Sunday 30 June 2013


They have always been master story tellers! I found at least ten different mapped routes taken by the gang after their alleged flight from slavery. Once again the folks over at Aangirfan are thinking outside the box!

ED Noor: This isn't really how the deal went down?

Source: Aangirfan
June 29, 2013

During the 1980s there were new discoveries in archaeology.

The story of the 13th century BC exodus
from Egypt into the PROMISED LAND
was shown to be a myth.

Moses could not have led the Hebrews out of Egypt into the Promised Land, because the Promised Land was Egyptian territory at the time. 

The archaeologists say there is no trace of either a slave revolt against the Egyptian empire or of a sudden conquest of Canaan by outsiders. 

Nor is there any trace or memory of the Biblical kingdom of David and Solomon.

Just a parable.

"Biblical promises about the land of Israel were never intended to be taken literally, or as applying to a defined geographical territory, the report argued...
“Biblical promises about the land of Israel are a way of speaking about how to live under God so that justice and peace reign, the weak and poor are protected, the stranger is included, and all have a share in the community and a contribution to make to it.

"The 'promised land' in the Bible is not a place, so much as a metaphor of how things ought to be among the people of God.

"This 'promised land'
can be found
~ or built ~
ED Noor: This means possibly THIS place could be the holy real estate promised land!

Bitches and hoes

THE 2013 REPORT is from the Church of Scotland.

The inheritance of Abraham? A report on the ‘promised land’ (*.PDF document)

The Israeli Ambassador commented negatively on the report.

Representatives of the Scottish Council of Jewish Communities, the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the Movement for Reform Judaism, and Rabbis for Human Rights held a meeting with the Church of Scotland.

At this meeting, it was agreed that the report would be withdrawn and revised.

(Church statement is available here. The revised report)

General assembly

The revised version was debated at the Church of Scotland's annual General Assembly in Edinburgh.
Rev Sally Foster-Fulton said: "This is primarily a report highlighting the continued occupation by the state of Israel and the injustices faced by the Palestinian people as a consequence.
"It is not a report criticising the Jewish people. Opposing the unjust policies of the state of Israel cannot be equated to anti-Semitism. "
The revised report was overwhelmingly accepted by the Assembly.

Kirk backs controversial Israel report | Herald Scotland

In 2010, there was debate in the Church of Scotland about the possibility of boycotting Israeli goods.

The Rev Ian Galloway withdrew the proposed boycott call as a result of the threat to the Church’s work in the region from Israeli laws designed to make boycott calls illegal.

"The General Assembly 'may take this legislation to be intimidatory', said Mr Galloway, adding sorrowfully: 'We are intimidated.'"

Assessing the Kirk's report on theologies of land in the ... ~ Ekklesia

There were only about 50,000 Jews in Palestine in 1918. (Cached)

On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram and said, "To your descendants I give this land, from Seattle to Orlando and from Boston to Los Angeles - the land of the Apache, the Huron, the Blackfeet...."

Genesis 15:18-21

The Palestinians are most likely the original Jews.

Most of the Jews in Israel are not the original Jews of the Bible, but people who converted to the Jewish religion.

Most of the Jews in Israel are descended from people in countries such as Germany, Georgia, Ukraine, Yemen, and Morocco who were not originally Jewish.

The Palestinians are most likely the original Jews.

Schlomo Sand, professor of history at Tel Aviv University, wrote about the Zionist myth at Le Monde Diplomatique, in September 2008.

(Zionist nationalist myth of enforced exile: Israel deliberately forgets its history)

Palestinians ~ who probably converted from the Jewish religion to Islam.
Among the points made by Professor Sand:

1. In 70 AD, the Jews were allegedly exiled and went to live in countries such as Yemen, Morocco, Spain, Germany, Poland and Russia.

2. At the end of the 19th century, people claiming to be Jews began to talk about setting up a Jewish state.

The 'Jews' who invaded Palestine were terrorist gangsters from places such as New York, Warsaw and Belarus.
3. Is the Bible historically accurate?

The first modern Jewish historians, such as Isaak Markus Jost (1793-1860) and Leopold Zunz (1794-1886), did not think so.

They saw the stories of the Old Testament as being useful parables.

Victim of an Israeli rocket.

4. During the 1980s there were new discoveries in archaeology.
The story of the 13th century BC exodus was shown to be a myth.
Moses could not have led the Hebrews out of Egypt into the Promised Land, because the Promised Land was Egyptian territory at the time.

