Saturday 31 October 2009


Until now, nations were killed by conquest, that is by invasion: but here an important question arises; can a nation not die on its own soil, without resettlement or invasion, by allowing the flies of decomposition to corrupt to the very core those original and constituent principles which make it what it is? ~ Joseph, Comte de Maistre, 1753 ~ 1821

For the most diabolical of his themes to thwart humanity from the good and decent, the Devil prefers to work behind the scenes, making changes deep so they are long lasting and the victims unaware of what has been done.

Our Western civilization is currently passing through a crisis which is essentially different from anything that has been previously experienced by mankind and it is so insidious that people SEE the results but do not have a CLUE how they came to be. Other societies in the past have changed their social institutions or their religious beliefs under the influence of external forces or the slow development of internal growth.
But none, like our own, has ever consciously faced the prospect of a fundamental alteration of the beliefs and institutions on which the whole fabric of our social life rests. Civilization is being uprooted from its foundations in nature and tradition and is being reconstituted in a new organization which is as artificial and mechanical as a modern factory.

But here, they have begun to go too far. I am including healthy family images just to point out the filth involved in the concepts being put forth in this article. The comments I add will also be pertinent to these horrors also. They are REAL quotes from the place behind all of these hidden changes in our society.
Although this is Jewish Pre-WW2 anti-Nazi propaganda, fanatic Talmudism is making these lies the modern international reality, starting with the Germans.

Basically what we see in action,
and have for at least 50 years,
is called Revolution and Eros ~
sexual instinct manipulated and used
as an element of social destruction.

This policy is not new, it has just never been defined. This technique has been used to bring down many cultures based on upstanding scruples down. Hamstrung by vice in whatever form can be imagined, attacked civilizations eventually fell prey as the Comte suggests. Egypt, Rome, Greece, Venice, France, London, Germany before WW2 ~ and now America ~ are among its victims.

To bring about the utter destruction of North America, ~ both Canada and the US ~ the Frankfurt School was created, funded by wealthy Jews with a heavy leaning towards Marxism. The plan was to
‘organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.’

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution ~ but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future ~ the Frankfurt School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offenses.

2. Continual change to create confusion

3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children

4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority

5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.

6. The promotion of excessive drinking

7. Emptying of churches

8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime

9. Dependency on the state for state benefits

10. Control and dumbing down of media

11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.

If you consider the changes we have seen over the past century, they are moving along at a greatly successful rate. This German indoctrination of sexualizing infants and young children fulfills several of these needs, all presented as "good" for the child's development. Please keep the above fresh in your mind as you read this filth.

The Destruction of the Father, 1974 by Louise Bourgeois. (THIS is the crap they fed us, besides this ugly "art") " Bourgeois reshapes the formative influences of her life into large sculptures that address her personal struggles against depression, agoraphobia, and other illnesses as well as her professional struggles. Her father was a monster to be slain and as a symbol of the other figures standing in the way of her fulfillment as an artist and a woman." (UTTER CRAP! Call it the Destruction of ART")

Another idea of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of

pansexualism’ ~ the search for pleasure,
the exploitation of the differences between the sexes,
the overthrowing of traditional relationships
between men and women.

WAIT, boys and girls, it gets even MORE DEVIOUS and EVIL! To further their aims they organized social movements to:

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance ~ hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’
This credo was part of the poison seeped into my generation during the feminist agenda by communist Jews Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem and Bella Azbug. Suddenly even our fathers ~ more often than not decent hard-working men who respected their wives and cared for their families ~ were painted as oppressors and our mothers oppressed because they stayed home to raise the families.

Today, the woman not only raises the family with varying degrees of assistance from her mate but she must also have a job to "maintain sense of self" as well as to just keep the family afloat financially.

One of the major problems faced was that the delicate balance of the male/female, father/daughter bond had to be destroyed. I would say a father playing with his daughter's vagina would qualify here, and cause such damage on every level of their mutual beings.

'We will make the West
so corrupt
that it stinks.'

