructed to change their names, assimilate, infiltrate and influence.
Robert Maxwell, the publisher, was a classic case, and held a high position in the Jewish Underground. He claimed in a long talk at his beautiful home at Headingham Hall, that they then began fifth column activities to successfully push Britain and the U S A into a war with Germany. Using blackmail and bribery on Winston Churchill to achieve it, Herbert Morrison, the Home office minister, was overheard by an undercover informant to say;
"The Jews will fight the Germans 
to the last drop of English blood".
Sir Robert Mark, while assistant police commissioner, asked Scotland Yard detective John Morrison to investigate claims and supervise covert wire taps on Gerry Cohen, the London communist organiser, on Jewish underground and Soviet infiltration, manipulation and betrayal of the Labour party, and Mossad sources working in British newspapers said 13 British labour party members were under M.I.5 surveillance. Party chairman Tom Driberg was a senior underground activist of some notoriety with a taste in street boys.

Recent U S presidency contender John McCain, had a gambling addiction, and was both bailed out and blackmailed by Jack Abramoff, the underground A.O.I to get McCain to target Iran for Israel, whole conversations were wiretapped and stored at Forest Hill.

Hilary Clinton was secretly filmed in lesbian romps with what looks on film to be schoolgirls; President Clinton was honey-trapped by Monica Lewinsky, a Mossad plant, to toe the line.

Worldwide Israeli agents mainly from Mossad, use contaminated software and virus implants in a huge computer operation called "Horserace" to alter change and subvert intelligence data, mainly in the U S A.

Spy Jonathan Pollard claimed to D I A interrogators that Israel controlled British and U S foreign policy, particularly over Iraq. Military computer operators are known in Mossad documents as "black hat backers" and are building to manipulate U S and British soldiers as surrogate armies to attack Iran and Syria.

There are so many soviet FSB operatives in Britain now in the huge eastern European communities, imported in by Tony Blair, that British intell cannot cope. GCHQ have to switch listeners as mafia agents have dual Russian Israeli passports, and switch languages frequently.

The British were warned off investigating the murder of Alexander Litvinenko, when the chairman of the Joint Intelligence committee, (J.I.C.) Alex Allan was found poisoned and beaten.

The situation now, where underground figures such as Peter Mandleson and the Milliband brothers have senior British cabinet positions is very worrying, never have so many intelligence personnel been off work with depressive illnesses as they see Britain forced into the coming Armageddon, while we sleepwalk into oblivion.



For thirty-five years, the present writer wrote on and spoke about "Communism" without knowing what it was. After consulting hundreds of reference works on Communism, I had found not one mention of the fact that Communism was but one branch of the world revolutionary forces of the Masonic Order of Canaanites. We have previously pointed out that the members of the First Communist International were Lionel de Rothschild, Karl Marx, and Heinrich Heine. Not only did Karl Marx maintain close ties with the Jesuits and Freemasonry throughout his career; he was also directly related to the British aristocracy through his marriage to Jenny von Westphalen, a descendant of the Countess of Balcarras and Argyll, two of the oldest titles in England. 
ED Noor: Let us not forget that Marx was the scion of an old rabbinical family. As Elizabeth Dillings so eloquently described it, the Communism espoused by Marx was no more than the Talmud streamlined for gentiles.
The Countess had been governess to William of Orange before he invaded England and chartered the Bank of England. It was the Masonic connection which obtained a steady income for Karl Marx, through commissions for writing for New York newspapers. Lenin also maintained close Masonic ties during his years in Switzerland, before he returned to Russia to lead the Bolshevik Revolution.

In Switzerland, he had become the member of a secret Lodge under the name of "Ulianov Zederbaum." He received regular financial support, as well as occasional visits, from Sir Alfred Milner (founder of the Round Tables, la ~ the Council on Foreign Relations), and Lord Palmerston, foreign minister of England. Both Milner and PaImerston had attained the 33rd or revolutionary degree.

Meanwhile, the richest man in the world, the Czar of Russia, seemed helpless in the face of his country’s slow slide into anarchy. Long before the advent of Rasputin, his court had been rife with occultists. The Tribune de Geneve headlined a dispatch on December 21, 1902,
"RUSSIA: An Occultist at Court. The Daily Mail correspondent at Odessa telegraphed that paper the real facts concerning the occultist Philippe’s presence at the Tzar's court. Philippe has gained great influence over the Czar."
The dispatch further stated that Philippe Nizier of Lyons had been presented to Nicholas by Grand Duke Nicolas Nicolaevitch. Earlier, in Lyons, Nizier had been sued for the unlawful practice of medicine. A French doctor, Gerard Encausse, had written voluminously on Kabbalah and magic. He had been introduced by Philippe to the Grand Duke. Encausse wrote his treatises on magic under the name of "Papus." 

The Swiss Gazette noted, December 20, 1902,
"Few people know that there exists in Paris a kind of small University of Occultism, where students register, examinations are passed, and academic degrees conferred. For instance, one can obtain a diploma of Bachelor of Occult Science, or Doctor in Kabbalah. Papus is President and organizer."
Thus, the occult influence at the Court of Czar Nicholas is traced directly to a school of the occult in Paris. It is not too fanciful to conjecture that this school operates with the backing of the Grand Orient of Paris, since Freemasonry is always concerned with the occult. The Czar's later inability to act decisively in times of crisis, which led directly to the downfall of his government, may have been due to drugs or hypnotism.
The world's most powerful autocrat was described by observers as “remarkably passive" and unable to take direct action when his regime was threatened with revolution. Indeed King Louis had reacted in much the same way at the onset of the French Revolution during the weeks before he was deposed and sent to the guillotine. It is difficult to believe that such absolute autocrats would meekly resign themselves to "the will of the people" and go unresisting to their deaths.
Apparently at the mercy of the occult influences at his court, Czar Nicholas was arrested, and a Provisional Government was set up. This government was headed by Kerensky, a 32d degree Mason, who had been chosen as head of the Provisional Government by Josef Sliozberg, the Grand Master of the International Order of B'Nai B'Rith in Russia.
Kerensky had only one mission; to hold the fort until Lenin arrived on the sealed train from Switzerland.
After the Bolshevik Revolution, Kerensky was permitted to peacefully emigrate to the United States, where he became a well-paid lecturer at leading universities. The Masonic Order of Canaanites always takes care of its own.

