With
Deference to all Scientists: this Research Report has been written for all
students and non-scientists to understand.
By Barrie Trower
August 24, 2013
ED Noor: Here are a few quotes from previous postings on this extremely important health issue. People hate it when I tell them why I refuse to own a cell phone! Sadly they cannot disagree with a word I say. There are too many reasons to list not the least of which is the breakdown of communication between people but in this case we learn of the health risks that have resulted in some countries having WiFi pulled out of the classroom altogether.
By Barrie Trower
August 24, 2013
ED Noor: Here are a few quotes from previous postings on this extremely important health issue. People hate it when I tell them why I refuse to own a cell phone! Sadly they cannot disagree with a word I say. There are too many reasons to list not the least of which is the breakdown of communication between people but in this case we learn of the health risks that have resulted in some countries having WiFi pulled out of the classroom altogether.
Communications antennas now blast the human habitat with many different electromagnetic frequencies simultaneously. Human DNA hears this energetic cacophony loud and clear, reacting like the human ear would to high volume country music, R&B plus rock and roll screaming from the same speaker. Irradiated cells struggle to protect themselves against this destructive dissonance by hardening their membranes. They cease to receive nourishment, stop releasing toxins, die prematurely and spill micronuclei fragments into a sort of "tumour bank account."This is precisely how microwave radiation prematurely ages living tissues.
Russia's public exposure standards are 100 times more stringent than ours
because Russian scientists have consistently shown that, at U.S. exposure
levels, humans develop pathological changes in heart, kidney, liver and brain
tissues, plus cancers of all types.
All life pulsates in time to the earth and our artificial fields cause abnormal reactions in all organisms.
A nation that requires compulsory mass irradiation to fuel its trivial entertainment needs is surely destined to have a sickly and short-lived population.
THE RADIATION POISONING OF AMERICA ~ PT 1
CELL PHONES ARE DANGEROUS BUT THIS MAY BE WORSE
All life pulsates in time to the earth and our artificial fields cause abnormal reactions in all organisms.
A nation that requires compulsory mass irradiation to fuel its trivial entertainment needs is surely destined to have a sickly and short-lived population.
America
must decide whose rights
are more important ~ idlers beaming death rays
for piddling gibberish
or the elderly with pacemakers
who are made ill
by cell phone and tower radiation
wherever they go.
are more important ~ idlers beaming death rays
for piddling gibberish
or the elderly with pacemakers
who are made ill
by cell phone and tower radiation
wherever they go.
THE RADIATION POISONING OF AMERICA ~ PT 1
CELL PHONES ARE DANGEROUS BUT THIS MAY BE WORSE
2013As
stated by University Researchers, Government Scientists and International
Scientific Advisors; a minimum of 57.7% of schoolgirls exposed to low-level
microwave radiation (Wi-fi) are at risk of suffering stillbirth, foetal
abnormalities or genetically damaged children, when they give birth. Any
genetic damage may pass to successive generations.
WIFI ~ A THALIDOMIDE IN THE MAKING ~ WHO CARES?
Professor
John R Goldsmith, International / Advisor Consultant for R.F. Communication,
Epidemiology and Communications Sciences Advisor to the World Health
Organisation, Military and University Advisor, Researcher; wrote concerning the
low level exposure of microwave irradiation (below thermal level) incident upon
women:
“Of the microwave-exposed women, 47.7% had miscarriages prior to week 7 of pregnancy.” (1)
The
level of irradiation incident upon the women was stated, as from, five
microwatts per centimetre squared. This level of irradiation may seem
meaningless to a non-scientist; however, when I say that it is below what most
schoolgirls will receive in a classroom of Wi-Fi transmitters, from the age of
approximately five years upwards, this level becomes more meaningful.
A
distinction here must be made and a very important one: schoolgirls are not
women. Schoolgirls are children and children are both neurologically and
physiologically different from adults. A child’s brain tissue / bone marrow has
different electrical conductivity properties than adults due to the higher
water content (2)
(this renders the Specific Absorption Rate obsolete).