German Government Publication

Promotes Incestuous Pedophilia

as Healthy Sex Ed

Micheal O'Brien, author on crisis of culture in West, says this "

German state intervention in family life is a new level of auto-destruction"

By John-Henry Westen
BERLIN, July 30, 2007

Booklets from a subsidiary of the German government's Ministry for Family Affairs encourage parents to sexually massage their children as young as 1 to 3 years of age.

Two 40-page booklets entitled "Love, Body and Playing Doctor" by the German Federal Health Education Center (Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung - BZgA) are aimed at parents ~ the first addressing children from 1-3 and the other children from 4-6 years of age.

Regarding 1-3 year old, authors rationalize:

"Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. Their caresses too seldom pertain to these regions, while this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in their sex. The child touches all parts of their father's body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same."

Canadian author and public speaker Michael O'Brien who has written and spoken extensively about the crisis of culture in the West spoke to about the shocking and extremely disturbing phenomenon. It is, he said, "State-encouraged incest, which in most civilized societies is a crime." The development is, he suggests, a natural outcome of the rejection of the Judeo-Christian moral order.

Changing nappies and wiping up a little bottom is one thing, a basic shared parental duty. But this, this, THIS! Is JUST PLAIN WRONG! On SOO many levels. Is sex the only way girls find price in who and what they are? Regarding a daughter’s privates, all a father needs to know is enough to be sure he has a daughter not a son. As for an adult father to be aroused by a child, that is just plain ridiculous.

No healthy man is so aroused. There is one group, a religion that endorses even encourages such things, but let them keep their vile ways to themselves. Maybe their rabbis cannot keep their hands and mouths off small children, but we Christians want NOTHING to do with what their Talmud encourages. Purely Satanic evil.



I am trying to counteract the filth you read with images of functioning happy families emphasizing fathers and daughters interacting in healthy constructive relationships.

"The imposed social revolution that has swept the western world is moving to a new stage as it works out the logical consequences of its view of man's value," said O'Brien. "It is merely obeying its strictly materialist philosophy of man. If man is no more than a creature created for pleasure or power, if he is no more than a cell in the social organism, then no moral standards, no psychological truths, no spiritual truths can refute the 'will to power' and the 'will to pleasure'."

The booklet advises the parents to provide the child with opportunities for unlimited masturbation" except where physical injury becomes apparent. I

t advises: "Children should learn that there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body. The body is a home, which you should be proud of."

For ages 4-6, the booklet recommends
teaching children
the movements of copulation.

Another product of the BZgA is a song book aimed at children of four and slightly older which includes several songs espousing masturbation. The song-book entitled "Nose, belly and bum" includes one song with the following (SICKKKKK!) lyrics:

"When I touch my body, I discover what I have. I have a vagina, because I am a girl. Vagina is not only for peeing. When I touch it, I feel a pleasant tingle."

The next step in personal evolution is
a transcendence of both
masculinity and femininity
to general humanness.

O'Brien said,

"The wiser and deeper position of most civilizations recognized that children need a period of innocence. Now the state, the German state, is encouraging destruction of this state of innocence.This is consistent with the materialist philosophy that sees all moral norms and all truths about human nature as repressive. Pleasure and their distorted concept of freedom are their only guiding principles."

According to the Polish daily newspaper Rzeczpospolita, the BZgA booklet is an obligatory read in nine German regions. It is used for training nursery, kindergarten and elementary school teachers. Ironically it is recommended by many organizations officially fighting pedophilia, such as the German Kunderschutzbund. BZgA sends out millions of copies of the booklet every year.

O'Brien warned:

"A society such as Germany's which is already in steep decline, indeed into degeneration, will only inherit the whirlwind of violence and further levels of degradation of their own people. It has happened before in Germany. It has happened in other nations. Different causes but the same dynamic, the rejection of the moral order of the created universe results in radical evil. The German state intervention in family life is a new level of auto-destruction."

Rzeczpospolita reports that the Eckhardt Scheffer of BZgA claimed that before releasing the manual the organization consulted parents, educators and child psychologists. 93% of whom gave a positive evaluation.

And just what were the criteria to qualify to make this evaluation? How was it worded? It is so very easy to do these things and receive the desired results just by verbal trickery.