The archaeologists say there is no trace of either a slave revolt against the Egyptian empire or of a sudden conquest of Canaan by outsiders.
Nor is there any trace or memory of the Biblical kingdom of David and Solomon.
Many of the Nazi leaders were part Jewish.

5. The Kingdom of Israel was a tiny little place.

6. Were the Jews exiled in 70 AD?

The Romans never exiled any nation from anywhere on the eastern seaboard of the Mediterranean.
The Jewish population of Judea continued to live on their lands after 70AD.
Some converted to Christianity in the 4th century, while the majority became Moslems during the 7th century.
Most Zionist thinkers were aware of this.
Yitzhak Ben Zvi, later president of Israel, and David Ben Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, accepted it.
Both stated on several occasions that the Palestinians were the descendants of the Jewish inhabitants of ancient Judea.
So, the Palestinians are the real Jews.

Begin and his Betar members wore brown shirts and used the fascist salute. (Cached)

7. So, what about the people in Europe and elsewhere who claimed to be Jews?

From the 2nd century BC onwards, many people were forcibly converted to the Jewish religion.

Many Europeans, Africans and Asians were converted to Judaism.

For example, in the 1st century AD, in Kurdistan, there was the Jewish kingdom of Adiabene.

In the 5th century, in Yemen, a Jewish kingdom emerged.

Arab chronicles tell of North African Berber tribes becoming Jewish, during the 7th century.

Israel tries to control the politicians.
8. In the 8th century, the most important mass conversion took place.

This was in the huge Khazar kingdom between the Black and Caspian seas.

Judaism spread from the Caucasus into the Ukraine, then into Eastern Europe, and on to Germany. 
The Yiddish culture of Europe involved people who had converted to the Jewish religion.

9. The Israeli forces who seized Jerusalem in 1967 may have been descendents of Germans, Yemenis, Berbers and Khazars.
Victims of Israel ~ Dier Yassin

At Haaretz, on 21 March 2008, Ofri Ilani wote about shattering a 'national mythology'.

Shattering a 'national mythology' ~ Haaretz ~ Israel News

Ilani refers to Dahia al-Kahina, a leader of the Berbers in the Aures Mountains.

Al-Kahina was the daughter of a Berber tribe that had converted to Judaism.

According to the Tel Aviv University historian, Prof. Shlomo Sand, author of "Matai ve'ech humtza ha'am hayehudi?" ("When and How the Jewish People Was Invented?"), the queen's tribe and other local tribes are the main sources from which Spanish Jewry sprang.


ED Noor: The international company Benetton is a major proponent of this all one deception. According to these ads, everyone is young, beautiful and blended perfectly. In the wonderful world of ad fantasia, multiculturalism is just the greatest thing ever. However, look again and you will also note a scarcity of white males and the ones pictured look to be homosexual.


Just as the left has been manipulated so too have a considerable number in the so called 'truth movement'. There are many, myself included,
who consider David Icke to be an agent, conscious or otherwise, of the Satanic 'elite'. Interestingly, his 'solution' to the New World Order agenda is for us all to realise that we are 'all one consciousness' and that 'everything is an illusion'. 

Ed Noor: In perusing quotes from this “soldier of God” I found naught that had to do with God and much to do with self-empowerment and echoes of Crowley’s “Do as thou wilt” Satanism. There was nothing Catholic or Christian there in the least; far too much hubris. 

This is a concept that, arguably, has its modern roots in the teachings of the Catholic Jesuit priest, who was often called the 'father of the New Age movement, Pierre Teilhard De Chardin. This 'illusion' happens to include nations, races and cultures. The subtle deception at play here is that in order to defeat the New World Order we have to realise that nation states and racial and cultural distinctions are not only unimportant they are actually illusory. Of course the destruction of nations and national identities just happen to be key New World Order goals.

Luciferic 'sun in triangle' image taken from Zeitgeist The Movie
Similarly with the popular Zeitgeist 'anti-NWO' series of films. Their solution to the problems of the world is a 'good' world government (the Venus Project) that doesn't recognise race or national boundaries. Sounds wonderful until you fully understand what this entails. Zeitgeist has been exposed as little more than a 'repackaged Communism for 21st century truth seekers' but it's actually a lot more dangerous than that.
ED Noor: The hauntingly beautiful song by John Lennon, “Imagine” written during the heady days of his leadership in the peace movement was interpreted as his dream for an idyllic future. This song was not, however, about the simple dream the words portray. Listen to the words again after reading this and the song will take on an entirely different meaning. Then ask yourself why Lennon was assassinated by President Reagan?
The 'solutions' proposed by David Icke, Zeitgeist and others ensure that, not only do large numbers of the 'truth movement' inadvertently further the New World Order agenda, but that they also actively deride and see as their enemy anyone who does seek to protect or defend their nation or national identity. 