Princess Paley, wife of the Grand Duke Paul, stated that the English Ambassador at St. Petersburg, Sir George Buchanan, fomented and directed the Russian Revolution on direct instructions from Lloyd George, head of the Liberal Party in England.

The Bolsheviks were provided with ample funds for their takeover of Russia. On September21, 1917, Trotsky received a telegram from Stockholm:
"The management of the Bank of Max Warburg & Co. informed him that a current account had been opened for him at Stockholm for the purposes of his undertaking."
Trotsky had previously been presented with $10,000 in cash by the Rockefellers when he sailed from New York; other funds were forwarded to him from Berlin through the Disconto Gesellschaft, the Nya Bank, and the Siberian Bank, among other intermediaries, such as Helphand Parvus, Ganetsky, Koslousky, and Krassin. After the Revolution, Krassin went back to work for Siemens, the giant German electric company; as Russian representative, he was supported by Hugo Stinnes, Felix Deutsch, manager of A.E.G., and by Walter Rathenau.

Although all of the Czar's enormous deposits in foreign banks was retained by those banks without payment to any member of his family, a small portion of his Russian holdings were set aside by the new Bolshevik government as a secret fund which was exercise final control in the Soviet Government during the ensuing decades. This trust was composed of Dzerzhinsky, founder of the Cheka, the British secret agent Sidney Reilly, and W. Averell Harriman. The trust was a continuation of the Parvus fund which had brought Lenin to power, an operation which had been directed by the influential behind-the-scenes figure, the Venetian Count Volpi diMisurata, a black nobility figure who had put Mussolini in power, orchestrated the numerous Balkan Wars, and secretly directed the Russian Revolution.

Oddly enough, the Bolshevik Revolution was greeted with enthusiastic approval of many of the world’s leading financiers. One of the most prominent of their number, Jacob Schiff, senior partner of Kuhn, Loeb Co., New York, telegraphed his greetings, as recounted in the New York Times, March 19, 1917: "A persistent foe of the tyrannical autocracy, the merciless persecutors of my co-religionists, may I congratulate through you the Russian people upon what they have now so wonderfully achieved and wish you and your colleagues in the new government every success." The Minister, Milioukoff, a long-time friend of Schiff, replied, "We are united in hatred and antipathy to ancient regimes now overthrown." Here again is a direct quote from the Will of Canaan "hate your masters."

One of the most misunderstood events in history is the Allied "invasion" of Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution. This "invasion" again was featured recently in the Soviet Press as urgent reason not to "trust" the United States. In fact, the Allied troops were sent to Russia to divert the successful Counter Revolution of the White forces, and at the same time, to give the Red Army propagandists, principally Trotsky, a rallying cry to the faltering Red campaign, that "Mother Russia" was being invaded by "foreign troops."

This proved to be an irresistible call to the Russian peasants, who immediately rallied behind the Red Army and gave them total victory. In fact, several divisions, mostly British and American, were sent to Siberia, where they remained for a year and a half, without participating in any action. None of the troops had any idea of what they were doing there; they returned home as mystified as when they had departed. Had they been assigned to “invade" Russia, of course, they would have landed on the European coast and marched straight toward Moscow, which could have been easily taken by these well-armed and trained divisions.
They had actually been sent to Siberia to betray the White Russians. This manoeuvre was exposed in the New York Times, February 15, 1920, 

"when Vladivostok was liberated from the Kolchak faction." "There is a pronounced pro-American feeling evident. Revolutionary leaders mounted the steps of buildings across the street, making speeches calling the Americans real friends, who, at a critical time, saved the present movement."
The "mystery" of the American military presence in Russia was never a mystery to its secret Masonic Canaanite backers. The three directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York who were financing the Bolshevik effort realized that under Trotsky the Red Army was losing the war.

Its orgy of senseless terrorism and slaughter had turned the peasantry against the "liberators," and the White Army was gaining daily in support. To reverse the situation, the Federal Reserve Bank directors ordered the Allied troops into Russia. Quartered near the Kolchak forces, they gave the impression that they were there to support the White faction. The Russian people were given to understand that the Allied forces were sent to restore the old autocracy. The press of America and Britain now united the Russian peasantry behind the revolutionaries, and Kolchak's army was soon in full retreat. This was the explanation of the "pro-American feeling" in Vladivostok. The Allied presence in Siberia ensured the triumph of the Red Army and the imposition of a brutal dictatorship on the people of Russia.

There is ample documentation for the subsequent acts of terrorism which horrified the Russian people and permanently turned them against the Bolsheviks. The American Rohrbach Commission reported on some of the revolutionary atrocities:
"The whole cement floor of the execution hall of the Cheka of Kiev was flooded with blood; it formed a level of several inches. It was a horrible mixture of blood, brains, and pieces of skull. All the walls were bespattered with blood. Pieces of brains and of scalps were sticking to them.

“A gutter of 25 centimetres wide by 25 centimetres depend about 10 meters long was along its length full to the top with blood. Some bodies were disembowelled, others had limbs chopped off, and some were literally hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out of their heads the face and neck and trunk were covered with deep wounds.

