By Barrie Trower
August 24, 2013
ED Noor: Here are a few quotes from previous postings on this extremely important health issue. People hate it when I tell them why I refuse to own a cell phone! Sadly they cannot disagree with a word I say. There are too many reasons to list not the least of which is the breakdown of communication between people but in this case we learn of the health risks that have resulted in some countries having WiFi pulled out of the classroom altogether.
Communications antennas now blast the human habitat with many different electromagnetic frequencies simultaneously. Human DNA hears this energetic cacophony loud and clear, reacting like the human ear would to high volume country music, R&B plus rock and roll screaming from the same speaker. Irradiated cells struggle to protect themselves against this destructive dissonance by hardening their membranes. They cease to receive nourishment, stop releasing toxins, die prematurely and spill micronuclei fragments into a sort of "tumour bank account."This is precisely how microwave radiation prematurely ages living tissues.
All life pulsates in time to the earth and our artificial fields cause abnormal reactions in all organisms.
A nation that requires compulsory mass irradiation to fuel its trivial entertainment needs is surely destined to have a sickly and short-lived population.
are more important ~ idlers beaming death rays
for piddling gibberish
or the elderly with pacemakers
who are made ill
by cell phone and tower radiation
wherever they go.
THE RADIATION POISONING OF AMERICA ~ PT 1
CELL PHONES ARE DANGEROUS BUT THIS MAY BE WORSE
“Of the microwave-exposed women, 47.7% had miscarriages prior to week 7 of pregnancy.” (1)
Children’s absorption of microwave radiation can be ten times higher than adults.Permanent low-level microwave exposure can induce chronic nitrosative and oxidative ‘stress’ thence, damage the cellular mitochondria (mitochondropathy). This ‘stress’ can cause irreversible mitochondrial DNA damage (mitochondrial DNA is ten times more susceptible to oxidative and nitrosative ‘stress’ than the DNA in the cell nucleus).
Mitochondrial DNA is irreparable due to its low histone protein content; therefore any damage (genetic or otherwise) can be transmitted to all successive generations through the maternal line. (3)
I invite the Reader to peruse my diagram and / or read my simple explanation concerning the microwaving of the ovarian follicles in schoolgirls.
Imagine you are five years old, in school and sitting with a Wi-Fi laptop near your abdomen. Theoretically, your ovaries can become irradiated until you leave school at aged 16-18 years old. When you become pregnant, every one of your follicles (to become eggs) will have been microwaved. Hence, you may or may not deliver a healthy child.
Should you become a pregnant as a student, your embryo (for its first 100 days if it is female) is producing approximately 400,000 follicles (within its ovaries) for future child-birth.
The problem is that these developing follicle cells do not have the cellular protection of mature adult cells. Consequently your ‘Grandchild’ may have had every single follicle cell irradiated and damaged prior to its conception. Therefore when your child becomes an adult (with its irradiated follicles) there is a greater likelihood of its child (your Grand-daughter) suffering the ailments previously mentioned, during conception / embryonic and foetal development stages.
BEYOND BELIEF
The shocking truth is, not only was all of this known and documented long before Wi-Fi was ever put in front of children, but the dangerous biological effects were concealed (as they are to this day) from the general public, in order to protect the industries’ profit.
Professor Goldsmith writes:
“.....effects from exposure to RF radiation in certain populations: reproductive effects.....increased spontaneous abortion.....increased incidence of childhood and other cancers.....” (1)Confirming this with more than 2000 references is the Naval Medical Research Institute in their document: ‘Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (Effects) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation’ highlight ‘......Altered Menstrual Activity / Altered Foetal Development.....’ (4)
The World Health Organization’s ‘International Symposium’ Research Agreement No. 05-609-04 ‘Biological Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation’ emphasizes in its 350 pages: Biological effects, health and excess mortality from artificial irradiation of Radio Frequency Microwaves. Section 28 deals with problems concerning Reproductive Function.
This document was classed as ‘Top Secret’ and its contents withheld by WHO and ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection). (5)
Eldon Byrd, a scientist for the Naval Surface Weapon Centre of the US Navy, in one of his 1986 lectures on the effects of low-level microwaves, is referenced as stating:
‘.....we can alter the behaviour of cells, tissue.....cause up to six times higher foetus mortality and birth defects....’. (6)Finally, the Mobile Telecommunications Industry carried out a very thorough and exhaustive scientific study on its own product. This industries conclusion was:Sec. 7
“.....it can be concluded that electro-magnetic fields with frequencies in the mobile telecommunications range do play a role in the development of cancer
“.....Direct damage on the DNA as well as influences on the DNA synthesis and DNA repair mechanisms.....” (7)
It read:
“.....if the more advanced nations of the West are strict in the enforcement of stringent exposure standards, there could be unfavourable effects on industrial output.....exposed to microwave radiation below thermal levels experience more.....” (8)NB: Industrial output is of course...profit. A very relaxed exposure standard also makes it very difficult to take the industry to court.