Children’s absorption of microwave radiation can be ten times higher than adults.Permanent low-level microwave exposure can induce chronic nitrosative and oxidative ‘stress’ thence, damage the cellular mitochondria (mitochondropathy). This ‘stress’ can cause irreversible mitochondrial DNA damage (mitochondrial DNA is ten times more susceptible to oxidative and nitrosative ‘stress’ than the DNA in the cell nucleus).
Mitochondrial DNA is irreparable due to its low histone protein content; therefore any damage (genetic or otherwise) can be transmitted to all successive generations through the maternal line. (3)
Hence,
we are subjecting each successive female generation to harm. Whether these two
ten-fold increases ‘merge’ to become 57.7% or are additional, thence equal
67.7% of those to suffer, is a moot point. Either way we are facing the
equivalent of a pandemic.
I
was invited to present a lecture at Brighton University recently and one Doctor
commented on a +60% foetal birth rate damage from exposed farm animals. All
mammalian species will of course suffer the same consequence resulting from
low-level microwave irradiation. There is very little difference ‘biologically’
between our embryonic cells.
I invite the Reader to peruse my diagram and / or read my simple explanation concerning the microwaving of the ovarian follicles in schoolgirls.
I invite the Reader to peruse my diagram and / or read my simple explanation concerning the microwaving of the ovarian follicles in schoolgirls.
SIMPLE EXPLANATION
Imagine you are five years old, in school and sitting with a Wi-Fi laptop near your abdomen. Theoretically, your ovaries can become irradiated until you leave school at aged 16-18 years old. When you become pregnant, every one of your follicles (to become eggs) will have been microwaved. Hence, you may or may not deliver a healthy child.
Should you become a pregnant as a student, your embryo (for its first 100 days if it is female) is producing approximately 400,000 follicles (within its ovaries) for future child-birth.
The problem is that these developing follicle cells do not have the cellular protection of mature adult cells. Consequently your ‘Grandchild’ may have had every single follicle cell irradiated and damaged prior to its conception. Therefore when your child becomes an adult (with its irradiated follicles) there is a greater likelihood of its child (your Grand-daughter) suffering the ailments previously mentioned, during conception / embryonic and foetal development stages.
Imagine you are five years old, in school and sitting with a Wi-Fi laptop near your abdomen. Theoretically, your ovaries can become irradiated until you leave school at aged 16-18 years old. When you become pregnant, every one of your follicles (to become eggs) will have been microwaved. Hence, you may or may not deliver a healthy child.
Should you become a pregnant as a student, your embryo (for its first 100 days if it is female) is producing approximately 400,000 follicles (within its ovaries) for future child-birth.
The problem is that these developing follicle cells do not have the cellular protection of mature adult cells. Consequently your ‘Grandchild’ may have had every single follicle cell irradiated and damaged prior to its conception. Therefore when your child becomes an adult (with its irradiated follicles) there is a greater likelihood of its child (your Grand-daughter) suffering the ailments previously mentioned, during conception / embryonic and foetal development stages.
Please enlarge to read.
BEYOND BELIEF
The shocking truth is, not only was all of this known and documented long before Wi-Fi was ever put in front of children, but the dangerous biological effects were concealed (as they are to this day) from the general public, in order to protect the industries’ profit.
Professor Goldsmith writes:
“.....effects from exposure to RF radiation in certain populations: reproductive effects.....increased spontaneous abortion.....increased incidence of childhood and other cancers.....” (1)Confirming this with more than 2000 references is the Naval Medical Research Institute in their document: ‘Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (Effects) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation’ highlight ‘......Altered Menstrual Activity / Altered Foetal Development.....’ (4)
The World Health Organization’s ‘International Symposium’ Research Agreement No. 05-609-04 ‘Biological Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation’ emphasizes in its 350 pages: Biological effects, health and excess mortality from artificial irradiation of Radio Frequency Microwaves. Section 28 deals with problems concerning Reproductive Function.