“Further on, we found a corpse with a wedge driven into its chest. Some had no tongues. In a corner, we discovered a quantity of dismembered arms and legs belonging to no bodies that we could locate."
Once the White Russian threat of retribution had gone, the Bolsheviks unleashed the full fury of their Canaanite bloodlust. They converted the entire nation of Russia into a gigantic concentration camp, in order to slowly torture and kill the remaining descendants of the people of Shem, who had ruled them for one thousand years. 

Solzhenitsyn later informed an incredulous world that the soviets had murdered sixty-six million people in Russia from 1918 to 1957. He cited Cheka Order No. 10, issued on January 8, 1921:
"To intensify the repression of the bourgeoisie."
This, of course, meant the people of Shem. Under this order, the concentration camps were established on a permanent basis. Typical of the bosses of these camps was Lazar Kogan, who calmly watched thousands of slave labourers die during his stint as overseer of the construction of the White Sea Canal. He greeted a new inmate with this incredible statement,
"I believe that you personally are not guilty of anything. But, as an educated person, you have to understand that social prophylaxis was being widely applied." 

"Social prophylaxis" was a typical Canaanite euphemism for the massacre of the people of Shem. The prospective victims were no longer considered to be human, but only as corpses waiting to be tossed onto the scrap heap. They were known simply as "zeks," slang for the Russian term for prisoner, "zakluchenny."

After a half-century of unequalled barbarism, the "Russian experiment" was exposed in all its horror by Solzhenitsyn. He writes of the camps,
"Many camp points were known for executions and mass graves; Orotukan, and Polyarny Spring, and Svistoplas, and Annuskha, and even the agricultural camp Dukcha, but the most famous of all on this account were the Zolotisty Goldfields. At Zolotisty they used to summon a brigade from the mine face in broad daylight and shoot the members down one after another. (And this was not a substitute for night executions, they took place, too.)

When the chief of Yuglag, Nikolai Andreyevich Aglanov, arrived, he liked, at line-up, to pick out some brigade or other which had been at fault for something or other and order it to be taken aside. And then he used to empty his pistol into the frightened, crowded mass of people, accompanying his shots with happy shouts. The corpses were left unburied. "

Solzhenitsyn goes on for many pages to describe the horrors of which our liberals knew nothing,
“But some transports of condemned zeks arrived too late, and they continued to arrive with five to ten people at a time. A detachment of killers would receive them at the Old Brickyard Station and lead them to the old bathhouse to a booth lined with three or four layers of blankets inside. There the condemned prisoners were ordered to undress in the snow and enter the bath naked. Inside, they were shot with pistols. In the course of one and a half months about two hundred persons were destroyed in this way. The corpses were burned in the tundra."
Solzhenitsyn continues,
"A. B. ______v has told how executions were carried out at Adak ~ a camp on the Pechora River. They would take the opposition members 'with their things' out of the camp compound on a prisoner transport at night. And outside the compound stood the small house of the Third Section. The condemned men were taken into a room one at a time, and there the camp guards sprang on them. Their mouths were stuffed with something soft and their arms were bound with cords behind their backs. Then they were led out into the courtyard, where harnessed carts were waiting. The bound prisoners were piled on the carts, from five to seven at a time, and driven off to the 'Gorka,' the camp cemetery. On arrival they were tipped into big pits that had already been prepared and buried alive. No, not out of brutality. It has been ascertained that when dragging and lifting them, it was much easier to cope with living people than with corpses. The work went on for many nights at Adak."
Solzhenitsyn is not the only person to describe life in the Soviet concentration camps. Consider the following description of life in a gulag: Sergei Grigoryants says that the prisoners are awakened at 5:30 a.m. and served a watery fish soup and brown bread for breakfast; at 10:30 the main meal, which is watery soup; the dinner is porridge. Grigoryants says that the prisoners are constantly tortured through lack of food and the cold in the cells.

Soviet law requires that the temperature in the cells be at least 64.4 degrees Fahrenheit; this is solemnly tested by the camp inspectors. They bring an electric heater into the cell, turn it on until the temperature reaches 64.4 degrees, make the appropriate notation on their report, and then take the heater to the next cell. The temperature then returns to its usual forty degrees. A lamp is kept constantly burning all night in the cells, so that the prisoners never really rest.

Grigoryants says that some 500,000 prisoners a year are released to return to Soviet society, and that their presence has a very alarming effect upon the entire country.

Here again, how pertinent is this report? It was published as an interview with Grigoryants in the New York Times of February 22, 1987!

It would be logical to suppose that this Socialist society was built on the confiscated fortune of the late Czar Nicholas II, but this is not the case. In 1913, the Czar was undoubtedly the richest man in the world, with a personal fortune amounting to some thirty billion dollars in 1913 dollars. He personally owned 150,000,000 acres of land, and had some 30,000 servants, 500 automobiles in his personal fleet, 6,000 horses, 2 yachts, a personal gold reserve of one billion dollars in the Imperial Bank, with five hundred million dollars worth of jewels, including the $200,000 Great Mogul diamond, a Crown valued at $75 million and 32,000 diamonds. He controlled one-sixth of the surface of the entire globe. 

ED Noor: Jakob Schiff, childhood friend of the Rothschilds (they shared a house when very young) was prime financier and organizer of the Bolshevik takeover of Russia. It was he, personally, who gave the orders to assassinate the Tzar and his family. The Rothschild vendetta against the Romanovs was long and deadly. They attempted and succeeding in assassinating several Tzars prior to this final family to whom they felt extra contempt for his outspoken disgust of the plans for the JWO/NWO.

On the night of November 6, 1917, at 2:00 a.m., Red Guards drove a truck to the Imperial Bank and removed all of the Romanoff gold and jewels. Much of the gold was later shipped directly to Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York. We may recall that the senior partner of Kuhn, Loeb Co., Jacob Schiff had put up some $20 million of his own funds to finance the Revolution. Apparently it was a good investment. Victor Hammer fenced many of the Crown jewels to collectors in Europe and the United States.