Condom pillows and plushies for children. Who would like to open up this discussion first? They make the male member resemble an elongated happy face in fluff!

Don't forget the West Indies! Above.


I just came across the following article from the NEW YORK TIMES giving one aspect of sex ed for American kidlets! After yesterday discovering their promotion of "Opposite Marriage" into mainstream use, there really is little surprise there. This is more about educating children and having them learn about sexual matters at a young age so the parents are voluntarily involved to protect the children from a dirty old world.

But who is at the forefront of helping these parents? The Margaret Sanger Institute and Planned Parenthood, both serving the Rockefeller agenda of population control and the destruction of society. Immediately one is suspicious because the Rockefellers do nothing for altruistic purposes, nothing, ever.

New York Times
Jodi Kantor

November 17, 2005

THIS September 3-year-old Halley Vollmar of Bellmore, N.Y., was having her annual checkup when her pediatrician paused. "I'm going to check your peepee now," he warned, and tugged down her underwear.

But Halley protested. "Mommy, why he call my vagina a peepee?" she scolded, telling the startled physician he was a "silly doctor" before allowing him to proceed.

Last week Kristin Hansen, Halley's mother, recounted the story to several other women with a satisfied laugh. The gathering in Wantagh, N.Y., was something of a reunion. Over the summer the mothers had convened weekly for lessons in how to educate their toddlers about sex, a program they found so necessary they are already planning to reconvene next year.

Halley may be surprisingly articulate about her private parts, but she is in excellent company. Like many other parents and educators, the mothers chatting over lemonade and coffee cake in Susan Vartoukian's toy-strewn home maintain that sex education ~ once and mostly still an awkward fixture of the pubescent years ~ should begin early.

And when they say early, they mean it: preferably from birth, or if not that, from toilet training age. "Parents don't have the luxury of silence anymore," said Nanette Ecker, a sex educator at the Nassau County chapter of Planned Parenthood, who led the group.

For most adults, knowledge of intercourse came as a distinct moment of revelation: an "aha" moment in the schoolyard or the living room when the mysterious connection between body parts and babies was made suddenly and shockingly clear. But now children who are practically babies themselves are learning how babies are made.

These are not dress up play shoes; they were designed for little girls to wear.

According to this approach, toddlers should learn words like "vulva" at the same time they learn "ears" and "toes," benign-sounding myths about storks and seeds constitute harmful misinformation, and any child who can ask about how he or she was created is old enough for a truthful answer.

"People have been told by experts that there's a right age" to learn about intercourse, said Dr. Justin Richardson, a assistant professor of psychiatry at Cornell and Columbia medical schools and an author of "Everything You Never Wanted Your Kids to Know About Sex (But Were Afraid They'd Ask)," one of a number of recently published guides that advocates early tutelage.

"If you're talking about how babies are made, there's no age at which it is harmful to learn that the penis goes into the vagina," he said. "Yes, it's true that exposing a child to sexual stimulation is harmful. But telling a kid how babies are made is very different."

Satire only.

The general cultural environment has become so vulgar, the early-approach advocates say, that sex education has become a race: parents must reach children before other forces ~ from misinformed playground confidantes to pubescent-looking models posed in their skivvies ~ do. "We need to get there first," said Deborah M. Roffman, a sex educator and the author of "But How'd I Get in There in the First Place? Talking to Your Young Child About Sex."

If not, these advocates warn, children will gather their impressions anywhere and everywhere: from prime-time television jokes about threesomes, Internet pop-up ads for penis enlargement pills or even more explicit Web sites. When the Rev. Debra Haffner's son typed "Katrina images" into Google's search box for a school project, he ended up staring at photographs that had nothing to do with the hurricane, said Ms. Haffner, a Unitarian Universalist minister and the author of "From Diapers to Dating."

"When parents say to me, 'But my child is too young, I want to keep them safe and innocent for as long as I can,' I say, 'Do you take them grocery shopping?' " Ms. Haffner said, referring to the naughty poses and headlines featured on magazines at the checkout counter.

Early sex education is a small and hard-to-measure movement, but it's a growing one, with advocates like Ms. Roffman, Ms. Haffner and Dr. Richardson writing books and conducting seminars for parents, preschool teachers and day care providers. Many chapters of Planned Parenthood offer workshops on the topic and so do some evangelical Christian churches.