This document was classed as ‘Top Secret’ and its contents withheld by WHO and ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection). (5)
Eldon Byrd, a scientist for the Naval Surface Weapon Centre of the US Navy, in one of his 1986 lectures on the effects of low-level microwaves, is referenced as stating:
‘.....we can alter the behaviour of cells, tissue.....cause up to six times higher foetus mortality and birth defects....’. (6)Finally, the Mobile Telecommunications Industry carried out a very thorough and exhaustive scientific study on its own product. This industries conclusion was:Sec. 7
“.....it can be concluded that electro-magnetic fields with frequencies in the mobile telecommunications range do play a role in the development of cancer
“.....Direct damage on the DNA as well as influences on the DNA synthesis and DNA repair mechanisms.....” (7)
With
these few of the roughly 8000 research articles showing this phenomena; in
order to protect this industries’ profit, the United States Defence
Intelligence Agency sent a ‘document’ to ‘advanced nations’ describing the
problem and suggesting ‘how to deceive
the public’.
It read:
“.....if the more advanced nations of the West are strict in the enforcement of stringent exposure standards, there could be unfavourable effects on industrial output.....exposed to microwave radiation below thermal levels experience more.....” (8)NB: Industrial output is of course...profit. A very relaxed exposure standard also makes it very difficult to take the industry to court.
This
(and two other documents with ref. 8) then continues to list many physiological
and neurological dangers from low-level: below thermal, microwave irradiation
including blood disorders, heart problems, psychiatric symptoms and ‘menstrual
disorders’.*Wi-fi is of course, below thermal low-level microwave irradiation.*In order to appease the US Government, some Governments adopted the ICNIRP guideline, whereby, the only safety limit is just six-minutes of warming. Which means: if you do not feel too warm in six minutes, Wi-Fi is deemed to be safe.
No consideration at all has been given to the published ‘below thermal’ cellular interaction as listed by several countries including the United States; which were (and are) known to cause: cancer, severe neuro-pathological symptoms, foetal defects and literally hundreds of illnesses related to cellular disorders.
.
Countries
following ICNIRP continue to argue that their six minute warming effect is all
that is required regarding microwave irradiation.
Should the Reader be wondering whether I am ‘as mad as a box of frogs’ and thinking ‘no government would ever harm its citizens for money, especially pregnant women’; I invite the Reader to investigate Government decisions behind: smoking, asbestos, BSE (mad-cow disease), lead in petrol, experiments on 20,000 UK serving military personnel serving in the 1960’s, thalidomide and of course Agent Orange sprayed over the food crops in Vietnam. To this day, many global birth defects stem from these Government / Government Scientific / Military decisions: with industrial advisors.
Should the Reader be wondering whether I am ‘as mad as a box of frogs’ and thinking ‘no government would ever harm its citizens for money, especially pregnant women’; I invite the Reader to investigate Government decisions behind: smoking, asbestos, BSE (mad-cow disease), lead in petrol, experiments on 20,000 UK serving military personnel serving in the 1960’s, thalidomide and of course Agent Orange sprayed over the food crops in Vietnam. To this day, many global birth defects stem from these Government / Government Scientific / Military decisions: with industrial advisors.
If further evidence is required, I invite the Reader to read documents released under the Freedom of Information Act; namely, Operations: Pandora, MK Ultra, MK Chaos, Cointelpro, MK Delta, MK Naomi, MK Search, Bluebird, Artichoke, Chatter, Sleeping Beauty and Grill Flame.
Here, secret experiments carried out by the Military / Government scientists upon unsuspecting civilians, namely: students, servicemen, psychiatric patients, poor, children over the age of 4 years, pregnant women, Muslims, Catholics, prisoners, handicapped, deaf, blind, homosexuals, single women, elderly, school children, ‘marginal groups’ and dissidents; served to increase their knowledge and understanding of; what is commonly known as...Stealth Warfare.