The Dowager Empress Maria escaped with the considerable jewels in her personal collection. Both King George V and King Christian of Denmark repeatedly tried to get her to "entrust" her jewels to them for "safekeeping" or at least for" appraisal." She steadfastly refused, knowing that she probably would never see them again. When she died in 1928, special agents seized the jewels and immediately whisked them to Buckingham Palace. Her more important pieces later were seen in Queen Mary's personal collection.

After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently prepared for further outbreaks by transferring some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J. P.Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar's sequestered funds.
Thus the Romanoff family actually owns the controlling interest in the Federal Reserve Banks today!
Other deposits of the Czar included $35-50 million in the Bank of England, $25 million in Barclay’s, $30 million in Lloyd's Bank, $100 million in the Bank of France, $80 million in the Rothschild Bank in Paris, and $132 million in the Mendelssohn Bank in Berlin. Since 1917, a cloud has hung over the financial structure of the Western democracies, threatening their jerry-built financial structure, the fear that some court somewhere, might eventually rule that the Czar's funds must be turned over to the rightful heirs.
This would affect not only the ownership of the Federal Reserve Bank stock, but, with payment of interest, would mean the end of our ten largest financial institutions.
Does anyone wonder why the United States government, which is under the total direction of the Big Ten Banks, continually makes every effort to finance and feed the crumbling Soviet empire? Can anyone predict the financial calamity which would ensue if the Romanoffs were restored to the throne of Russia, and asked for their money back, or if they got a court ruling anywhere in the world to that effect?

This catastrophe loomed on the horizon at one point. The New York Times of July 20, 1929, reported on the progress of a lawsuit brought by the Czar's mother and thirty-two of the Romanoff heirs against Guaranty Trust and National City Bank. F. Dudley Kohler, an attorney representing James Egan, Public Administrator, issued the following Legal Notice which appeared in the Law Journal,
"Notice is hereby given to all persons, corporations, banks, trustees having assets, deposits and securities of the late Nicholas II, that a statement and account of same is forthwith demanded, and in the event that no such statement of account is rendered, all such persons will be held responsible for the amounts, plus interest and the cost of discovery proceedings."
Both the case and Kohler then disappeared from the pages of the New York Times. Apparently no account or statement was ever given. To have done so would have provided legal evidence of the debt, and would have made repayment inevitable. Charles Recht, counsel for the Soviet Union, retained Edward H. Fallows to represent the Soviet government, but no further legal proceedings are to be found.

Nevertheless, the Romanoff demand did have tremendous repercussions. The threat of a tremendous withdrawal from two of New York's most over-extended and precarious banks caused an underground pressure against call money, or cash, on Wall Street, which then precipitated the Crash of 1929.

Even though the Masonic Canaanites controlled the courts in the United States, they could not be certain that the Romanoffs might not find a court in some other country which would grant them a judgment, or even an injunction against Guaranty Trust, a J. P. Morgan controlled bank, and National City Bank, the Rothschild and Rockefeller bank in New York. This threat, coming at the very height of the stock market boom of the 1920s, cast a pall over the wheelings and dealings of the speculators, and caused immediate pressure on short term funds, resulting in the Great Depression.

To avoid such threats in the future, Roosevelt-Litvinoff agreements were concluded between the United States and Russia in 1933 and 1934. In these agreements, the United States unilaterally recognized all claims of the Soviet Government to funds of the Imperial Russian Government. Whether this could be made applicable to the funds of Czar Nicholas has never been tested in court.

The Roosevelt-Litvinoff Pact also put the diplomats of the world on notice that Roosevelt had now formalized the extended support formerly rendered to the Soviet Government by "private interests” such as the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and J. P. Morgan Co. since 1917. Not all of this was from private banks. It included a gift of $20 million from Woodrow Wilson's Special War Fund which had been voted him by Congress; the money was dispatched to Russia by way of Elihu Root.

The Red Cross, Kuhn, Loeb. Co. and many other Wall Street firms had been active in financing the Soviet Government; henceforth, that burden would be borne directly by the American taxpayers, through subsidies provided to the Communists by the U.S. Government.

The dedicated financial support of the Communists by the world's leading bankers did not go unnoticed. Francois Coty, founder of the perfume firm, wrote, in "Tearing Away the Veils,” published by Revue Internationale des Secret Societies, 1930, Paris,
"The terms, Capitalism, Socialism, Communism, are so many themes distributed among well-paid demagogues to create confusion in the minds of the masses destined to become slaves.

Universal Slavery is the immediate aim of the Bleichroder Group which they strive to attain through the medium of a new war." TheBleichroders were the German representatives of the House of Rothschild.
Wyndham Lewis, who during the First World War had co-edited Blast and Vortex with Ezra Pound, wrote in his book, "Count Your Dead; They Are Alive!",
"A Rothschild or a Morgan makes his money in a very different way from a Nuffield or a Ford. The former deals in money as a commodity. His business is essentially allied to that of a moneylender. He makes nothing. He toils not, neither does he spin. But for all that, he is no lily, as a rule!

“The latter, on the other hand, of the Nuffield-Ford type, are creative in the sense that they do at least make something. Without Loan Capital there would be no Communism. The straight Bolshevik ~ say a Pollitt or a Strachey ~ though perfectly ideological ~ does not understand Capitalism. Even Henry Ford is only a gigantic kulak [Ezra Pound called him 'the epitome of the American hired hand.' Ed.], and of all things the Marxist hates most on earth he hates the kulak most.