*Wi-fi is of course, below thermal low-level microwave irradiation.*In order to appease the US Government, some Governments adopted the ICNIRP guideline, whereby, the only safety limit is just six-minutes of warming. Which means: if you do not feel too warm in six minutes, Wi-Fi is deemed to be safe.
No consideration at all has been given to the published ‘below thermal’ cellular interaction as listed by several countries including the United States; which were (and are) known to cause: cancer, severe neuro-pathological symptoms, foetal defects and literally hundreds of illnesses related to cellular disorders.
.
Should the Reader be wondering whether I am ‘as mad as a box of frogs’ and thinking ‘no government would ever harm its citizens for money, especially pregnant women’; I invite the Reader to investigate Government decisions behind: smoking, asbestos, BSE (mad-cow disease), lead in petrol, experiments on 20,000 UK serving military personnel serving in the 1960’s, thalidomide and of course Agent Orange sprayed over the food crops in Vietnam. To this day, many global birth defects stem from these Government / Government Scientific / Military decisions: with industrial advisors.
If further evidence is required, I invite the Reader to read documents released under the Freedom of Information Act; namely, Operations: Pandora, MK Ultra, MK Chaos, Cointelpro, MK Delta, MK Naomi, MK Search, Bluebird, Artichoke, Chatter, Sleeping Beauty and Grill Flame.
Here, secret experiments carried out by the Military / Government scientists upon unsuspecting civilians, namely: students, servicemen, psychiatric patients, poor, children over the age of 4 years, pregnant women, Muslims, Catholics, prisoners, handicapped, deaf, blind, homosexuals, single women, elderly, school children, ‘marginal groups’ and dissidents; served to increase their knowledge and understanding of; what is commonly known as...Stealth Warfare.
Progress Reports are also fed back to Governmental Scientists:
“.....students will understand the nature of RF...bioeffects research, including human / animal studies.....students will become familiar with current state of knowledge on potential health effects RF, such as cancer, memory loss, and birth defects.” (10)
.

STUDENT SCIENCE EXPERIMENT FINDS PLANTS WON'T GROW NEAR WI-FI ROUTER
INTENTIONAL IGNORANCE
A brilliant paper published by Dundee University confirms that low-level microwave irradiation, unable to cause any heating (thermal) effect, can affect cellular signalling processes. (11)
Blood Brain Barrier requires 18 months to form and protects the brain from toxins. It is known to be effected.
Myelin Sheath requires 22 years to build its 122 layers. It is responsible for all thinking, organ and muscle processes.
Brain requires 20 years to develop (I can assure you, cell phones do not help in its development).
Immune System requires 18 years to develop. Bone marrow and Bone Density are known to be affected by low-level microwaves as are the immune systems’ white blood cells.
Bones requires 28 years to develop as mentioned the moisture content of children makes both the ‘soft bones’ and marrow particularly attractive to microwave irradiation. Bone marrow produces blood cells.
I have been very honoured to address approximately 40 Royals, Governments, Leaders of Governments, Leaders of Peoples and Government Officials over the years.
The Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: in their research document ‘Health Effect on Children and Teenagers’ found:NB. The Reader may think that the cell phone irradiation is different from Wi-Fi as it has more power. In fact Wi-Fi can be more harmful because of its lower power! Low power can enter the body and cause harm. All electromagnetic waves are accumulative. If they are below the body’s threshold to cause activation of the necessary proteins required to defend and repair tissues, the damage accumulates very slowly and is undetectable like a cancer. Think of sunbathing on a cloudy day, you can still burn your skin.
85% increase in Central Nervous System Disorders
36% increase in epilepsy
11% increase in mental retardation
82% increase in blood immune disorders and Risk to Foetus. (13)
THE GOOD GUYS
‘.....ban all mobile phones, DECTphones or Wi-Fi or WLAN systems from classrooms and schools.....’
‘.....recommend the use of wired networks and not networks using the wireless broadband access systems, including Wi-Fi, in schools and educational establishments.’
‘.....do not add to the burden of public health by installing blanket wireless internet connections in Los Angeles Schools.’