Progress
on the study of illnesses caused by low-level microwave irradiation continues
to this day. One current study on cancer and neurological harm continues until
2018 and involves women who could be pregnant. (9)
Progress Reports are also fed back to Governmental Scientists:
Progress Reports are also fed back to Governmental Scientists:
“.....students will understand the nature of RF...bioeffects research, including human / animal studies.....students will become familiar with current state of knowledge on potential health effects RF, such as cancer, memory loss, and birth defects.” (10)
NB:
RF has become a generic term (Radio Frequency) to avoid using the term
‘microwave’. It poses less ‘safety queries’ as the word ‘radio’ itself, which
used to refer to ‘long wave radio’ was domestically non threatening.
.
ED Noor: Do you remember this story? .
STUDENT SCIENCE EXPERIMENT FINDS PLANTS WON'T GROW NEAR WI-FI ROUTER
INTENTIONAL IGNORANCE
overnmental
Intransigence forces a moratorium upon the risks of exposure to future
generations. Both the Communications Industry and Governmental studies have
proved that protein synthesis (the using of chemical structures to ‘build’ the
roughly 4050 foetal and 4500 adults designated biological / neurological
structures) can be influenced by low-level microwave irradiation. This
moratorium seems to spread to organizations either relying on Governmental
funding, or for whatever reason; acquiescence. However, not all research
departments suppress the truth.
A brilliant paper published by Dundee University confirms that low-level microwave irradiation, unable to cause any heating (thermal) effect, can affect cellular signalling processes. (11)
A brilliant paper published by Dundee University confirms that low-level microwave irradiation, unable to cause any heating (thermal) effect, can affect cellular signalling processes. (11)
THE MAIN RISKS TO CHILDREN
These
biological processes described as being ‘influenced’ by low-level microwave
irradiation may not just damage foetal growth; relying on the same biological
processes are:
Blood Brain Barrier requires 18 months to form and protects the brain from toxins. It is known to be effected.
Myelin Sheath requires 22 years to build its 122 layers. It is responsible for all thinking, organ and muscle processes.
Brain requires 20 years to develop (I can assure you, cell phones do not help in its development).
Immune System requires 18 years to develop. Bone marrow and Bone Density are known to be affected by low-level microwaves as are the immune systems’ white blood cells.
Bones requires 28 years to develop as mentioned the moisture content of children makes both the ‘soft bones’ and marrow particularly attractive to microwave irradiation. Bone marrow produces blood cells.
Clearly,
our decision makers are overlooking a child illness pandemic hitherto unknown
in our 40,000 generations of civilization; which can involve over a half of the
World’s exposed mothers / children.
THE VERY SAD TRUTH
I have been very honoured to address approximately 40 Royals, Governments, Leaders of Governments, Leaders of Peoples and Government Officials over the years.
I have been very honoured to address approximately 40 Royals, Governments, Leaders of Governments, Leaders of Peoples and Government Officials over the years.
My
address (text) to one King concerning the numbers of ill children was placed on
the internet. (12)
I
referenced over 200 cancer / leukaemia clusters in schools (up to the time of
data collection) from low level microwave transmitters in schools. There were
many different types of cancers, leukaemias, miscarriages and breast cancers of
staff. These continue, mostly only recorded locally, to this day.
When
this was discussed in the English Parliament (as one of the EU Countries
involved), a Minister dismissed it and lied to the House of Commons. My request
to prove this lie was denied.
Possibly,
the most respected children’s charity in the World: UNICEF, joined forces with
the World’s leading authority on the effects of harm from low-level microwave
irradiation:
The Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: in their research document ‘Health Effect on Children and Teenagers’ found:NB. The Reader may think that the cell phone irradiation is different from Wi-Fi as it has more power. In fact Wi-Fi can be more harmful because of its lower power! Low power can enter the body and cause harm. All electromagnetic waves are accumulative. If they are below the body’s threshold to cause activation of the necessary proteins required to defend and repair tissues, the damage accumulates very slowly and is undetectable like a cancer. Think of sunbathing on a cloudy day, you can still burn your skin.