“With Loan Capital; on the other hand, he has many affinities. Indeed, if Loan Capital were allowed to proceed on its way without interference, it would automatically result in Communism. I felt that the Soviets were altogether too thick with the Capitalists. I remarked that these Lords of Capital who do not seem to hate Communism quite as much as we would expect do not belong to us.
“We get nothing out of these people, but they get a great deal out of us. The richer they become-and they are a very few-the poorer we become."
Wyndham Lewis' observations may have been inspired by the activities of the Left Book club, which was directed by Victor Gollancz during the 1930s, featuring Harry Pollitt, head of the Communist Party of Great Britain, John Strachey of the Daily Worker, and Claud Cockburn, alias Frank Pitcairn, editor of The Week, who was special correspondent for the Daily Worker at the Spanish Civil War battlefields. 

Gollancz headed many front groups, such as Friends of the Soviet Union, Young Communists League, and Committee for the Victims of Fascism.
No intellectual has ever started a Committee for the Victims of Communism.
After the Bolshevik Revolution, there were abortive Communist uprisings in Germany and Hungary. The German revolution was quickly eradicated, but Bela Kun, in Hungary, actually established a short-lived Communist Reign of Terror. His mass murders and lunatic orgies (he had formerly been a mental patient) left the nation bankrupt and devastated.
When a legal government was restored, the Hungarian government published the archives of the Masonic Lodges, proving that the "Communist Revolution" had entirely originated as the work of the Freemasons. The Hungarian government then closed down all Masonic Lodges throughout the country.
The Hungarian government later sought a loan from the United States to rebuild their shattered economy.
Their officials were promptly informed that the "United States government" made only one stipulation before granting the loan-that all the Masonic Lodges be restored and reopened.

This proves that even in the 1920s, the Masonic Canaanites had already assumed full control over the government of the United States.
Another great slaughter of the people of Shem during the twentieth century occurred during the Spanish Revolution (1936-1939). The massacres were significant because they were a war of the Canaanites against Christians, and because they took place on the Iberian Peninsula (from Heber, of the people of Shem).

The slaughter of Christians in Spain began with the transfer of Soviet Russia's former peace delegate at Geneva, Rosenberg, also known as Moses Israelssohn, with his staff of one hundred and forty trained killers to the office of the Ambassador to Spain in August of 1936. This cadre of highly trained specialists in torture and murder inaugurated one of the most brutal campaigns in the history of Europe. 
Antichristian communist Jews and their dupes and acolytes destroy Christian churches in the Spanish civil war

Priests and nuns butchered by the Jews and acolytes in the Spanish Civil War
Their atrocities were largely ignored by the world because the corps of journalists covering the Civil War were totally dedicated to the success of Communism; they only reported news which was unfavourable to the "fascists," as the Canaanites had contemptuously termed their opponents since the Romans had destroyed their world capital at Carthage.

The Rosenberg murder teams were euphemistically called "World Revolutionary Movement Purification Squads." Their work of purification consisted mainly of massacring priests, nuns, choirboys, and women, these being groups which were least likely to offer any armed resistance.

Arthur Bryant, in his well-documented "Communist Atrocities in Spain," tells of one murder squad which went to the Dominican Convent in Barcelona and respectfully informed the Mother Superior that "because of possible mob violence," the nuns should accompany the squad to a place of safety.

They were then taken to the suburbs and murdered. The Communist leader justified his action as follows, "We needed the building. We didn't want to muss it up before we occupied it." 
Decayed corpses of nuns exhumed from graveyards by depraved Communists and mocked and degraded during the Spanish Civil War

E. M.Godden, in his book, "Conflict in Spain," says, p. 72, "During the last week of July, 1936, the bodies of nuns were exhumed from their graves and propped up outside the walls of their convents.

Obscene and offensive placards were attached to their bodies."
In Madrid, it was estimated that one-tenth of the population of Spain was murdered by the Communist "purification" squads by 1939.
DeFonteriz in "Red Terror in Madrid," describes how Cheka murder teams organized by Dimitrov and Rosenberg carried out a program of torture and killing so obscene that it cannot be reprinted here. 

Early in World War lI, Soviet murder teams captured 15,000 Polish officers, the most educated and responsible element in the population; they were never seen again. They were taken to three KGB-operated camps, Starbiesk, Kozielsk, and Ostashkov, where they were systematically murdered and dumped into unmarked graves. When the German army captured this area, known as Katyn Forest, they were led to the graves. 
At the Nuremberg Trials, the Soviets claimed that the Germans had committed these massacres; however, a Congressional Committee reported on July 2, 1952, that the Soviet NKVD had committed the massacres, which had been planned personally by Stalin as early as the fall of 1939.
The domination of the people of Shem by the Masonic Canaanites always results in an aura of total hopelessness; all justice, all honour, and all hope for the future now disappears. The eminent journalist, Don Cook, states in his book "Floodtide in Europe," that all journalists who go to Communist countries are struck by the "smell of Communism." 

"Worst of all to me was the peculiar and unmistakable smell of Russia and the Communist world which pervaded Leipzig. Everyone who has ever set foot in the Soviet Union knows that smell-a stale, heavy, unwashed smell." He calls it "the smell of old lavatories, carbolic soap, unwashed bodies." The Soviets have never bothered to produce such necessities as telephone books, soap, and toilet tissue in their "Socialist economy." 

Because it is an almost total waste of the energies and talents of its captive people, the Soviet Union can exist only by massive infusions of capital from the Western democracies. Few Americans realize how much of the money extorted from their wages by the Internal Revenue Service is transferred directly to the Federal Reserve Banks and from there to Switzerland, where it is transferred to five Soviet banks.