What those behind the New World Order desire
is complete conformity
so as to more easily control the human race.
As with the 'left' there are many in the truth movement who haven't considered the full implications of the complete loss of their national identity.
What should also be noted is that the racial destruction of the European peoples is just the first step.
Do we really want to eliminate all races on the earth?
If not then why support the destruction of those peoples denigrated as 'white'?
It should be remembered that this long term genocidal process is irreversible.
The survival of those ethnic groups collectively referred to as the 'white race' such as the English, French, German, Scottish, Danish or Welsh is really the prerequisite for the survival of all the races on this earth.
The Satanic 'elite'
make great claims about 'celebrating diversity'
when in reality all They are really doing
is highlighting differences
with a view to eliminating them.
They have forced together disparate and largely incompatible groups with a view to fomenting division, problems, instability and even violence in order to create the conditions necessary to advance their New World Order agenda.
True diversity is all the wonderful cultures and races that have developed over centuries.
The same ones that need to be destroyed for this New World Order.
The best defence against it are sovereign, independent, nations, co-operating freely where required. Their fear is that if just one country slips out of their control it will serve as an example to the rest of true freedom and independence from the global enslavement agenda.
These agents of deception claim
that 'races are a false construct'
that are meant to 'divide us'.
This is clever psychological manipulation. Races aren't a 'false construct' and neither do they inevitably cause 'division'.
It is the Satanic elite that manipulate and create false conflict and it is them we need to do away with not the cultural heritage that is the creation of the wonderfully diverse peoples of the earth.
This sort of psychological manipulation is a very good example of what we are constantly subjected to and of which all of us should be aware. It's often referred to as 'perception management' but that is really just a polite way of saying brainwashing. It really is something that we should all investigate thoroughly.
Merely being aware of the existence of brainwashing and the techniques used greatly diminishes its effectiveness.
This issue is highlighted in another quote from the Fabian Bertrand Russell. In his book 'The Impact of Science on Society', published in 1952, Russell discusses the subject of mass psychology and gives us an insight into the thought processes of the elite.
"What is essential in mass psychology is the art of persuasion. If you compare a speech of Hitler’s with a speech of (say) Edmund Burke, you will see what strides have been made in the art since the eighteenth century. What went wrong formerly was that people had read in books that man is a rational animal and framed their arguments on this hypothesis. We now know that limelight and a brass band do more to persuade than can be done by the most elegant train of syllogisms.
It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.