85% increase in Central Nervous System Disorders
36% increase in epilepsy
11% increase in mental retardation
82% increase in blood immune disorders and Risk to Foetus. (13)
THE GOOD GUYS
I
have a list of nine countries (some of whom I am working with) who are
actively, either taking Wi-Fi out of schools or in the legal argument-stage of
this process. I decline to publically name these countries as my actions may
interfere with their legal negotiations.
The
Parliamentary Assembly (Assemblee Parlimentaire) Council of Europe Document
12608, published on 6.5.2011 in section 8.3.2. states:
‘.....ban all mobile phones, DECTphones or Wi-Fi or WLAN systems from classrooms and schools.....’
For
legal reasons this had to be changed to a ‘wired system is preferred’. However,
the meaning is clear.
In
a translated document, Professor Yuri Grigoriev of the Russian Committee for
Non Ionizing Radiation Protection wrote on 19.6.2012
‘.....recommend the use of wired networks and not networks using the wireless broadband access systems, including Wi-Fi, in schools and educational establishments.’
WA
document dated 25.3.2013 (updated from 19.3.2013) by the Executive Committee of
the American Academy of Environmental Medicine wrote a letter to the Los
Angeles Unified School District with the following recommendation:
‘.....do not add to the burden of public health by installing blanket wireless internet connections in Los Angeles Schools.’
Just
prior to this in December 2012 the American Academy of Paediatrics
(representing 60,000 Paediatricians) wrote to Congress requesting more
protection from low-level microwave irradiation for children and pregnant
women: with regard to Wi-Fi in schools, they write:
‘.....this is an unprecedented exposure with unknown outcome on the health and reproductive potential of a generation.’ (14)
In
2002, 36,000 Physicians and Scientists etc. signed the ‘Freiburg Appeal’. Ten
years hence, it has been re-launched. It specifically warns against the use of
Wi-fi and the irradiation of children, adolescents and pregnant women.
‘Freiburg’ is an International Doctors’ Appeal.
The
Reader will appreciate that collectively there are approximately 100,000 of the
World’s most knowledgeable professionals expostulating this same warning.
As an aside, should the Reader be wondering why I have not mentioned school-boys and whether they can be affected in a similar way to girls: the answer is ‘yes’.
DNA
sperm fragmentation from Wi-Fi levels of irradiation, have been published. (15) It would require many more pages to
comment upon this phenomenon and there is already a plethora of data both
available and published.
PULSING / MODULATIONS
During the ‘Cold War’ conflict, whilst I was collating effects from
microwave pulses / modulations caused by brain entrainment, resonance (both
cyclotronic and circadian), rectification (at boundaries within the body)
generated by electrically induced phase transition; it came to my attention
that a list needed to be published for all microwave communication systems. (16)
In this Open Letter, I list 1 to 40 Hz (pulses / modulations per second)
and their corresponding neurological / physiological response.
In his most explanatorily descriptive paper, Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy writes.....
In his most explanatorily descriptive paper, Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy writes.....
‘.....For example, Grigoriev et. Al. (2010) showed that 30 days exposure to unmodulated 2450 MHz microwave radiation triggered a small but significant increase in anti-brain antibodies in the blood of rats.....which could then result in an auto immune attack on the brain and / or nervous system. An example of an auto immune disease of the brain is Graves disease in which the pituitary gland (at the base of the brain) is affected.’ (17)
NB. 2450 M Hz is the Wi-Fi frequency.
If you add the pulse / modulation frequency to the above; fatigue,
depression, psychiatric problems (such as anger), loss of appetite and problems
with movement can also be induced.
THE BAD GUYS
With gargantuan profits to be made, it is of no surprise that the
English Parliamentary system choose to follow ICNIRP and their well established
‘Active Denial’ policy.
I became familiar with our ‘corruption’ when during the late 60’s
70’s, I was commissioned to investigate (under a programme initiated by Sir
William Melvin (1911)) corruption within the hierarchy of the London
Metropolitan Police and the non-elected Members of the English Parliament.
