of language is nothing new,
is particularly disturbing'
World Net Daily
October 27, 2009
OH But I was angered to see this title. Another stab in the back at the already copiously bleeding institute of heterosexual marriage, courtesy of the New York Times. In looking for an image of wedding cake toppers for this piece, I discovered that they just don't make cake decorations like they used to! One can choose from straight couples, gay couples, couples in chairs, animal couples, fantasy couples, biker couples, sexy couples, polygamous toppers, but only ONE opposite couple. And that by virtue of the fact He is a puppy, She is a kitten!
Let me remind you that POLITICAL CORRECTNESS is one of the most diabolical Marxist creations ever devised. If you have not read my post or seen the film on political correctness and the extreme damage it can ~ AND IS ~ doing to our society, I think you would be well advised to look into how you are being socially manipulated to bring about changes that, chances are, you would never really wish to have come about.
Political correction is no more than the policing of the people by others so that they comply with social change due to fear tactics and are afraid to exercise their free speech. It is developing the art of "not seeing" what is unappealing as it takes over your society.
You will not be able to read this without becoming not only a tad ticked, but also amazed at, upon introspection of other such movements, how much has been slipped under our collective noses without us understanding the long term agenda behind each small step.
Please read this:
In his Oct. 26 news report on a homosexual lawsuit to overturn California's Proposition 8 reserving marriage for a man and a woman, New York Times reporter Adam Liptak described traditional unions as "opposite-sex marriage."
Referring to attorney Charles J. Cooper, who is pressing the case against recognition of homosexual marriage, Liptak wrote, "The government should be allowed to favor opposite-sex marriages, Mr. Cooper said, in order 'to channel naturally procreative sexual activity between men and women into stable, enduring unions.'"
Catholic League president Bill Donohue pointed out that the New York Times has used the term "opposite-sex marriage" 10 times in the past, and in a news story only five times. He also noted that the term was used on a few occasions in the 1990s by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Yale Law Journal and the New Republic.
This group may soon want new laws to suit their polygamous marriage too!
He said use of the term reveals a distressing pattern.
"Here's how it will play out in the classroom: kindergartners will be told that some adults choose same-sex marriage and some choose opposite-sex marriage," Donohue wrote.
Those cell phones just have to go!
"There is no moral difference – it's just a matter of different strokes for different folks. Not mentioned, of course, will be that some male-on-male sex practices are dangerous. Nor will it be pointed out that only so-called opposite-sex marriages are capable of reproducing the human race.
"In other words, the kids will be lied to about what nature ordains."
Black and white, yet still the same.
While Donahue acknowledged that politicization of language is nothing new, he called the New York Times example "particularly disturbing."
"Marriage means one thing, and attempts to make it a smorgasbord are pernicious," he said.
Might I, on a closing note, suggest this solution once again. Leave the word "marriage" where it has always been, with heterosexual, baby producing couples. Come up with another (very exciting) word for gay unions. Guarantee both groups the same rights and tax problems, whatever floats all the boats.
With this solution, no one need complain and the word "marriage" is left true to its original meaning, no a new word subverted by that Marxist poison of "political correction." As a bonus, the sames get a new word, make history, and the pleasure of seeing it published into the law books, dictionaries, etc. It is a win/win all around!
The Best Win would be for us standing up against this gay tyranny that is being forced upon us all. We will not have our wish unless we ordinary folk take action and soon. The other evening I was playing a game with a group and KD Lang the cross dresser lesbian was the answer to the question. I made a comment about her wonderful singing but she defined the term gender bender. And gollleeee, if that did not upset a few who apparently promote this, and the two who were apparently in the process of discovering their Sapphic selves. Political correctness is the tool we have to learn to ignore.