This subject [mass psychology] will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship. Anaxagoras maintained that snow is black, but no one believed him. The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakeable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at.
First, that the influence of home is obstructive.
Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten.
Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective.
Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity.
But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark grey.”
Although the desire to indoctrinate and brainwash remains the same, the techniques used to do it have developed enormously since the 1950's. Possibly the greatest development in this regard has been the television. Edward Bernays has been described as the 'father of public relations'. In his book 'Propaganda', written in 1928, he said the following:
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society.
In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons...who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind."
In the essay Brainwashing: How the British Use the Media for Mass Psychological Warfare media ‘expert’ Hal Becker is quoted as saying:
“The media is the most powerful weapon and ‘agent of change’ in the fight to establish a ‘one-worldist’, 'neo-Malthusian' order that will transcend and obliterate the concept of the nation-state.”
It's worth reflecting on these quotes. We have been and continue to be overwhelmed with propaganda relating to mass immigration and multiculturalism. There are, however, a few that either resist or are immune to the brainwashing. It is these people that need to be demonised or otherwise discredited as hinted at above. Very few dissenting views are allowed and any that are have to be framed in such a way as to make them seem 'racist' or 'fascist'.
Make no mistake, it is Their intention to destroy Britain and mass immigration and multiculturalism are just two of the methods They are using. Once you become aware of this intention it's possible to see the relentless propaganda to this effect in all the media, but especially TV. 
How the demonisation works is illustrated in the following section taken from an essay on the Hidden Evil website. In it (Anthony) Sutton and (Patrick) Wood warned:
"Anyone in the U.S. who promotes unwelcome news for the elite receives some unwelcome attention in return. This attention includes the use of experts, mainstream media and anti-hate organizations for well-coordinated character assassination. According to author Perloff, a document released by the House Committee on Un-American Activities, on September 23, 1956 entitled, Propaganda and the Alert Citizen outlined the tactics reportedly used by the Establishment to discredit opposition.
Quoting from this document, Perloff wrote:
The tactic used had a prototype in a directive issued by the Communist Party... It read: When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them, after suitable build-ups, as Fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic, and use the prestige of anti-Fascist and tolerance organisations to discredit them. In the public mind constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell.'”
For an example of how the ruling 'elites' view us this short excerpt of an interview with Aldous Huxley is enlightening. In it he discusses the techniques for the 'chemical control' of humanity. There are many who think that the future world government system will be something akin to Orwell's 1984. The reality is that it is much more likely to be closer to Huxley's vision in his book 'Brave New World' where 'the slaves ... do not have to be coerced because they love their servitude'.
Establishment stooge Nick Griffin whose role it is to associate all forms of nationalism with Nazism or fascism 
That Perloff quote above was used in the article, 'Is Nick Griffin A Freemason (Why The New World Order Needs The BNP)?', where the case was made for the leader of the British National Party being 'controlled opposition' and attempted to show why it is so important to the agenda.
I'd begun to see how the BNP were an essential part of the dialectic that enabled opposition to mass immigration, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism, the European Union and the wider globalisation agenda to be labelled as extreme, fascist, xenophobic, racist or Nazi.
These are all very strong mind control trigger-words, which were now to be associated with any form of nationalist resistance to the New World Order.
There was also another benefit of having the BNP identified with nationalism and then disparaged in such a way. Many of the issues they raise are ignored or not discussed because to do otherwise would give ‘aid to the fascists’ or something similar. The irony here is that to not discuss these things gives 'aid' to the real fascists, the Satanic oligarchy.
Again very clever mind control tactics employed by them.
Even if you raise concerns about issues such as multiculturalism or mass immigration you run the risk of being labelled a BNP ‘fellow traveller’ and indirectly tagged with the slurs mentioned above. Genuine public debate on these important issues is therefore severely restricted and controlled, if allowed at all.

Incidentally the other key role performed by Nick Griffin is to continually destabilise the party by engineering damaging splits and dissent within it. This serves to prevent any organised opposition to the real fascists plan for Their New World Order. Any keen observer of the BNP in recent years can see it is a role he has played only too well.

This is just one more example of the 'divide and rule' policy being pursued by the controlling elites. As those behind the globalising 'New World Order' agenda slowly but surely transfer power upwards to an unaccountable 'elite' few, the Balkanising effects of mass immigration and multiculturalism make any concerted resistance almost impossible. The government becomes a sort of conflict manager enabling the real controllers to skilfully play different ethnic groups off against each other in whatever way furthers their agenda.

The 'liberal left', under the hidden guidance of the Satanic oligarchy, enthusiastically sought and continues to seek, to suppress any nationalistic, cultural, or ethnic solidarity among the native British, particularly the English. This is supposedly done because the abolition of 'nationalism' will somehow mean the end of war and conflict and inaugurate world peace.
Nationalism is really an extension of tribalism and it is ridiculous to think that tribalism can be eliminated, apart from it being essentially unnecessary. Only a ruthless totalitarian government could hope to do so and only the New World Order ‘elite’ and a few deluded Marxists and Nazis desire that.
The irony is that other ethnic groups aren't being made to dissolve their tribal feelings and loyalties. Quite the reverse, they are encouraged and even funded with grants through numerous ethnic only organisations. What those on the liberal left fail to see is the real agenda behind those who fund and control these things from behind the scenes.

'Tribalism' doesn't necessarily lead to conflict. A good nationalist always seeks to cooperate with other countries to each other’s mutual benefit. Besides even if the whole world had the same green skin colour, the green people north of the river could still be manipulated into conflict with the green people on the south side if it was in the interests of the ruling oligarchs. It is They that are the problem. It's being increasingly revealed that many, if not all, of the conflicts throughout history, including the major World Wars, can be traced back to
Their manipulations and machinations.