Should the Reader be dismissive of such actions, I suggest looking at any of
our Sunday newspapers over the past 45 years, including now.
When a Reverend lady wrote to a Minister, Nick Gibb MP, concerning Wi-fi
in schools, his standard reply (which I have seen many times) stated:
“.....advice given.....by UK Health Protection Agency..... ‘There is no consistent evidence of health effects from RF exposures below guideline levels and no reason why schools and others should not use Wi-fi equipment.” (18)
This
letter is designed to deceive (and it is very successful). Look to the words
‘no consistent evidence’. Let me explain please.
If I were to carry out an experiment on every single person who went through the doors of your main airport on any busy day and told them that they must drink one pint of beer and smoke ten cigarettes a day forever; some would react immediately, especially children. Others would react over days, weeks, months and years (many years in some cases). Then there would be those who would thoroughly enjoy the experiment and probably never be ill. That does not mean that alcohol and cigarettes are safe. It shows that people are not homogenous (all alike / identical). In other words, the conclusion of my experiment would be that there is: ‘no consistent evidence’.
Other
Ministerial letters usually say: “most
of our research” or “most of
our scientists” - both of which are equally meaningless.
WHAT THEY NEVER SAY IS:
WI-FI IS SAFE.
It
will come as no surprise to the Reader to learn that I have been refused
permission to have a face-to-face meeting with my MP, Mr Mel Stride. Hence my
Member of Parliament has successfully brought the ‘shutters down’ on any access
I may have had to Government. This act by Mr Stride became a ‘feature’ in our
West Country newspaper by leading Journalist Paul James. (19)
During
my last attempt to contact my MP, his Secretary, Dominic just hung-up the
telephone on me.
Years
ago, when I started to ‘advise caution’ re microwaving children / pregnant
women; the Academic Registrar of my own University (Exeter) forbade me from
ever communicating with it, ever again. A similar message came from Dr. Jamie
Harle of the Open University (Medical Physics), who said: “Your work is too political.”
Clearly in England, some universities and some parliamentary persons are more afraid of governmental ‘reprisals’ than telling the truth. Regardless of the consequences.
Clearly in England, some universities and some parliamentary persons are more afraid of governmental ‘reprisals’ than telling the truth. Regardless of the consequences.
TWO WOMENS’ STORIES
The
Real Price of Intentional Ignorance and Greed. Those Consequences.
Ten
telephone calls a day would not be unusual for me. I even receive calls
Christmas Day / Easter Sunday. Two calls which summarize those from women are
illustrated below. Both are actual conversations.
1. “.....my daughter had just died. I am holding her hand. She has just had her 11 birthday and she was number 11 to die since the transmitter for Wi-fi was put near her and others’ desk.....”
2. “.....my child is one of several with cancer / birth genetic problems. These only started after the transmitter was turned on. My worries are two-fold and take every second of my life. Will my child ever marry or find a partner and be happy? What will happen when I die? I know I will die worrying. Regardless of who is to blame, it is me, the Mother who carries guilt and responsibility.....” (20)
I ASK FOR READERS’ HELP, PLEASE.
Imagine
57.7% of all of the schoolgirls with Wi-fi in their classrooms: all day all
year all through their school career, in every country using it, in the
World!
In just two generations we could have more dead / sick infants than resulted from both World Wars. And, these are not my figures; they come from Government advisors / research.
Advanced
requests for this ‘Paper’ have been received from Royalty, Governmental
Officers (outside of the UK) and people I will describe as ‘interesting’.
As
shutters fall blocking every direction I try to turn, I ask: “Can the Reader succeed in preventing this
‘Pandemic’ where I will fail?”
INTERNATIONAL CHALLENGEI have two requests:Would a Royal or Leading Governmental Official please ask the British Prime Minister, face to face, why he told my MP, Mr Stride, that he is ‘too busy’ to see me for just one hour to discuss this issue.If every Reader sends just two copies of this Paper to people who may be able make a decision (preferably influential women); with mathematical progression ~ the original 100 advanced requests will soon land on a desk of somebody who can make a difference.