A defector from the Soviet Union reported in the New York Journal American, March 2, 1964, that of a remittance of $1,200,000 sent by the United States government to the CIA office in Vienna; the fund was distributed as follows: one-third to the Soviet Secret finance the Communist Party of the USA. Since World War II, when the OSS was handing out gold to the Communists in Italy, the process has become more formalized. James Angleton, head of covert action in the CIA and former CIA chief in Italy, set up organizations in which funds we re-channeled to Masonic groups in Italy, the foremost being P-2, which included most of the leading Italian government figures and businessmen; P-2 was penetrated by Andropov after he took over the KGB.

Lord Sackville of England had introduced Freemasonry to Italy in 1733; it became the vehicle through which the British Secret Service "unified" Italy through Garibaldi and Mazzini to produce "the new Italy." The Italian Under Secretary of State, alarmed at the control which the Freemasons exercised over the Italian government in 1913, called for a law forbidding Masons from holding any sensitive office, "compromised by any hidden and therefore uncontrollable tie, and by any motive of suspicion or lack of trust by the public." The measure was never passed, and the unfortunate Under Secretary disappeared from his office.
However, a decade later, Mussolini did outlaw the Masonic Lodges in Italy, causing the Canaanites to scream worldwide imprecations against "the brutal dictator" and "fascism."
Today, the "Red Billionaire," Jean-Baptiste Doumeng of France, carries on the vital work of feeding the helpless Soviet Union with the finest produce of the European "free democracies." He is a partner with Guy de Rothschild in distributing vegetables, the firm Sragri. Doumeng also directs the firms Inter-Agra and SOCOPA, which recently furnished one million tons of soft wheat to the Soviet Union at far below market price. Doumeng regularly ships meat and butter to the Communists at prices one fourth of those which are charged European consumers.

The Soviet Union frequently reships these commodities back for resale at twice the price paid for them, thus gleaning hard currency from the European economies. None of this would be possible except for the international power of the Masonic Order of Canaanites

Thursday 30 May 2013



The danger of the past was that men became slaves. The danger of the future is that men may become robots ~ Erich Fromm, American educator, graduate of the Franklin School of Applied Marxist Theory“The most potent weapon of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.” ~ Steven Biko
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." ~ Edward Bernays
Midnight in the Basement, painting by MK Ultra surivor Lynn Shirmer

By Ellen P. Lacter, Ph.D.

Installation of mind control programming relies on the capacity to dissociate, which permits the creation of new walled-off personalities to “hold” and “hide” programming. Already dissociative children are prime “candidates” for programming. Alternatively, very young children may be made dissociative by trauma-based programming. 

The extreme abuse inflicted on young children in intra-familial satanic and abusive witchcraft cults reliably causes dissociation. Children in these cults are programmed to the extent that the cult’s leaders understand mind control programming.

Organized and sophisticated abuser groups with world-power or organized crime agendas infiltrate these cults to gain access to these readily-programmable children. In exchange for the privilege of being allowed to install self-serving programs in these children, the organized abuser group provides the cult parent with a large fee (thousands of dollars), favour, or information, such as some of its programming secrets.

1. Psychic driving (Film, “The Sleep Room”, about CIA funding of Ewen Cameron, MD in the 1950s)

2. Unidimensional edicts communicated during severe abuse, convincing the affected personalities that the abuse will re-occur if the programmed mandate is broken. The most common simple programs are commands to never remember (re-associate into consciousness) the abuse and never disclose the abuse.

3. Pronouncements; claims, curses, covenants, etc., paired with abuse, that convince personalities they are controlled by evil entities, or forever malevolently defined as., e.g., forever evil, physically or mentally ill, socially devalued and isolated, sexually enslaved, a murderer, a cult member, a witch, etc.

4. Examples of process: “The first five steps of discipline” Svali, 1999, see

Moderately to Very Complex Programming
It has been my unfortunate experience to have been forced to conclude that sophisticated abuser groups within the United States of America are using torture to install complex mind control programming in our children in order to further their own political or religious agendas (See Hersha, L; Hersha, C., Griffis, D., & Schwarz, T. (2001) Secret weapons: Two sister’s terrifying true story of sex, spies, and sabotage. Far Hills, New Jersey: New Horizon Press, and Ross, C.A. (2000) Bluebird: Deliberate creation of multiple personality by psychiatrists. Richardson Texas: Manitou Communications).

This involves:
1. Torture involving states of extreme pain and terror, to the point of near-death, is required to install mind control programming. These states are induced through electroshock, toxins that cause pain or temporary paralysis, assault, painful bondage or pressure, rape,, extreme cold (submersion in ice water is common), heat, burning suffocation, near-drowning, spinning, hanging, inversion, exposure to torture, mutilation, or murder of others, and/or prolonged isolation, starvation, dehydration, or sensory deprivation. States of despair, self-hatred, paranoia, and global distrust of humanity, are also effective. These are induced through forcing the child to hurt or kill others, often loved ones and pets, sexual humiliation, convincing the child that all important attachment figures are abusers, and convincing the child that he or she is now controlled and overseen by surgically implanted monitoring devices or “spiritual assignments” of demons, malevolent spirits, curses, hexes, vexes, claims, etc.

2. Children must be very young in order for mind control programming to be initially installed, under 4 or 5 years of age. Modifications to the original programming can be made later.

3. One of the central functions of most mind control programs is to cause the victim to physically and psychologically re-experience the torture used to install the programming should she or he act in violation of the programmed commands. The re-experience of the original torture often includes somatic manifestation of the original injuries, such as bruising and swelling, though not to the degree of the original injury.

4. The most complex programs consist of personalities buried deep in the unconscious mind perceiving themselves, visually (in images) and somatically (in experiences of pain, suffocation, electroshock, etc.), to be attached to, or trapped within, “structures”, such as buildings, devices of torture, machines, containers, etc. These structures serve as containers for the programmed commands, messages, and information.