"The classic approach in religious circles has been, shield their innocence for as long as you can, until they're 13, then give them The Talk," said Stanton L. Jones, a professor of psychology and the provost of Wheaton College in Illinois. Dr. Stanton and his wife, Brenna Jones, wrote "The Story of Me," a sex education book for 3-to-5-year-olds. (The book emphasizes God's contribution and traditional gender roles, and says less about intercourse than many of its secular equivalents).

Lately the Joneses "have found a lot of acceptance" for starting sex education early, Mr. Jones said; pastors teach their approach at conferences on family life, and the book is sold by the conservative evangelical group Focus on the Family.

The American Psychological Association warns that suggestive toys and cartoons are creating an aura of early sexualization for girls which could be very psychologically damaging. Disney princesses start the process!

Robie H. Harris, a leading author of sex education books for children, started on the topic in 1994 with "It's Perfectly Normal" for preteenagers. (There are now 400,000 copies in print in the United States and more than a million worldwide.)

Since then she has found herself addressing progressively younger audiences: first with "It's So Amazing," geared to 7-year-olds and up, and now "It's Not the Stork," due this summer, and intended for children as young as 4. In 2008 she is to publish a volume aimed at 2½-year-olds. Her steady downward demographic shift, she said, is purely in response to parental demand. "Everyplace I would speak, I would hear, 'I don't know how to talk about this,' " Ms. Harris said.

On the whole, early sex education has attracted little organized resistance. While Ms. Harris's "It's Perfectly Normal" often appears on the American Library Association's annual list of most frequently challenged books ~ critics object to its references to homosexuality, contraception and masturbation ~ her work for younger children has drawn less attention. Perhaps this is because early sex education is a matter of parental choice or because the materials tend to concentrate on basic biology and safety.

Rather, the resistance comes from parents who cannot imagine initiating a conversation about sex with children who cannot read a book or ride a bicycle, and haven't yet displayed any curiosity about the matter. Rachel Wolman of Chevy Chase, Md., said she "would definitely not" sit her 3-year-old daughter down "for a birds-and-bees discussion."

American girls are increasingly being fed a steady diet of products and images that pressure them to be sexy. From clothing to cartoons, choreography to commercials, the emphasis on sexuality undercuts parents’ efforts to instill purity in their daughters.

"I'm guessing that kids wise up pretty quick by the time they get to 5," she added, "but even at that point, I'm not prepared to have a sit-down to run through how things work."

Jaymi Offir, a mother in Caldwell, N.J., said that introducing the topic to her daughter, Zoe, nearly 4, "would only confuse her."

"Being proactive at sex ed would be more appropriate for 9- or 10-year-olds," she said.

But even if parents of kindergarten-age children aren't prepared to discuss intercourse, early-childhood sex educators urge parents to abandon the usual litany of babyish names for private parts: the rather insulting "weenie" for boys, the murky "down there" for girls and so on. (A 1997 study in the journal Gender and Psychoanalysis showed that fewer girls are taught names for their genitals than boys, and that while girls learn the names of male genitals, the reverse is often not the case.)

When showing children their eyes and noses, "we don't say 'blink blink' or 'blow blow,'" said Ms. Ecker of Planned Parenthood.

It is not just the clothing for these "teen dolls" it is the provocative eyes, pouty lips and general posing that sends out a sexualized image to little girls. The American Psychological Association (APA) warns that this sexualization of girls is harmful to their self-image and healthy development. “[Girls are] experiencing teen pressures at younger and younger ages. However, they are not able to deal with these issues because their cognitive development is out of sync with their social, emotional and sexual development,” the APA reported. Tell THIS to the Europeans who push the programme in the above article!

Instead some toddlers are learning startlingly specific, biologically correct terms that even adults tend to confuse. "It's Not the Stork" includes a drawing of the vas deferens (the tubes that carry sperm); many educators emphasize the difference between the vagina (the tract that connects the uterus to the outside of the body) and the vulva (a collective term for all of the external female genital organs).