When
I am invited to speak in countries, I invariably end up on the radio / TV news
/ documentary channels. Thence, I issue a challenge:
I
ask for any scientist(s) from industry / government to ‘humiliate’ me live
‘on-air’ with their expert knowledge by answering one question:
“What is the safe level of microwave irradiation for the ovarian follicles during the first 100 days development of the embryo?”To date, not a single scientist will appear and face me.
I
mention this because it is a question the Reader can ask any decision maker,
school Principal / Governor etc.
Should
any person provide the answer, the next statement is:
“Fine ~we will send it to a Leading
Scientific Journal for independent Peer Review.” (With your research). (21)
THE SOLUTION
Education
need not suffer if Wi-fi is withdrawn world-wide. We have telephone lines ~
fibre-optic cable.
The
argument against these options is the cost. Compared to the future medical
costs (forgetting the human cost), phone / fibre-cable shows to be a very cheap
option.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Barrie Trower
3 Flowers Meadow
Liverton
Devon TQ12 6UP
United Kingdom
In UK - 01626 821014
World 00 44 1626 821014
September 1 2013
(This Paper is copyright free)
Epilogue
Please
note ~ I have always worked free of charge and will represent any person in the
world without cost. PLEASE SEE ADDENDUM
ADDENDUM ~ RECENT PUBLICATIONS
Professors’ / Doctors’ Panagopoulos, Johnasson and Carlo describe in their (June 2013 Published) Paper~ how man-made electromagnetic waves (as used in the communications industry) can cause interference, hence induced oscillations, from these polarized waves.
This in turn, can induce biological alterations and render the SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) obsolete.
They write:
Professors’ / Doctors’ Panagopoulos, Johnasson and Carlo describe in their (June 2013 Published) Paper~ how man-made electromagnetic waves (as used in the communications industry) can cause interference, hence induced oscillations, from these polarized waves.
This in turn, can induce biological alterations and render the SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) obsolete.
They write:
~ Man-made electromagnetic waves...they are polarized...~ .... can produce interference effect...This induced oscillation will be most intense on the free particles which carry a net electric charge...a part of its energy...is transferred to the charged / polar molecules of the medium...within biological tissue there will be additional energy absorption by the water dipoles...proteins, lipids or nucleic acids, which will also be forced to oscillate by the applied field.~ .... man-made EMF’s can produce severe biological alterations such as DNA damage without heating the biological tissue...may lead to cancer, neurodegenerative deceases, reproductive declines or even heritable mutations...conductivity varies for different tissues and different field frequencies..The relative permittivity of an adult brain is calculated to be around 40 while the corresponding value for a young child’s brain is between 60 and 80 resulting in almost double the radiation absorption and SAR...~ ... SAR offers no information at all with respect to frequency, waveform or modulation... (Ref (22))
Dr
Dimitris Panagopoulos, Dep. of Biology, University of Athens also writes in his
2013 paper: Electromagnetic Interaction Between Environmental Fields and Living
Systems Determines Health and Well Being:
~ Disturbances in the communication between individual body clocks can desynchronize the circadian system, which in turn may lead to unwellness, chronic fatigue, decreased performance, obesity, neuropsychiatric disorders, and the development of different diseases...
...endogenous electrical balance in living organisms cannot occur in the presence of unnatural man-made electromagnetic pollution..... GSM mobile phone radiation is found to cause DNA damage on insect reproductive cells (gametes) and adversely affect reproduction for intensities down to 1 microwatt per centimetre squared after only a few minutes exposure..... (Ref (23))
1.
|
Professor
John R. Goldsmith
|
Possible
Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation
Environmental
Health Perspectives
Sup.
6 Dec. 1997 P. 1580
|
||
2.
|
Microwave
News
|
Children’s
Brains are Different
May
3rd. 2010 P.3
|
||
3.
|
Andrea
Klein & Barrie Trower
|
Wireless
Laptops and Their Transmitters Using Microwaves in Schools
P.3
(Undated)
|
||
4.
|
NMRI
|
AD750271
Research Report
MF12.