5. Mind control continues to control the victim’s thoughts and actions for decades, often for life, with no conscious awareness of the programming or of the personalities under its control, usually completing programmed actions unconsciously, sometimes feeling only a conscious compulsion to do, or not do, something. Survivors of organized abuse who re-associate their history of abuse usually begin to recover their memories between 30 and 50 years of age. It generally takes many more years for the survivor to become aware of the mind control programming and its ongoing effects on her or him.

6. The commands and structures installed during torture, and the detailed recollection of the torture itself, remain amazingly stable and fixed over time, from the toddler years until at least middle age, with incredibly little deterioration of memory (stored information) over time. The “memory capacity” in the programmed unconscious mind is enormous, holding vast amounts of detailed information, including lengthy “strings” of encoded information that could never be stored in conscious awareness.

7. Program “triggers”, “cues”, and “access codes” easily allow the programmer to regain access to the programmed personalities or program “structures” to install or change commands, messages, and information, and to retrieve information, all out of the victims’ awareness.

8. Programming overrides the victim’s free will and beliefs. Programmed people follow commands and perform actions that are in clear violation of their free will, moral principles, and spiritual convictions.

9. Programmers gain access to victims of other groups and deliberately “program over” competitor group’s programming to dominate the behaviour of the person

10. Such programming exists in an alarming number of people

11. Attempting to remove or disable it without great expertise “sets off” programmed self-destruction and negative health/mental health consequences, all by the programmers’ intentions.
ED Noor: Certain words can be installed to trigger self-destruction in most victims. 

It is the responsibility of all clinicians working with highly dissociative and ritually abused people to research this topic and proceed with extreme caution.

Some Indicators of Mind Control Programming
A. Repetitive statements that seem robotic, or do not make sense in the context of the dialogue. They may make repetitive, robotic statements that do not make sense in the context of dialogue, e.g., “I want to go home”, a common programmed statement intended to keep them obedient to the abuser group and reporting to their abusers. Specific songs may be compulsively sung for similar programmed purposes.

B. Compulsive or ritualized behaviours, especially self-mutilation, singing the same song

C. Fearful reactions to benign stimuli, such as colors, shapes, cartoon characters, lights, brands of food. Victims also usually experience intense or odd reactions to benign stimuli that were used in their programming. For example, they may have been programmed to remember to forget every time they see an apple, or to remember they are being watched every time they hear a police or fire siren. 

D. Telephone reactions; e.g., strong startle response to phone ringing, many hang-up calls to the home, a compulsion to make calls (often toll-free), finding the phone in his/her hand in early am hours.

E. Severe flinching and spasms (as if being electro-shocked) when approaching trauma material.

Knowledge of the methods of torture used within ritual abuse and trauma-based mind control provides a basis for recognition of related trauma disorders. Individuals subjected to these forms of torture may experience intense fear, phobic reactions, or physiological symptoms in response to associated stimuli. In some cases, the individual, or particular dissociated identities, experience a preoccupation with, or attraction to, related stimuli.

Victims may be able to describe the torture they have endured, or they may fear doing so. In many cases of ritual abuse and mind control trauma, the abuse remains dissociated when the individual first seeks treatment. Typically, the initial presenting problems are symptoms of anxiety, depression, or trauma derived from childhood sexual abuse, usually by a family member, who is eventually understood as a participant in the abuser group.

The following is a partial list of these forms of torture:
1. Sexual abuse and torture.

2. Confinement in boxes, cages, coffins, etc, or burial (often with an opening or air-tube for oxygen).

3. Restraint; with ropes, chains, cuffs, etc.

4. Near-drowning.

5. Extremes of heat and cold, including submersion in ice water, and burning chemicals.

6. Skinning (only top layers of the skin are removed in victims intended to survive).

7. Spinning.

8. Blinding light.

9. Electric shock.

10. Forced ingestion of offensive body fluids and matter, such as blood, urine, feces, flesh, etc.

11. Hung in painful positions or upside down.

12. Hunger and thirst.

13. Sleep deprivation.

14. Compression with weights and devices.

15. Sensory deprivation.

16. Drugs to create illusion, confusion, and amnesia, often given by injection or intravenously.

17. Ingestion or intravenous toxic chemicals to create pain or illness, including chemotherapy agents.

18. Limbs pulled or dislocated.

19. Application of snakes, spiders, maggots, rats, and other animals to induce fear and disgust.

20. Near-death experiences; commonly asphyxiation by choking or drowning, with immediate resuscitation.

22. Forced to perform or witness abuse, torture and sacrifice of people and animals, usually with knives.

23. Forced participation in child pornography and prostitution.

24. Raped to become pregnant; the foetus is then aborted for ritual use, or the baby is taken for sacrifice or enslavement.

25. Spiritual abuse to cause victim to feel possessed, harassed, and controlled internally by spirits or demons.

26. Desecration of Judeo-Christian beliefs and forms of worship; Dedication to Satan or other deities.

27. Abuse and illusion to convince victims that God is evil, such as convincing a child that God has raped her.

28. Surgery to torture, experiment, or cause the perception of physical or spiritual bombs or implants.
29. Harm or threats of harm to family, friends, loved ones, pets, and other victims, to force compliance.

30. Use of illusion and virtual reality to confuse and create non-credible disclosure.
To illustrate, ritual abuse survivors may experience intense phobic reactions to spiders or maggots (item 19). They may fear water and baths (item 4). They often fear hypodermic needles (item 16). They become easily too cold, too hot (item 5), or thirsty (item 12).

They may have aversive reactions to cameras (item 23). They may become upset upon seeing babies, dolls, or particular animals, or they may strongly identify with abused and abandoned animals and children (items 22 and 24). Sexual aversions are common (items 1, 23, and 24), as are vulnerability to repeated sexual victimization, sexual compulsions, and in some cases, paraphilias, such as sadism (Young, Sachs, Braun, & Watkins, 1991).