Early childhood sex educators also caution parents about never ~ no matter how mortifying the question ~ lying to children. Or feeding them benign-sounding half truths. Or even distracting them. "Kids have a right to have this information," Ms. Harris said. "If we ignore it, then the myths and fears start coming in."

The solution, they agree, is to give correct but simple answers. Parents have a tendency to blurt out more than what's needed: answering a question about nipples, say, with a flustered, halting lecture on sexual pleasure.

"If a child holds up a tampon and says, 'What's this?' " said Bill Taverner, the director of education for Planned Parenthood of Greater Northern New Jersey, "the best answer may just be, 'that's a tampon.' Having a name for something is sometimes enough."

Miley Cyrus is a name known to almost all. The sexy little Disney star sends out wholesome images as well as these. Knowing what I do about MK Ultra mind control, and industry, judging by the look in her eyes in 2 of these photos, she is either stoned or in an altered state. Millions of children strive to emulate this child/woman.

The early education approach has exaggerated the already wide disparities in what various kids know, and some arrive at school so fluent that they fluster their teachers. (Though some public elementary schools do teach sex education, especially HIV awareness, it's a scattered affair, varying enormously not only by state but by district and even classroom.)

Take Mr. Taverner's son Rob, whose first-grade teacher refused to hang on the bulletin board a drawing on which the child had scrawled, "Sex is when two married people join the egg and the sperm."

Even parents who have embraced this kind of frankness seem somewhat taken aback by it. Back in Wantagh, Diana Lee shook her head over the difference between the rich sexual education her daughter, Alexandra, already had, and the skimpy one she received as a child.

"I was surprised I had to tell her so much at 3 years old," she said. "I'm still waiting for The Talk," she added of her own parents' silence on the matter.

"It's a fun time at dinner now," Ms. Vartoukian, the host of the Wantagh gathering, said, gesturing at her two small boys. "We have The Talk every single night."

an illustrated book from Germany for toddlers.

"People have been told by experts that there's a right age. . . If you're talking about how babies are made, there's no age at which it is harmful to learn that the penis goes into the vagina . . . Yes, it's true that exposing a child to sexual stimulation is harmful. But telling a kid how babies are made is very different."

Telling them these things is one thing but drawing it out for them is another. At this age, children are, by nature NOT into sex adult fashion. IMHO they don't have to see everything at such tender years. I noticed that almost all of these sexual imagery toys and programmes seem to be geared towards the little girls although it does exist, just not on the same levels.

The final comment is made by the young man in this final illustration ; he who truly has his finger of the pulse of the male / female balance we ALL seek to fulfill our lives.


"Here you see a baby. Do you know how it came into the world ?"

"Here you see a mother and father. They are going to have a baby together."

"Here Father and Mother have no clothes on. You can see Mother's breasts and Mother's * . People call it the vagina. {* word for female genital that a child would use}

"You can see Daddy's **. People call it the penis. You can also see the little sack that he has between his legs; it is named 'scrotum'." {** word for male genital that a child would use}

"Mother and Father love each other very much. They kiss each other. Father's penis is growing large. It sticks out rigidly."

"Mother and Father would like for Father's penis to go into Mother's vagina. That is really beautiful."

"Mother and Father lie down on the bed. They put the penis in the vagina. They play with each other. Father and Mother rock to and fro."

"That is what people call intercourse. That can be very nice. That's how Mother and Father create a child, if they want to."

"Mother and Father love each other very much. They would like to have a child. There are many little sperms in the Father's little sack. When Father and Mother sleep together, the sperm cells come out of the penis."

"The sperm cells swim into the Mother's vagina, and come to a cavity in Mother's belly."

"This cavity is called the uterus. Sometimes there is is a little egg in it."

"Many, many days are passing by. Nine months have passed, since the little sperm and the egg have found each other. Now the child is so large that is wants to get out."

"Mother's belly has become so big that she almost doesn't fit into a dress anymore. 'I can feel my uterus contracting,' says the Mother to the Father. 'Soon I will give birth to our child.' "

Father drives Mother to the hospital.