‘.....this is an unprecedented exposure with unknown outcome on the health and reproductive potential of a generation.’ (14)
As an aside, should the Reader be wondering why I have not mentioned school-boys and whether they can be affected in a similar way to girls: the answer is ‘yes’.
In his most explanatorily descriptive paper, Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy writes.....
‘.....For example, Grigoriev et. Al. (2010) showed that 30 days exposure to unmodulated 2450 MHz microwave radiation triggered a small but significant increase in anti-brain antibodies in the blood of rats.....which could then result in an auto immune attack on the brain and / or nervous system. An example of an auto immune disease of the brain is Graves disease in which the pituitary gland (at the base of the brain) is affected.’ (17)
“.....advice given.....by UK Health Protection Agency..... ‘There is no consistent evidence of health effects from RF exposures below guideline levels and no reason why schools and others should not use Wi-fi equipment.” (18)
If I were to carry out an experiment on every single person who went through the doors of your main airport on any busy day and told them that they must drink one pint of beer and smoke ten cigarettes a day forever; some would react immediately, especially children. Others would react over days, weeks, months and years (many years in some cases). Then there would be those who would thoroughly enjoy the experiment and probably never be ill. That does not mean that alcohol and cigarettes are safe. It shows that people are not homogenous (all alike / identical). In other words, the conclusion of my experiment would be that there is: ‘no consistent evidence’.
WHAT THEY NEVER SAY IS:
WI-FI IS SAFE.
Clearly in England, some universities and some parliamentary persons are more afraid of governmental ‘reprisals’ than telling the truth. Regardless of the consequences.
1. “.....my daughter had just died. I am holding her hand. She has just had her 11 birthday and she was number 11 to die since the transmitter for Wi-fi was put near her and others’ desk.....”
2. “.....my child is one of several with cancer / birth genetic problems. These only started after the transmitter was turned on. My worries are two-fold and take every second of my life. Will my child ever marry or find a partner and be happy? What will happen when I die? I know I will die worrying. Regardless of who is to blame, it is me, the Mother who carries guilt and responsibility.....” (20)
In just two generations we could have more dead / sick infants than resulted from both World Wars. And, these are not my figures; they come from Government advisors / research.
INTERNATIONAL CHALLENGEI have two requests:Would a Royal or Leading Governmental Official please ask the British Prime Minister, face to face, why he told my MP, Mr Stride, that he is ‘too busy’ to see me for just one hour to discuss this issue.If every Reader sends just two copies of this Paper to people who may be able make a decision (preferably influential women); with mathematical progression ~ the original 100 advanced requests will soon land on a desk of somebody who can make a difference.
“What is the safe level of microwave irradiation for the ovarian follicles during the first 100 days development of the embryo?”To date, not a single scientist will appear and face me.
Thank you.
Barrie Trower
3 Flowers Meadow
Liverton
Devon TQ12 6UP
United Kingdom
In UK - 01626 821014
World 00 44 1626 821014
September 1 2013
(This Paper is copyright free)
Epilogue
Professors’ / Doctors’ Panagopoulos, Johnasson and Carlo describe in their (June 2013 Published) Paper~ how man-made electromagnetic waves (as used in the communications industry) can cause interference, hence induced oscillations, from these polarized waves.
This in turn, can induce biological alterations and render the SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) obsolete.
They write:
~ Man-made electromagnetic waves...they are polarized...~ .... can produce interference effect...This induced oscillation will be most intense on the free particles which carry a net electric charge...a part of its energy...is transferred to the charged / polar molecules of the medium...within biological tissue there will be additional energy absorption by the water dipoles...proteins, lipids or nucleic acids, which will also be forced to oscillate by the applied field.~ .... man-made EMF’s can produce severe biological alterations such as DNA damage without heating the biological tissue...may lead to cancer, neurodegenerative deceases, reproductive declines or even heritable mutations...conductivity varies for different tissues and different field frequencies..The relative permittivity of an adult brain is calculated to be around 40 while the corresponding value for a young child’s brain is between 60 and 80 resulting in almost double the radiation absorption and SAR...~ ... SAR offers no information at all with respect to frequency, waveform or modulation... (Ref (22))
~ Disturbances in the communication between individual body clocks can desynchronize the circadian system, which in turn may lead to unwellness, chronic fatigue, decreased performance, obesity, neuropsychiatric disorders, and the development of different diseases...