ED Noor: More often as a masochist than sadist since those used in sexual slavery are there to serve “their betters”.

Food aversions and eating disorders are common. Ritual abuse survivors may not be able to eat food that is brown or red because these remind them of feces and blood. They are often repulsed by meat, are vegetarian, or fast excessively, or regurgitate food, derived from forced ingestion of body matter and fluids (item 10).

Ritual abuse survivors, by and large, believe in the presence and power of spiritually evil forces, and often feel personally plagued by these (items 25, 26, 27, and 28). They may experience anxiety or an aversion to God and religion (item 26 and 27), or may alternatively be devout in their spiritual beliefs and practices.

Art productions, creative writing, and sand trays, will often reflect their torture; including knives, religious symbols, frightening figures, coffins, burials, etc. Children unconsciously re-enact elements of torture they have witnessed or experienced with toys and other objects. For example, a 3-year-old boy wrapped a rope three times around his neck and pulled upward, as if to hang himself. A 3-year-old girl sang about marrying Satan.

External or internal reminders of torture-related stimuli often precipitate dissociative responses, such as entering a trance state, falling asleep, or another personality taking executive control of the individual. Torture-associated stimuli may also elicit disturbing impulses to re-enact unprocessed trauma, such as impulses to self-mutilate, or thoughts of stabbing or sexually assaulting another person.

Somatoform and conversion reactions occur frequently in response to ritual abuse and mind control trauma-reminders. Individuals often experience localized pain, especially genitourinary, musculoskeletal, and gastrointestinal, motor inhibitions, nausea, or even swelling in the affected area, prior to retrieval of any visual or narrative memory of the related torture. These are generally very distressing to the affected individual. Once the trauma is re-associated and processed within the context of psychotherapy or other forms of support, these somatoform and conversion reactions usually dissipate.

Survivors of trauma-based mind control often respond with anxiety to fluorescent lighting, since so much programming utilizes intense lighting (item 8). They may startle in response to a telephone ringing, related to programming to receive or make calls to abusers. They may believe they have microphones inside their heads that will relay their disclosures to their abusers (item 27). Fears of electronic or spiritual surveillance and threats to loved ones (item 29) inhibit their ability to defy and escape their abusers or to disclose their abuse.

All of these symptoms can occur prior to the individual having any conscious understanding of the related abuse. This point is critical. Dissociative and neurobiological responses to overwhelming trauma (van Der Kolk, McFarlane, & Weisaeth, 1996) often prevent these experiences from being processed into a coherent narrative memory. The diagnostician cannot rely on the patient to put the pieces together of their clinical picture.

Finally, generalized guilt and survivor guilt are strongly associated with ritual abuse, since participation in victimization of others is a mainstay of ritual abuse and mind control torture (items 22 and 29).

For more on recognition of symptoms specific to ritual abuse trauma, see Boyd (1991); Coleman (1994); Gould (1992); Hudson (1991); Mangen (1992); Oksana (2001); Pulling and Cawthorn, 1989; Ross (1995); Ryder (1992); Young (1992); and Young and Young (1997).

Ed Noor:  Story time based on....

Reality. This is Zeena, daughter of Anton LeVay at her very special 5th birthday party, an event she remembers with great fondness because she was hailed and worshipped for the first time in her memory.

Boyd, A. (1991). Blasphemous rumours: Is Satanic ritual abuse fact or fantasy? An investigation. London: HarperCollins

Coleman, J. (1994a). Presenting features in adult victims of Satanist ritual abuse. Child Abuse Review, 3, 83-92.

Gould, C. (1992). Diagnosis and treatment of ritually abused children. In D.K. Sakheim & S.E. Devine (Eds.), Out of darkness: Exploring Satanism and ritual abuse (pp. 207-248). New York: Lexington Books.

Hudson, P.S. (1991). Ritual child abuse: discovery, diagnosis and treatment. Saratoga, CA: R & E Publishers.

Mangen, R. (1992). Psychological testing and ritual abuse. In D.K. Sakheim & S.E. Devine (Eds.), Out of darkness: Exploring Satanism and ritual abuse (pp. 147-173). New York: Lexington.

Oksana, C. (1994, revised 2001). Safe passage to healing: A guide for survivors of ritual abuse. NY: Harper Perennial.

Pulling, P., & Cawthorn, K. (1989). The devils web: Who is stalking your children for Satan?. Lafayette, Louisiana: Huntington House.

Ross, C.A. (1995). Satanic ritual abuse: Principles of treatment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Ryder, D., & Noland, J.T. (1992). Breaking the circle of Satanic ritual abuse: Recognizing and recovering from the hidden trauma. Minneapolis, MN: CompCare Publishers.

van der Kolk, B.A., McFarlane, A.C., & Weisaeth, L. (Eds.) (1996). Traumatic stress: The effects of overwhelming experience on mind, body, and society. New York: Guilford.

Young, W.C. (1992). Recognition and treatment of survivors reporting ritual abuse. In D.K. Sakheim & S.E. Devine (Eds.), Out of darkness: Exploring Satanism and ritual abuse (pp. 249-278). New York: Lexington.

Young, W.C., Sachs, R.G., Braun, B.G., & Watkins, R.T. (1991). Patients reporting ritual abuse in childhood: A clinical syndrome. Report of 37 cases. Child Abuse and Neglect, 15, 181-189.

Young, W.C., & Young, L.J. (1997). Recognition and special treatment issues in patients reporting childhood sadistic ritual abuse. In G.A. Fraser (Ed.), The dilemma of ritual abuse: Cautions and guides for therapists (pp. 65-103). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

Modified: November 13, 2010