"Mother lies in the hospital in a bed. The doctor comes and talks to Mother and Father. The doctor will help Mother with the birth of the child."

"Then the Mother begins to give birth. First the head of the child comes out of Mother's vagina . Then the arms of the child come out."

"Now the child has come all the way out of the Mother. The doctor has cut the umbilical cord. Also the placenta has come out. "

"Mother and Child rest for a few days. Then they come back home. If the child is hungry , it drinks milk from Mother's breasts."

Friday 30 October 2009



NYTimes dubs man-woman union:
'Opposite-sex marriage'

'Politicization aka political correctness
of language is nothing new,
but this
is particularly disturbing'




Brown bear, black bear. Not quite opposites.
By Chelsea Schilling
World Net Daily
October 27, 2009

OH But I was angered to see this title. Another stab in the back at the already copiously bleeding institute of heterosexual marriage, courtesy of the New York Times. In looking for an image of wedding cake toppers for this piece, I discovered that they just don't make cake decorations like they used to! One can choose from straight couples, gay couples, couples in chairs, animal couples, fantasy couples, biker couples, sexy couples, polygamous toppers, but only ONE opposite couple. And that by virtue of the fact He is a puppy, She is a kitten!

It would take a very special kind of man to see this on his wedding cake but they are sooo cute, and opposites.

Political correction is a serious topic and I am not making light of it. This wording is wrong, just plain wrong. The implications on various levels are deep and insidious.However, I hope some of these caketop couples bring a smile to your face.

Let me remind you that POLITICAL CORRECTNESS is one of the most diabolical Marxist creations ever devised. If you have not read my post or seen the film on political correctness and the extreme damage it can ~ AND IS ~ doing to our society, I think you would be well advised to look into how you are being socially manipulated to bring about changes that, chances are, you would never really wish to have come about.

Political correction is no more than the policing of the people by others so that they comply with social change due to fear tactics and are afraid to exercise their free speech. It is developing the art of "not seeing" what is unappealing as it takes over your society.

You will not be able to read this without becoming not only a tad ticked, but also amazed at, upon introspection of other such movements, how much has been slipped under our collective noses without us understanding the long term agenda behind each small step.

Please read this:

Quite the same.
Many Americans may be accustomed to hearing the term "same-sex marriage" in news reports about homosexual unions, but now the New York Times is also referring to traditional matrimony as "opposite-sex marriage."

He can walk. She cannot walk. They are opposites!

In his Oct. 26 news report on a homosexual lawsuit to overturn California's Proposition 8 reserving marriage for a man and a woman, New York Times reporter Adam Liptak described traditional unions as "opposite-sex marriage."

Referring to attorney Charles J. Cooper, who is pressing the case against recognition of homosexual marriage, Liptak wrote, "The government should be allowed to favor opposite-sex marriages, Mr. Cooper said, in order 'to channel naturally procreative sexual activity between men and women into stable, enduring unions.'"

Catholic League president Bill Donohue pointed out that the New York Times has used the term "opposite-sex marriage" 10 times in the past, and in a news story only five times. He also noted that the term was used on a few occasions in the 1990s by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Yale Law Journal and the New Republic.

"Is this the start of one more round of corrupting the English language?" Donohue asked in an editorial on the Catholic League website.

This group may soon want new laws to suit their polygamous marriage too!

He said use of the term reveals a distressing pattern.

"Here's how it will play out in the classroom: kindergartners will be told that some adults choose same-sex marriage and some choose opposite-sex marriage," Donohue wrote.

Those cell phones just have to go!

"There is no moral difference – it's just a matter of different strokes for different folks. Not mentioned, of course, will be that some male-on-male sex practices are dangerous. Nor will it be pointed out that only so-called opposite-sex marriages are capable of reproducing the human race.

"In other words, the kids will be lied to about what nature ordains."

Black and white, yet still the same.

While Donahue acknowledged that politicization of language is nothing new, he called the New York Times example "particularly disturbing."

"Marriage means one thing, and attempts to make it a smorgasbord are pernicious," he said.

Cake decorations from HelenRose Studio

Boy and girl. Puppy and kitty. Double opposites.