The forefathers of the same ruling 'elite' that are today behind the New World Order and its agenda for global enslavement. As stated earlier, nationalism is actually the best defence against these tyrants. What they fear the most is that a country will escape their influence and be seen to be able to thrive and succeed, as it surely could and thereby serving as an example to other countries around the world.
As with a large proportion of the 'truth movement', the liberal left have been manipulated into thinking that nationalism is the problem and by their promotion of global solutions they are, inadvertently, assisting the real fascist agenda.

'Pampered white liberal' Andrew Marr
The 'pampered white liberal' and establishment flunky, journalist Andrew Marr, called for:
"...widespread and vigorous miscegenation (race mixing)' [and the] vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress [those who resists mass immigration and multiculturism]"
I would assume he did this whilst being completely unaware of the Satanic agenda he's helping to further. 
ED Noor: Why is it these people pushing this agenda are often (as above) ugly as sin and certainly too ugly to breed? Oooops, was I being politically incorrect again?!

Of course miscegenation is the very thing the Luciferian cabal desire in their bid to 'mongrelise' humanity and create the 'new race of humans' similar in their appearance to the Ancient Egyptians. This is always dressed up as being the very noblest of ideals; the unity and oneness of man without discrimination, complete equality etc.
The reality is that it is another Tower of Babel
where this new race,
devoid of all previous cultural and racial distinctions,
is designed to serve an elite few
in thrall to their sun god Lucifer.
These self styled 'philosopher kings', think many years in advance and what we are witnessing now is only the beginning of a long process. Make no mistake, there is an all-out psychological propaganda war designed to promote miscegenation wherever possible, particularly in the media, entertainment, sports and education systems. Every Pavlovian trick is being used to make miscegenation appear cool, trendy, fashionable and even desirable. 
ED Noor: The miscegenation project really kicked into public gear with mid-1960’s movies starring black actor Sidney Poitier. On both sides of the pond his movies were very influential in shaping the values of the White middle class young greatly. 

His non-threatening personas and the roles given him were promoted as classics, including the films “Guess Who’s Coming To Dinner” and “To Sir With Love” ~ both promoting the image  of a humanitarian, civilized and dignified young man dealing with awkward situations with poise and eloquent words.

People may scoff at the idea that we can be unconsciously reprogrammed to do these things but it happens all the time. In 1920 Edward Bernays was approached by the American Tobacco Corporation who
wanted to encourage more women to smoke. Up until that point smoking was very much a male pursuit that few women partook in. From his research Bernays determined that women viewed the cigarette as a phallic symbol and associated it with power and dominance, hence their lack of interest. In order to 'reprogram' them Bernays decided to create a 'publicity' event during a New York Easter parade. He coached a group of young women to dramatically light up their cigarettes making sure they were conspicuous and that several reporters were present to record the 'event.
Bernays explained how this was a 'declaration of independence' on behalf of the women and an expression of 'female solidarity'.
This shocking behaviour (for the time) ensured a media frenzy the end result of which was that women had successfully been reprogrammed. No longer did they view the cigarette as a phallic symbol; it was now a 'torch of freedom'. The use of cigarettes by women steadily increased from that day, all thanks to an American tobacco company and some clever brainwashing, perception management and mind control on behalf of Bernays.

The techniques used in modern times are now far more sophisticated and the medium of choice and the one that is the most effective, is the television. Gerry Hines, a Programme Organiser for the BBC, was quoted in Race Today as saying:
"Newspapers have to sell in order to live, so does commercial TV. That leaves the BBC as the only truly public service medium in this country disseminating information, entertainment, and in the case of race relations, propaganda. We are unashamed to admit it, is what we are doing."
This isn't the benign, altruistic endeavour it appears to be. It's the first steps in the subtle genocide of the English and British that will end in their eventual biological destruction. Nobody should dictate to another whom they should and shouldn't marry but that's a far cry from the pernicious attempts at mind control and brainwashing that has been and continues to be, waged on this issue.

President Tubman of Liberia is reported to have said that:
“Wwe are opposed to integration. It is a bad thing and we condemn it. Why should we destroy our identity? We love our black skins and we are proud of our heritage. Our country is open to all people of African descent".
Should he be condemned as a racist and forced to have quotas for Asians, Arabs and Europeans that would see those of African descent become a minority?
Should there then be a secret and sustained attempt to promote the idea of miscegenation, by any means possible, in order to change the biological characteristics of those very same Africans?
This isn't about miscegenation per se, it's about deliberately setting out to promote the idea with the sole intent of altering the genetics of the target ethnic group that is perceived to be an obstacle to your plan to enslave and subjugate humanity.
As an aside, it's worth observing that if the leader of European country ever expressed a desire to keep the racial heritage of their country pure, there would be a massive outcry led by the liberal left.