524.015-004B
4-10-1971
Bethesda,
Maryland, USA
|
||
5.
|
WHO
|
Biological
Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation
International
Symposium, Warsaw, Poland (1973)
With
US Dept of Health, Food and Drug Administration
Document
05-609-04
|
||
6.
|
Microwave
Mind Control
|
Mind
Control and the UK
Chapter
4. Tim Rifat
P.83
2001
|
||
7.
|
Hennies
Neitzke - Voight
|
Mobile
Telecommunications and Health Review of Current Scientific Research
T-Mobile
Hannnover
April
2007 Section 7
|
||
8.
|
US
Defence Intelligence Agency
|
DST
18105-076-76
March
1976
NB:
DST-18105-074-76 and ST-CS-01-169-72 also refer to this phenomena
|
||
9.
|
Barrie
Trower
|
Most
Confidential Report on the TETRA (Airwave) Communication System
Strictly
for the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS)
June
2009
|
||
10.
|
P.
Phillips, L.Brown, B. Thornton
|
US
Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights
Course
No. 11 Page 40
Sonoma
State University
As
a study of the History of US Intelligence Community Human Rights Violations
and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons
Project
Censored: Media Freedom Foundation
|
||
11.
|
J.
Simon C. Arthur
|
MAPK Aclivation by Radio Waves
MRC
Protein Phosphoryiation Unit
School
of Life Sciences
University
of Dundee
DD4
5EH UK
Published
by Journal of Biochemistry (405) e5 e6 2007
|
||
12.
|
Barrie
Trower
|
www.magdahavas.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Barrie
Trower SA.pdf
|
||
13.
|
Electromagnetic
Fields from Mobile Phones: Health Effects on Children and Teenagers
Russian
National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection
April
2011
|
|||
14.
|
Private
letters
(available
on internet) as titled and dated in text
|
|||
15.
|
C.
Avendano, A. Mata, C.A Sanchez Sarmienta, G. Doncel
|
Use
of Laptop Computers Connected to Internet Through Wi-fi Decreases Human Sperm
Motility and Increases Sperm Fragmentation
Nascentis
Medicina Reproductiva, Cordoba, Argentina
Dept
of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk,
Virginia (2012)
|
||
16.
|
Barrie
Trower
|
The
Communications Industry is in the Position Where it is Sprialling out of any
Person’s Ability to Control it
An
Open Letter (undated)
|
||
17.
|
Dr.
Andrew Goldsworthy
|
The
Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields Problems and Solutions
March
2012 P.14
|
||
18.
|
Stuart
Gallimore, Director of Children’s Services
|
Personal
Letter. Nick Gibb MP
House
of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA
30
August 2011
|
||
19.
|
Paul
James
|
Physicist:
I’m Stopped From Seeing my MP
Mid
Devon Advertiser
3.5.13
P. 13
|
||
20.
|
Personal
Conversations
I
am with holding their private telephone numbers for privacy
|
|||
21.
|
Nature
Publications Nature or Scientific American
75,
Varick Street, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10013-1917, USA
|
|||
22.
|
Dimitris
J. Panagopoulos,
Olle
Johansson &
George
L. Carlo
|
Evaluation
of Specific Absorption Rate as a Domestic Quantity for Electromagnetic Fields
Bioeffects
4.6.2013
Pages i) 1 ii) 2 iii) 4 iv) 6
PLOS
ONE June 2013 Vol 8 Issue 6 e62663
|
||
23.
|
Dimitris
J. Panagopoulos
University
of Athens
http://rense.com/general96/trower.html
|
Electromagnetic
Interaction Between Environmental Fields and Living Systems Determines Health
and Well-Being
Electromagnetic
Fields: Principles Biophysical Effects
ISBN
978-1-62417-063-8
Editors
M.H Kwang and S.O Yoon
2013
Nova Sciences Publishers, Inc
Pages
i) 20 ii) 35
| ||