...endogenous electrical balance in living organisms cannot occur in the presence of unnatural man-made electromagnetic pollution..... GSM mobile phone radiation is found to cause DNA damage on insect reproductive cells (gametes) and adversely affect reproduction for intensities down to 1 microwatt per centimetre squared after only a few minutes exposure..... (Ref (23))
1.
|
Professor
John R. Goldsmith
|
Possible
Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation
Environmental
Health Perspectives
Sup.
6 Dec. 1997 P. 1580
|
||
2.
|
Microwave
News
|
Children’s
Brains are Different
May
3rd. 2010 P.3
|
||
3.
|
Andrea
Klein & Barrie Trower
|
Wireless
Laptops and Their Transmitters Using Microwaves in Schools
P.3
(Undated)
|
||
4.
|
NMRI
|
AD750271
Research Report
MF12.
524.015-004B
4-10-1971
Bethesda,
Maryland, USA
|
||
5.
|
WHO
|
Biological
Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation
International
Symposium, Warsaw, Poland (1973)
With
US Dept of Health, Food and Drug Administration
Document
05-609-04
|
||
6.
|
Microwave
Mind Control
|
Mind
Control and the UK
Chapter
4. Tim Rifat
P.83
2001
|
||
7.
|
Hennies
Neitzke - Voight
|
Mobile
Telecommunications and Health Review of Current Scientific Research
T-Mobile
Hannnover
April
2007 Section 7
|
||
8.
|
US
Defence Intelligence Agency
|
DST
18105-076-76
March
1976
NB:
DST-18105-074-76 and ST-CS-01-169-72 also refer to this phenomena
|
||
9.
|
Barrie
Trower
|
Most
Confidential Report on the TETRA (Airwave) Communication System
Strictly
for the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS)
June
2009
|
||
10.
|
P.
Phillips, L.Brown, B. Thornton
|
US
Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights
Course
No. 11 Page 40
Sonoma
State University
As
a study of the History of US Intelligence Community Human Rights Violations
and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons
Project
Censored: Media Freedom Foundation
|
||
11.
|
J.
Simon C. Arthur
|
MAPK Aclivation by Radio Waves
MRC
Protein Phosphoryiation Unit
School
of Life Sciences
University
of Dundee
DD4
5EH UK
Published
by Journal of Biochemistry (405) e5 e6 2007
|
||
12.
|
Barrie
Trower
|
www.magdahavas.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Barrie
Trower SA.pdf
|
||
13.
|
Electromagnetic
Fields from Mobile Phones: Health Effects on Children and Teenagers
Russian
National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection
April
2011
|
|||
14.
|
Private
letters
(available
on internet) as titled and dated in text
|
|||
15.
|
C.
Avendano, A. Mata, C.A Sanchez Sarmienta, G. Doncel
|
Use
of Laptop Computers Connected to Internet Through Wi-fi Decreases Human Sperm
Motility and Increases Sperm Fragmentation
Nascentis
Medicina Reproductiva, Cordoba, Argentina
Dept
of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk,
Virginia (2012)
|
||
16.
|
Barrie
Trower
|
The
Communications Industry is in the Position Where it is Sprialling out of any
Person’s Ability to Control it
An
Open Letter (undated)
|
||
17.
|
Dr.
Andrew Goldsworthy
|
The
Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields Problems and Solutions
March
2012 P.14
|
||
18.
|
Stuart
Gallimore, Director of Children’s Services
|
Personal
Letter. Nick Gibb MP
House
of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA
30
August 2011
|
||
19.
|
Paul
James
|
Physicist:
I’m Stopped From Seeing my MP
Mid
Devon Advertiser
3.5.13
P. 13
|
||
20.
|
Personal
Conversations
I
am with holding their private telephone numbers for privacy
|
|||
21.
|
Nature
Publications Nature or Scientific American
75,
Varick Street, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10013-1917, USA
|
|||
22.
|
Dimitris
J. Panagopoulos,
Olle
Johansson &
George
L. Carlo
|
Evaluation
of Specific Absorption Rate as a Domestic Quantity for Electromagnetic Fields
Bioeffects
4.6.2013
Pages i) 1 ii) 2 iii) 4 iv) 6
PLOS
ONE June 2013 Vol 8 Issue 6 e62663
|
||
23.
|
Dimitris
J. Panagopoulos
University
of Athens
http://rense.com/general96/trower.html
|
Electromagnetic
Interaction Between Environmental Fields and Living Systems Determines Health
and Well-Being
Electromagnetic
Fields: Principles Biophysical Effects
ISBN
978-1-62417-063-8
Editors
M.H Kwang and S.O Yoon
2013
Nova Sciences Publishers, Inc
Pages
i) 20 ii) 35
| ||