Marr cheers because the elite controlled government pass a Race Relations Act that he says:
"... will impose the will of the state on millions…"
Again completely oblivious (I assume) as to who truly controls that state and what their intent is. Like Gerry Hines, he also works for the BBC which is the major conduit in this country for the mind control, brainwashing and propaganda we briefly looked at earlier. When considering Andrew Marr and the scores of 'left wing' journalists like him, I'm reminded of another quote from the essay, 'Brainwashing: How the British Use the Media for Mass Psychological Warfare:'
"[The Club of Rome] can also call on the capabilities of a mass psychological warfare machine, also run by the British and their assets, which extends into key phases of media production, and includes writers and psychiatrists who help shape the content, and the pollsters who fine-tune and analyse the impact on targeted populations. Beyond this interacting network, there are millions of participants involved in the production, distribution, and transmission of media messages, whose thinking, in turn, has been shaped by the content of the media product, and who are, effectively, self-brainwashed by the culture within which they live."

Most of the things that Marr and others consider to be 'racist' do not involve violence towards other ethnic minorities but are merely the expression of the natural feelings of belonging to a particular ethnic group. Feelings that are encouraged amongst other ethnic groups but, according to Marr, require 'stamping hard on' to 'kill them off' when done by any native Briton.
The idea that only 'whites' can be racist is a carefully manipulated lie.
Other racial or ethnic groupings are every bit as 'racist' as 'whites', some possibly more so. In fact in some of the last figures published by the government, statistics showed that 'whites' were far more likely to be victims of racial violence than ethnic minorities.
Although presented in a deceptive manner typical of all British government's, a careful analysis showed that in 1999 the 'white' population were approximately 90% of the population and yet made up 60% of the victims. Put another way, ethnic minorities, despite being only 10% of the population, committed 60% of the crimes, whilst 'whites being 90% of the population committed, at most, 40%. It is probably very likely that a significant number of the racial violence aimed at ethnic minorities were perpetrated by a different ethnic minority.

These figures shouldn't be a surprise considering that ethnic minorities, particularly children in the education (indoctrination) system, are constantly being told that all 'whites' are responsible for such things as the Empire and the slave trade. The finger of blame is never pointed at the true source of these evils, the worshippers of Lucifer and/or Satan that have suppressed and enslaved us all.
Neither is it pointed at other ethnic groups that are equally culpable. 
British male deemed 'privileged and powerful' solely due to his skin colour

The original dictionary definition of 'discrimination' is the ability or power to see or make fine distinctions; discernment.' In other words it is no more than being able to tell the difference between things. Still, we are told that discrimination is wrong and yet there are numerous examples of anti-white discrimination. The large number of 'black' or 'minority ethnic' only organisations, often tax payer funded, are but one example.
Another would be the so called 'equality' legislation that makes it legal to discriminate against 'whites' in the jobs market. Bizarrely a poor 'white', working class, youth from a council estate is somehow deemed to have an advantage of some sorts, solely due to the colour of his skin, over a middle class ethnic Indian from a wealthy home.
This is sometimes excused by the notion that there needs to be distinct ethnic quotas in the job market. That ethnic Jamaicans, for example, will only respond favourably to police who are also ethnic Jamaicans or even more crudely that only 'blacks' can be policed effectively by other 'blacks'.
Ignoring the obvious racism in such an idea it is never operated in reverse where it can be said that only 'whites' can be effectively be policed or have their fire put out by other 'whites'.
The relentless 'Cultural Marxist' propaganda war inevitably results in staggeringly wrong statements such as the following by left wing comedian and Beeboid, Jo Brand. In an interview on BBC Radio Five Live she said:
"You can't be racist towards white people".
She claims this is because all white people, somehow, have political power. As we've seen, the idea we have a democracy in this country is wishful thinking at best. We have a ruling 'elite' that operates in its interest and certainly not in the interests of the native British peoples of this nation.
The ruling 'elite' may have power but the inhabitants of the numerous sprawling council estates up and down this country don't. Sadly the attitude and thinking expressed by Brand is fairly typical of a sizeable section of the media, if not the 'liberal' establishment, in this country. This brings to mind some further quotes by Hal Becker, who was mentioned earlier.
"It can also call on the capabilities of a mass psychological warfare machine, also run by the British and their assets, which extends into key phases of media production, and includes writers and psychiatrists who help shape the content, and the pollsters who fine-tune and analyze the impact on targeted populations. Beyond this interacting network, there are millions of participants involved in the production, distribution, and transmission of media messages, whose thinking, in turn, has been shaped by the content of the media product, and who are, effectively, self-brainwashed by the culture within which they live.

It shouldn't be a surprise that the end result of all this psychological control is, of course the New World Order's world government."
If the quotas favour ethnic minorities, for example ethnic Indian doctors, there is never a clamour to reduce their numbers in favour of more white or even African doctors. These absurdities exist because they were never about 'equality' in the first place. They were always about disenfranchising the majority native British as part of the process of their destruction as a distinct ethnic and cultural group. It has to be remembered that these things are not being done for the benefit of ethnic minorities who are just being used as pawns in the Satanic New World Order game which will eventually subjugate us all.


In conclusion, mass immigration and multiculturalism are key elements of the world government agenda that the self styled 'philosophic elites' of the world are slowly working towards.
This carefully veiled false utopia will in essence be a new feudal system overseen by a cabal of Lucifer worshippers that will result in the enslavement of humanity mind, body and soul.
As counter intuitive as it seems to those on the 'left', the 'global capitalist' right and large sections of the 'truth movement', the best defence against this proposed New World Order is nationalism. Of course this must be a benign, natural, nationalism that seeks to cooperate with other nations to all of their interests.

As we've seen, their greatest fear is that if one single country escapes from their grasp and serves as an example to the rest of the world it will in turn set off a 'domino effect' that sees nation after nation demanding and getting true freedom. This more than anything would thwart the New World Order agenda. If the country that did escape was Britain the ripples felt would, perhaps, be greater than anywhere else due to our association with the Commonwealth. We shouldn't pretend that this would be easy. Indeed one of the reasons behind mass immigration was to make such a thing far harder by destroying the cohesion that is more easily found in ethnically homogenous countries.
ED Noor: It is this fear that has Israel demanding the demise of Iran for so many years. Iran stands strong and intelligently against their enemies, using great patience and wisdom ~ and leadership ~ these things are much needed in the Islamic World and other nations are seeing Iran’s stability and strength even in the face of constant provocation and crippling sanctions. This is the threat that Iran truly offers.

The idea that Commonwealth countries gained complete independence and escaped the clutches of the British Empire is somewhat misleading.
All that really happened was that agents of the ruling 'elite' were put into positions of power in Commonwealth countries and are kept there by the similar manipulations of the democratic process that we suffer from here in Britain.
The countries of the Commonwealth are no more free or democratic than we are here in Britain and are still ultimately controlled from here by the Crown.
As in Britain, Freemasonry and the secret society networks are an essential part of the control structure. Much of the so-called 'foreign aid' budget is used to grease the wheels of this process.

If the nest of vipers that is the Crown in the City of London, the Royal and aristocratic parasites that feed off it and the puppet politicians who dance to their tune, could be defeated here in Britain we would almost certainly be in a position to help the rest of the Commonwealth to throw off their chains. Nothing would relieve the issue of immigration more than this, nor better relieve poverty.
In fact freed from the asset stripping and debt enslavement of the banks (who serve as a proxy for the ruling 'elite') many so called 'Third World' countries could thrive and prosper.
Indeed I would guess this would then serve as a catalyst for many ethnic minorities wishing to return to their native countries, if for no other reason than the weather would be better.
A reduction in the numbers of ethnic minorities here in Britain can only be a good thing. This would allow those British, who wish to do so, to continue their centuries old culture and way of life by living in communities of their choice. Those other British who prefer to live in multi-ethnic and multi-cultural communities would also be free to do so. This wouldn't require laws to pass it would just happen naturally if and when the State stopped trying to socially engineer and 'change' us all. 

Instead of increasing the already very high population density of this country through mass immigration we could reduce the number of human battery cages aka tower blocks and the associated social problems they create
This can't be anything other than desirable considering the already existing social problems and the ever increasing population density of England. It is now the most overcrowded country in Europe with double the population density level of Germany and quadruple that of France. England is also among the highest in the world for major countries, ranking third behind Bangladesh and South Korea. This is a situation that will only get worse if immigration continues.

Defenders of mass immigration say we need the skilled workers for our own economy. Leaving aside the spurious economic claims (including the said necessity for constant economic growth, which is only really necessary because of our iniquitous banking system) and the fact that this situation has largely been intentionally engineered, what they are saying is that we needn't worry about enticing skilled workers, including doctors and nurses, from developing countries because our economic needs have to come first. 

It really is incredible that those on the 'left' can defend such a thing but it perhaps serves as an example of the strength of the 'perception management' (by what Israel Shamir describes as the 'Masters of Discourse) we are subjected to. Sidney Webb, founder of the Fabian Society, which proposes and works towards a socialist world government, hinted at how the real controllers of society operate when he said:
“To play those millions of minds, to watch them slowly respond to an unseen stimulus, to guide their aspirations without their knowledge ~ all this whether in high capacities or in humble, is a big and endless game of chess, of ever extraordinary excitement.”
It's my contention that on the issues of mass immigration and multiculturalism, perhaps more than any other, we are being 'played' by the Sidney Webb's of today.

If any ethnic minority did want to return to their roots a grant, along with an apology from all those who contributed to this 'brain drain' from the Third World, would seem to be the least that could be done. A less populated Britain would eliminate the increasing pressure to build on limited green belt land. Even better would be the chance to have more green spaces in the (unhealthy) concrete jungles that are our major cities. People are not meant to be living like battery chickens surrounded by the noise and pollution that is the common characteristic of British cities. Surely more green corridors, urban farms, parks and gardens would be better than ever-increasing numbers of high rise blocks of flats that pack us in like sardines?

The raft of organisations dedicated to 'diversity' and 'tolerance' and the promotion of political correctness are no more than 'elite' funded social re-engineering tools. Their roots are in the Cultural Marxism that seeks to destroy us all in the process of creating a global
'communitarian' monoculture.

In highlighting our 'differences'
and making this seem to be
the root cause of the world's problems,
the goal is to erase them all together.

ED Noor: Think of all those international harmony Coca Cola adds for example.

When we are all 'one' and 'united' the Satanic elite will be close to their goal of a hive-minded slave race who are unaware (due to the 'dumbing down' of the education system and other methods) of the extent of their slavery.

The promotion of
'anti-racism' and
is intended to destroy
all of the wonderful and precious
ethnic and cultural identities
of the peoples of the world,
with those in 'white' nations being just the first.

It literally breaks my heart to see what is happening in Britain today ~ even more so when you fully realise the true reasons behind it.

There is nothing particularly moral about mass immigration and multiculturalism. In fact the point of this essay is that they are quite the reverse. They are the conscious misuse of ethnic minorities to bring about the genocide of the peoples of Britain and Europe in order to enslave us all, left, right, 'black', 'white', UAF or EDL.
As Israel Shamir pointers out the vast majority of immigrants 'do not want to act as the bridgehead of an invasion.' Enforcing mass immigration and multiculturalism on an unwilling population is every bit as 'fascist' as the 'fascism' the likes of the UAF claim to resist.
Despite the evidence provided here about the true reasons behind mass immigration and multiculturalism, there will inevitably be some who still wish to support these things. If they do they should remember that it is their choice and it is not something they can impose on other people.
As stated earlier, at least in the early stages, this is the oldest trick in the book, 'divide and rule'.
Whatever your feelings on this subject, it's imperative that we avoid falling into this trap.

It's worth repeating that our 'enemies'
are not each other
they are the same as they have ever been.

We all need to focus our attention on the Satanic elite and their minions and their plans for a New World Order.

Our differences can be much more easily resolved
when we are free of Their brainwashing and manipulations.
This isn't some plea for false unity though.

There'll be plenty of that in days to come as They seek to create ever more chaos and confusion in order to get us to 'unite' into 'oneness'. This is a  psychological attempt to manipulate us into their new global system.

This is about recognising the self evident fact that
as races and even ethnic groupings,
we have our differences.
At the same time
we are all members of humanity and
these differences needn't be
the cause of strife and conflict.

All too often they are exploited and manipulated in order to serve the interests of the ruling 'elite'.
That's who our real enemies are, not each other.
Resisting all this, peacefully and nonviolently, is the moral right of all those who don't wish to see the destruction of their race, ethnicity and culture and their subsequent subjugation in the new Tower of Babel that is the Luciferian/Satanic New World Order.