Might I, on a closing note, suggest this solution once again. Leave the word "marriage" where it has always been, with heterosexual, baby producing couples. Come up with another (very exciting) word for gay unions. Guarantee both groups the same rights and tax problems, whatever floats all the boats.

With this solution, no one need complain and the word "marriage" is left true to its original meaning, no
a new word subverted by that Marxist poison of "political correction." As a bonus, the sames get a new word, make history, and the pleasure of seeing it published into the law books, dictionaries, etc. It is a win/win all around!

The Best Win would be for us standing up against this gay tyranny that is being forced upon us all. We will not have our wish unless we ordinary folk take action and soon. The other evening I was playing a game with a group and KD Lang the cross dresser lesbian was the answer to the question. I made a comment about her wonderful singing but she defined the term gender bender. And gollleeee, if that did not upset a few who apparently promote this, and the two who were apparently in the process of discovering their Sapphic selves. Political correctness is the tool we have to learn to ignore.


Ashraf Abu Suleiman (Eva Bartlett)
Eva Bartlett
Gaza Strip
28 October 2009

On 4 October, Ashraf Abu Suleiman, a 16-year-old from Gaza's Jabaliya refugee camp, went to the northwest coast town of Sudaniya to visit an ill school friend. The teen then went to the sea, where he rolled up the legs of his pants, waded into the water and enjoyed the late summer morning. He took some photos of the sea and of the area around him, intending to play with the photos later on Photoshop, a hobby he and his father share.

Minutes later, Ashraf was running in blind terror as Israeli soldiers in a gunboat off the coast began shooting at Palestinian fishermen. He was hit by an Israeli soldier's bullet which bore through his neck and grazed his vertebrae, fracturing C-4 and C-5, leaving him bleeding on the ground and unable to stand up.

"They were shooting at Palestinian fishermen in hassakas [small fishing vessels]," he said of the Israeli soldiers in the gunboat. "Some of the bullets were hitting near where I stood. I started to run north. I didn't think about where to run, I just ran."

He estimates he ran for a few minutes, soon approaching the northern border before an Israeli soldier's voice shouted over a megaphone for him to stop. Seeing an Israeli military vehicle in the distance ahead, Ashraf was afraid that the soldiers north of him would start shooting. He kept running, hoping to take cover behind a low hill nearby.

Then he was grounded, one of the bullets hitting him in the neck.

The Ma'an news agency reported, "an Israeli military spokeswoman says soldiers identified a 'suspicious Palestinian man' approaching the border fence, and fired warning shots in the air. After the Palestinian ignored warning shots, the spokeswoman said, the army fired at and lightly injured him."

At least eight Palestinians have been killed and at least 33 injured in the Israeli-imposed "buffer zone" along Gaza's border since the 18 January ceasefire. Three of the killed and 12 of the injured were minors, including many children.

The "buffer zone" was imposed by Israeli authorities about a decade ago, initially at 150 meters and now, since Israeli authorities say the no-go zone runs 300 metres from the boundary between Gaza and Israel, it ranges up to two kilometers in some areas. The buffer zone renders off-limits approximately 30 percent of Gaza's most fertile agricultural land, as well as the land adjacent to it. Israeli authorities warn that anyone entering that area is subject to being shot by the Israeli army.

"I don't know how close I was, maybe less than 400 meters from the fence," Ashraf said.

Three Israeli soldiers approached him on foot, Ashraf explained. "An Israeli soldier kicked me in the mouth and told me to stand up. I couldn't, my legs wouldn't move."

According to Ashraf, an Israeli soldier dragged him by his arms over the rough ground. After another kick to the face, he was put on a stretcher and carried across the northern border to a waiting Israeli jeep.

After they checked his identity via computer, Ashraf said that the Israeli soldiers told him: "You're 16 years and one month old. You're a student." Although the soldiers realized that he was harmless, they continued to treat him with contempt.

"They put me in a jeep and we drove for a while, maybe 20 minutes, I don't know exactly. Then they transferred me to an Apache helicopter and flew me to a military base near Erez. I don't know the name but I know it wasn't so far from Erez. There was a small clinic there where they gave me a little first aid," he said, recalling that this treatment was at least 30 minutes after his injury.

"They put some gauze and bandaging on my neck wound," Ashraf said. He then was made to wait as a Palestinian medic negotiated his return to a Gaza hospital.

Hassam Ghrenam, a Palestine Red Crescent Society medic and ambulance driver, had approval to cross into Israel for two medical cases unrelated to Ashraf. While on the Israeli side, Ghrenam saw Ashraf and requested to take him back to Gaza.

Ashraf explained that Ghrenam wanted to bring three other men, to transfer him carefully as medical procedure dictates. The Israeli soldiers refused the request and Ashraf had to wait for more than an hour until the soldiers finally relented.

"There were maybe 30 Israeli soldiers around us. The ambulance driver kept saying, 'he's critical, very critical, take him to Israel,' but the soldiers just pointed their guns at him and did nothing," Ashraf explained.

Ghrenam noted that there was blood and signs that Ashraf was beaten or kicked in the face. According to Ghrenam, "The Israelis only put a bandage on his wound, no neck collar, no proper treatment. I immediately put a neck collar on him. Injuries to the neck and spinal cord can lead to paralysis."

At the Palestinian side of the Erez crossing, Ghrenam passed Ashraf to a waiting Red Crescent ambulance which immediately transferred the youth to Gaza's al-Shifa hospital. He is now in the al-Wafa rehabilitation hospital, and doctors and Ashraf's parents wait to see whether his fractured vertebrae will heal well enough so he can walk again.

Ashraf's father is not optimistic. "Every day we wait I feel like his life is withering. I'm worried about his future."

Lately I have been writing about different aspects of the Jewish problem and although I am still emotionally involved and support Palestinians, etc, I have not been reporting these "small" examples of the delightful ways of the Zionists. I looked at them as just more signs of their disease, manifestations of an over all problem surfacing. I wanted to see what made them be as they are. I read this and was tempted to put in a lot of little Snippits and Snappits, but that would serve nothing other than to vent.

We all know these soldiers don't give a damn. We all know 95% of them think they were born to kill Palestinians. We all know they operate in a Communist country that parades as a "democracy" and have been Bolshevik trained and schooled all of their lives. Everything for Mother Israel!

If you have the time, PLEASE read the 14 piece book I just put up this week. The author pulls together Communism, Judaism and you understand just how ancient Babylon is STILL the way of the Jews. The sorcery, the dark magic, the inhuman pagan rituals, it is all still there. The book is called

I guarantee that you will know and understand so much more of what we are up against and that is a good thing. In the meantime, we pray for this young man and strive for improvement in that part of the world.

Honestly,I know it is politically incorrect, but I do not see change any time soon. The mindset these people have is NOT like ours, not at all. It is important that we learn this and understand how they think so we can deal with them more effectively. What they do to Palestine is NOTHING compared to their plans for all of us. Palestine, tragic as it is, is "just" a trial run

The Zionists must be bested on the international scale before they will allow us to clean up their back yard. They certainly will not stop their aggressive foul ways until THEY are hungry and deprived. For the moment they are frightened and fighting for their lives on the world stage. We must do all we can to keep up the pressure.

Learn their Talmud. I know it is not a pleasant thing to learn how unholy their scriptures are. One feels befouled upon learning its contents. But it is necessary. If the contents of their unholy book, and their rabbies, er rabbis, were exposed for what they really are, more people would be intolerant of this situation they impress upon the entire planet.

Until you know the contents, you have no idea of their ways and believe me, it is good information to have because 3/4 of their strength is in KNOWING we do not think as as they. We come from decency and honour. They see such things as weaknesses to be exploited. So it is your choice, remain innocent and wonder why why why, or know and feel a bit more effective in dealing with the crud they constantly throw at us. THEN cry antisemitism if we shower and glare back at them!

Eva Bartlett is a Canadian human rights advocate and freelancer who arrived in Gaza in November 2008 on the third Free Gaza Movement boat. She has been volunteering with the International Solidarity Movement and documenting Israel's ongoing attacks on Palestinians in Gaza. During Israel's recent assault on Gaza, she and other ISM volunteers accompanied ambulances and documenting the Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip.