Who are these guys and how did they end up in
Israel anyhow? Thisparticular group is offended by the presence of a female news reporter.
ED Noor: They sneeringly refer to themselves as
“the Tribe” but accuse all non Jews of anti semitism should they dare to do
so. In the past I have done work on the Khazars but today I present a
review of Chapter Eight, THE KHAZARIAN CONNECTION, THE SEARCH FOR ASHKENAZI
ORIGINS, from Harrell Rhome’s 2011 book, From The Temple To The Talmud,
Exploring Judaic Origins, History, Folklore and Tribal Traditions.
What I have done is added videos, images, notes,
links, and just enhanced the original piece.
An excellent opener is to listen to the esteemed
educator Sheik Imran Hosein speak on the Khazars.
These Khazars will be pushing humanity towards
destruction at an even faster and more frenetic pace in the coming year; all
indications otherwise are not encouraging.
Every once in awhile it is a good idea to study
anew the mindset of those who wish to eliminate us from the planet, or enslave
us. Getting another insight into their origins always helps. Especially when
you can see how those ancient and hidden techniques are now being applied today
using modern methodologies as well as the ancient ones, driven by the ancient
systems that have basically remained unchained over the millenia whilst
wreaking havoc on all others.
Arthur Koestler’s review of the above is an
enlightening, educational reminder of just what we are dealing with ~ the
Tribe, and yes, they are all members and they all know, on some level, just
what is what.
For those of you still learning about the Jewish
people, this is an excellent start. For many it is a reminder.... and for
others just plain history that they would rather the rest of us never learn
about. Chinese Jews? Japanese Jews? Yemini and Ethiopian Jews?
And then there is the simple question that begs
to be asked:
Should the proper and politically (in)correct
name for the upstart state Israel actually be "New Khazaria"?
Lastly I apologize for it taking so long to get
this out but…. There was bad code in the original work and it has taken me
seven attempts to post … each attempt taking at least an hour to load images
etc. Hopefully if I divide this in two it might work.
THE CURIOUSLY CAMOUFLAGED
AND CONVENIENTLY CONVOLUTED CHRONICLE
OF THE PEOPLE CALLED JEWS.
By Arthur Koestler
The Jews of our times fall into two main
divisions: Sephardim and Ashkenazim.
The Sephardim are descendants of the Jews who
since antiquity had lived in Spain (in Hebrew Sepharad) until they were
expelled at the end of the fifteenth century and settled in the countries
bordering the Mediterranean, the Balkans, and to a lesser extent in Western
Europe. They spoke a Spanish-Hebrew dialect, Ladino, and preserved their own
traditions and religious rites. In the 1960s, the number of Sephardim was
estimated at 500,000.
The Ashkenazim, at the same period, numbered
about eleven million. Thus, in common parlance, Jew is practically synonymous
with Ashkenazi Jew." (Page 181).
In Mr. Koestler's own words,
"The story of the Khazar Empire, as it
slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the cruelest hoax which
history has ever perpetrated."
The history of the Ashkenazi Jews was widely
known and appreciated in the former Soviet Union. Ashkenazi militants traced
the area where the Turkic Khazars originated before their migration to Southern
Russia to Birobidjan, an Eastern Siberian area as big as Switzerland bordered
by the Amur River, by China and Mongolia. Around 1928 they started building
settlements with the Soviet government's help and in 1934 the Autonomous
Republic (Okrug) of Birobidjan Yevrei came into being with official languages
of Yiddish and Russian. It is still there as an Autonomous Republic to this
day, offering the only historically legitimate settlement area for Ashkenazi
Jews willing to exercise their "right to return".
Make the primary Khazarian connection.
A significantly large number of the folk
called Jews are not Semitic in origin, and their ancestors never set foot in
old Palestine.
For over a millennium, an originally Asiatic
tribe has had considerable, some say undue, influence on the course of world
affairs, perhaps more than any other ethnic group. Who are they? Few, if any
other cultures have impacted the world through the ages like this people. Their
real name almost faded away along with their once mighty empire of Khazaria.
In contrast, the people called Khazars did not
disappear at all.
.
They underwent a convenient identity change,
creating a unique designation for themselves.
They became the “Jews of Eastern Europe”, the
so-called and self-styled Ashkenazim, adopting and adapting a Semitic Hebrew
heritage that was never really theirs. It was under this new name that they
entered Europe.
“Jews are the most intelligent people in the
world, so if it benefits them to change their names, they do so. That’s all
there is to it. They mix in your society which is plenty corrupt....” ~ Harold
Rosenthal Interview.
FOLLOWING THE TRAIL CAN BE DIFFICULT.
Quite naturally, one of the first questions
some readers ask is why there are so few books on Khazarian culture and
history?
In addition to being ignored and somewhat
suppressed, there are reasons of a more scholarly nature. Douglas M. Dunlop,
whose study preceded Arthur Koestler’s, was one of the first modern scholars to
directly address this little-known saga.
ED Noor: I suggest another reason for the
clandestine nature of this group being so well kept from the eyes of the world
is ownership of media and the historical revisionism by those who rewrote or
recorded it as the case may be. In most cases, the reviled historical
revisionists of today are doing no more than correcting what was already
corrupted.
“A continuous account of the Khazars was in
fact given by the Cambridge historian J. B. Bury, in a chapter of his History
of the Eastern Roman Empire [London, 1912]. This may be taken as the best
account available, though there are others, besides a great number of
monographs on various aspects of the subject and incidental references in
modern books.
“The chief reason why we are not more familiar
with the Khazars appears to be neither the lack of intrinsic interest presented
by their story nor the absence of material, but rather the difficulty of
dealing with the existing sources ~ partly because they are written in a
variety of languages, Greek, Arabic, Hebrew, Syriac, Armenian, Georgian,
Russian, Persian, Turkish, and even Chinese, with which no one can be expected
to be conversant at first hand; and partly because of the contradiction and
obscurity of the data thus afforded.” ~ Dunlop, History of the Jewish Khazars,
p. x.
THE GENESIS OF A STRATEGIC TERM
This term is our second Khazarian connection.
A few points must be made about the word, Jew.
It was originally spelled and pronounced very differently than today. The
meaning was Judean, i.e., someone from Judea, a small subsection of ancient
Palestine. In its beginning, this meant nothing necessarily religious. It was a
simple geographical designation, but things have changed.
The modern word Jew is a “secondary usage”,
and did not take on its current meaning or pronunciation until the 1700s.
Through this adaptation and misusage, the
Khazars took on the special mantle and alleged heritage (in truth, mostly
mythological anyway) of an ancient coalition of Semitic tribes, sometimes
called Habiru Sagaz (“raiders from across the river”), Hebrews or Israelites.
Israel means “chosen of El” (one of several
deities mentioned in Genesis), though some say its roots come from Egypt,
denoting Isis, Ra and El, the same place they borrowed and adapted their
Yahu/Yahweh ethnocentric deity. Whatever the case may be, Israelite, like
Judean, was used at one time or another by several tribes who migrated around
the area.
But wherever the alleged bloodline rights to
any purportedly “promised lands” may lead, they never lead to non-Semitic
Khazaria.
Khazars are neither the “Chosen Ones” nor the
“Children of Israel” except in their own fantasies and desires!
The real roots of the ancient Semitic Middle
Eastern tribes are quite hard to follow. In practical and provable
historical terms, there are no pure and distinct bloodlines back to Old
Testament times.
How can we follow bloodlines when we hardly
know who some of those ancient folk really were? One need not explore too far
into ancient history to realize how very little we actually know.
“Historical sequences are convoluted at best.
The players are manifold and the events themselves become lost in the obscurity
of antiquity.” ~ The Phoenix Journals.
JESUS AND THE JEWS OF HIS TIME, PARALLELS WITH
TODAY?
For those who follow New Testament teachings,
here is what Jesus said to the Talmudic cult of Pharisees over twenty centuries
ago. There is a theme here, one of lies and deception. Modern
“Judeo-Christians” (what an ultra misnomer!) seem obsessed with prophecies of
one kind or another, but can they connect what is below with current
events?
.
Sadly, few seem willing or able to do so,
choosing to believe “Jesus was a Jew” and that today’s Judaic Zionists are the
“chosen people”.
No, that is not what your Bible says. There’s
more if you want to find it, but these verses should really be enough. Make
the connection.
“Ye are of your father the devil, and the
lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and
abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a
lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. And
because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.” John 8:44-45.
“I know… the blasphemy of them which say they
are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan … which say they are
Jews, and are not, but do lie…. Revelation 2:9-10, 3:9.
Who is spoken of?
Who fits this profile today?
Is Jesus talking about the Khazar convert Jews
who entered Europe a thousand years after he spoke?
.
If so, we could say this young Palestinian
prophet, leading a resistance movement against the Pharisaic cult and
conspiracy that ultimately killed him, provided a prescient look ahead.
While the Khazars are surely not the people of
the New Testament, having merely appropriated this supposed heritage and
mythos, they certainly match the Talmudists of old Palestine in cunning and
guile. For hundreds of years, the Khazar Judaics have excelled in the teachings
of the Talmud.
Unfortunately, their Talmudic schemes and
machinations have largely succeeded.
For example,
a lot of modern Christianity
is little more
than Judaism for the goyim.
ED Noor: Please read my recent posts on the Scofield Bible and Christian Zionism for information on this and how they managed to take over American Christianity..
They say it best themselves.
“Judaism is not only the teaching of the
synagogue, but also the doctrine of every ‘Christian Church’ in America.
Through our propaganda the Church has become our most avid supporter. This has
even given us a special place in society, their believing the lie that we are
the ‘Chosen People’ and they, ‘Gentiles’.” ~ Harold Rosenthal Interview.
MAKING KHAZARIAN CONNECTIONS IN OUR WORLD
TODAY.
“History is always written generations after
the event, when clouded fact and memory have all fused into what can be
accepted as truth, whether it be so or not.” ~ Theodore White.
The authentic history of this obscure tribal
group is imperative. Not only is the USA, indeed almost every western
government, committed financially and militarily to defend the unjustly
established State of Israel, as we painfully see, almost every Christian church
in America promotes this Khazar Zionist nightmare regime.
The present-day reality of the Israeli
ministate and its myriad of problems take on an entirely different meaning when
seen in proper context, but first, we must lift the veil of obfuscation.
When the Khazarian connection is made, it
truly begs the question.
Why do the American people support patently
false land claims from a racial/tribal lineage that was never remotely from
Palestine or anywhere else in the Mideast?
This is crucial in reviewing what are
otherwise just little known facts about an obscure ancient Central Asian tribe.
As a result of media suppression and a
dumbed-down educational system even at the university level, few Americans make
the Khazarian connection.
American Muslims know the truth through their own
news services such as Radio Islam, but most other Americans, especially
Christians, seem either to know nothing or don’t care to know anything as it
contradicts their religious beliefs.
Not only that,
many Jews
know or understand very little of this tale.
What force is powerful enough, not so much to
rewrite history, but to write around it, virtually erasing significant traces
or comments about the ferocious Khazar tribes, and their early impact on
western culture and world history?
“God cannot alter the past,
but historians can" ~ Samuel Butler.
At its height, Khazaria consisted of a
territory in West Central Asia and Eastern Europe encompassing over one million
square miles, located between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea (which was once
called the Chasarian Sea), and northwest to Kiev.
Why the historical blackout? Who are they?
What happened to them? This is the subject of our paper.
Two maps show the Khazar Empire at the height
of its power.
The Khazars were fierce and ferocious warriors.
Both a well armed and armored heavy cavalryman and foot soldier are shown
below.
The word, Hussar, for cavalryman, may have
come from Khazar since the Turkish word for Khazar is Hazar.
ED Noor: Note that even back then they wore the payot
or sidelocks that are still supposed to be worn by all Jews, not just the
orthodox. For acceptance and immersion into other cultures, many do not
grow them.
Khazar Jewish soldier today
AN OVERVIEW OF KHAZARIAN HISTORY.
Here are the facts as set forth, not only by
the historians and books of the past, but by those in modern times. The works
of Arthur Koestler, Benjamin Freedman, Douglas M. Dunlop, Kevin Brook, and more
than a few others speak to these matters.
We see below what some present day Khazar
descendants, called the Karay Turks, say about the origin of the name. They too
are Khazar convert Jews, but do not follow the Talmud. Not just that; the Karay
are very proud of their Turko-Asian heritage.
“Khazar is a Turkish word derived from the
root, ‘kaz’, with the meaning of ‘gez’ (wander). In Anatolian Turkish, the term
‘khazar’ means ‘gezer’ (wanderer), and coincides with the meaning of a nomad
who freely wanders around without any connection to one place.
Probably, this
word took its final shape through an etymological transformation in the forms
of ‘gezer’, ‘gazar’, ‘kazar’ and ‘hazar’. The word is ‘el-Hazar’ in Arabic,
‘Huzari’, ‘Kozar’ in Hebrew, ‘Gazari’, ‘Chazari’ in Latin, ‘Hazari’ in
Georgian, ‘Huszar’ in Hungarian and ‘Ko-sa’, ‘ka-sat’ in Chinese.”
The Khazars, a migratory folk originating in
eastern Asia and close kinsmen of the Huns and Mongols, trekked westward. In
c.138, the Khazar tribe’s folk arrived in the area between the Caspian and the
Black Seas, near several great rivers. There they established a tribal kingdom
that grew in power and influence.
For well over four hundred years they ruled
over an immense and lucrative empire south of the Russian territories, between
the Black Sea and the Chasarian/Caspian Sea, reaching as far northwest as Kiev.
In its day, the Khaghanate (kingdom, empire,
khanate) was larger and richer than any other country in Europe. Yes, Khazaria
(Khazaran; Khuzaran; Arabic al-Kazara, Kusari; Hebrew Kuzarim), like later
Russia, was both an Asian and a European nation. Their location was of key
geopolitical importance. Europe was on the west, the Rus Verangians,
descendents of the Vikings, on the north, all of Asia and the Silk Road to the
east (but, from whence came the Mongols, their later downfall), plus Greek
Christian Byzantium and the newly ascendant Islamic Arabs to the south.
Khazaria was a powerful regional military and
trade power. They were commercial wizards of the first order, although those
who had to pay the tolls on their seas, rivers and overland trade routes might
rather have called them extortionists. Truth be known, the Khazars lived almost
solely off this revenue. They produced nothing for export except Isinglass.
Clothes, tools and virtually everything else came from outside the
country.
ED Noor: Isinglass is a substance obtained from
the dried swim bladders of fish.
It is a form of collagen used mainly for the clarification
of wine and beer.
It can also be cooked into a paste for specialized gluing purposes. Originally
made exclusively from sturgeon, especially Beluga sturgeon, until the 1795 invention by William Murdoch of a cheap substitute using cod.
This was extensively used in Britain in place of Russian isinglass. The bladders, once removed from the fish,
processed and dried, are formed into various shapes for use
Over time they created additional loot by
conquering, oppressing and extorting taxes from over twenty-five nearby
peaceful agricultural tribes. Khazaria produced very little. It was an
empire almost solely supported by trade-related revenues. Of course, this
mercantile mindset came with them into Europe, but it began a long time before
that.
TRADERS AND MERCHANTS OF A HIGH ORDER.
Khazars were heavily involved in all kinds of
international barter, including the slave trade ~ hence, the sex trade too,
just as they are today. They were one of the better-known procurers and
suppliers of Slavs, a people so exploited in this fashion that their very name
came to mean slave. The Rus routinely sold Slav captives to the Khazars. This
continued in their later migrations and machinations.
In the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries,
Khazar descendents, along with Sephardic co-religionists, are the dominant
players in shipping the black slaves from Africa to the Americas. In his History of the
Jews, Solomon Grayzel clearly lays this out.
“One type of business carried on in the early
Middle Ages by the Jews of Europe, namely the slave trade, requires a special
word of explanation. The Jews were among the most important slave-dealers.
As inhabitants of western Germany pushed their
way deeper and deeper into Central Europe, driving the Slavic inhabitants
farther eastward and taking away their land, they brought back captives whom
they sold to Jewish traders. The Jews, in turn, transported these slaves to
other lands to be sold to Christian and Mohammedan masters.”
Another trade learned as Khazars and continued
as Jews was that of the furrier. Marten, Sable and other fine furs (in addition
to many other valuable products) came down the Volga via the Bulgars, and goods
flowed all the way from Novgorod via the Dnieper, not to mention other centers
via the Don and several more major waterways. Some main commodities were furs,
hides, honey, flax, tar, cloth, grains, gold, silver, jewels and silks.
The Khazars made almost no cloth or clothes,
getting them all through the mercantile networks. Old descriptions of Khazar
clothing sound something like the Hasidim and others, featuring fur hats and
long coats. Trade in many of these items continued to be dominated by the
Khazars even after they migrated into Europe. For example, the fur business is
often a Judaic enterprise even today.
How many species of fur bearing creatures are extinct or facing extinction so these men can wear these extremely expensive antiquated hats?
Of course, the dominant international diamond
and jewel traders (thus they are involved with “blood diamonds”) are the Khazar
Ashkenazi Hasidic Jews. While dominant in more than a few industries today,
back in Khazaria and later in Europe, they were the chief players, sometimes
the only players, in commercial enterprises such as brewing, and, of course,
later in distilling. The early pioneers in manufacturing and marketing of
alcoholic beverages were often Khazar Jews.
“In the ‘dark age,’ the commerce of Western
Europe was largely in Jewish hands, not excluding the slave trade, and in the
Carolingian cartularies Jew and Merchant are used as almost interchangeable
terms.” Dr. Cecil Roth, World History of the Jewish People.
Minister Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of
Islam were lambasted and criticized by the Zionist dominated media for daring
to publish, with heavy documentation, the history of Jews and the African slave
trade. The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews (by an anonymous writer
or group of writers) is quite well researched and very difficult to refute.
ED Noor: When I visited Jewtown in Kochi, Kerala,
India, several years ago I found it deserted. and was told that the traders had
left once Israel was founded but had lived there, in the heart; of Indian spice
growing land for a thousand years. I was also informed that many Jews had moved
up into the Western Mountains were they took over the lucrative spice,
sandalwood and tea plantations.
Bene Israel Family at Bombay, circa 1900. Jewish Encyclopedia,
1901-1906

Cochin (Kochi) Jews, circa 1900. Jewish
Encyclopedia, 1901-1906
Ezra Joseph Gubbay
.
The Sephardic Jews were among the earliest sea
traders, sailors, shippers and ship owners, as were their Semitic cousins, the
Phoenicians. With co-religionists in almost every port in the world, they got
the goods reliably delivered when international shipping was an extremely risky
business, and before the modern insurance industry began.
ED Noor: Please note that, per agenda of divide
and conquer utilized so effectively by today's Khazars Zionists,
little or no mention is ever made of the white slave trade, primarily Irish, to America!
Above, Irish sugar slaves were usually simply
worked to death as part of the Irish genocide.. Most information found on
slavery pertains to black slaves only, or, in m,ore modern incidences white sexual slavery.
heir involvement in the profitable human
cargo trade was a natural development of their extensive trade and shipping
connections. Both Sephardis and Ashkenazis were prominent in the slave trade.
Today, it is the lucrative and despicable sex slave trade that holds their interest.
Make the Khazarian connection.
Some of their main families, exemplified by
the Rothschilds as well as other Illuminati bloodlines, consisted of slavers,
war profiteers and exploiters, then as now.
White sex slaves
.
HOW THE KHAGHANATE WAS GOVERNED.
Before moving on, we say a few words about the
Khazar monarchy. Its ruler was the Khaghan, an emperor or high king (related to
Khan, also rendered as khakhan, khaqan, etc.). He was a ceremonial figure of
sorts, and a spiritual leader as well. Curiously, this old Khazar title may
still be with us in the Judaic name, Kagan. The Khaghan was head of state, but
not head of government.
Another important character was the Begh, a
Shogun-like grand vizier or generalissimo figure. This is a curious job. As
would a Prime Minister, along with a council of ministers, the Begh conducted
everyday business, yet was also the military commander-in-chief. But at other
times, he seems more like a co-monarch, sometimes styled as the Khaghan Begh.
Of course, this “begs” the question and makes the relationship even harder to
fathom. In Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan and other places, the old title is still used
for some tribal leaders. Koestler tells us more.
“All this does not explain the startling
division of divine and secular power, apparently unique in that period and
region. As Bury wrote: ‘We have no information at what time the active
authority of the Chagan was exchanged for his divine nullity, or why he was
exalted to a position resembling that of the Emperor of Japan, in which his
existence, and not his government, was considered essential to the prosperity
of the State.’ A speculative answer to this question has recently been proposed
by Artamonov.
“He suggests that the acceptance of Judaism
as the state religion was the result of a coup d'état, which at the same time
reduced the Kagan, descendant of a pagan dynasty whose allegiance to Mosaic Law
could not really be trusted, to a mere figurehead.
“This is a hypothesis as good as any other ~
and with as little evidence to support it. Yet it seems probable that the two
events ~ the adoption of Judaism and the establishment of the double kingship ~
were somehow connected. Before the conversion the Kagan was still reported to
play an active role ~ as, for instance, in his dealings with Justinian. To
complicate matters further, the Arab sources sometimes refer to the ‘Kagan’
when they clearly mean the ‘Bek’ (as ‘kagan’ was the generic term for ‘ruler’
among many tribes), and they also use different names for the Bek….”
In some ways, the supreme monarch’s role seems
ceremonial and minimal, but this is not consistent, and may have varied,
depending on the personality and goals of those who came to the throne. As we
shall see, some played the dominant role in diplomatic affairs. We also know
that the Khaghan made a required ceremonial appearance before the people every
four months, but the record is vague about other functions.
When he appeared before the people, did he
grant audiences? Did he make proclamations? Alas, we do not know.
We might assume he had some sort of veto power
if the Begh failed in his tasks. This curious relationship was not always consistent.
The Begh was the supreme military leader, but some Khaghans were known to take
the field at the head of their troops. Other than the curious “co-rulers”,
Khazaria was, more or less, a traditional monarchy. It also had a shamanistic
priesthood, a warrior caste (probably the Begh came from this class) and an
aristocracy (the “White Khazars” or Aq Khazars), but we know little more.
HISTORICAL SIDEBAR: DID THE ANCIENT KHAZARS
RITUALLY SLAY THEIR KING?
As the Khaghan was also a spiritual leader, some
strange rituals grew up around him and his role. Koestler tells the tale.
“There is no evidence of the Khazars engaging
in religious persecution, either before or after the conversion to Judaism. In
this respect they may be called more tolerant and enlightened than the East
Roman Empire or Islam in its early stages.
“On the other hand, they seem to have
preserved some barbaric rituals from their tribal past. We have heard Ibn
Fadlan on the killings of the royal gravediggers. He also has something to say
about another archaic custom regicide: ‘The period of the king's rule is forty
years. If he exceeds this time by a single day, his subjects and attendants
kill him, saying ‘His reasoning is already dimmed, and his insight confused’.
"...Istakhri has a different version of
it: When they wish to enthrone this Kagan, they put a silken cord round his
neck and tighten it until he begins to choke. Then they ask him: ‘How long
doest thou intend to rule?’ If he does not die before that year, he is killed
when he reaches it.”
“Bury is doubtful whether to believe this kind
of Arab traveler’s lore, and one would indeed be inclined to dismiss it, if
ritual regicide had not been such a widespread phenomenon among primitive (and
not-so-primitive) people. Frazer laid great emphasis on the connection between
the concept of the King's divinity, and the sacred obligation to kill him after
a fixed period, or when his vitality is on the wane, so that the divine power
may find a more youthful and vigorous incarnation.
Sir James Frazer wrote a special treatise on
these lines on "The Killing of the Khazar Kings" (Folklore, XXVIII,
1917). It speaks in Istakhri's favour that the bizarre ceremony of ‘choking’
the future King has been reported in existence apparently not so long ago among
another people, the Kok-Turks. Zeki Validi quotes a French anthropologist, St
Julien, writing in 1864.”
“When the new Chief has been elected, his
officers and attendants ... make him mount his horse. They tighten a ribbon of
silk round his neck, without quite strangling him; then they loosen the ribbon
and ask him with great insistence: "For how many years canst thou be our
Khan?" The king, in his troubled mind, being unable to name a figure, his
subjects decide, on the strength of the words that have escaped him, whether
his rule will be long or brief.”
“We do not know whether the Khazar rite of
slaying the King (if it ever existed) fell into abeyance when they adopted
Judaism, in which case the Arab writers were confusing past with present practices
as they did all the time, compiling earlier travelers’ reports, and attributing
them to contemporaries.
However that may be, the point to be retained,
and which seems beyond dispute, is the divine role attributed to the Kagan,
regardless whether or not it implied his ultimate sacrifice. We have heard
before that he was venerated, but virtually kept in seclusion, cut off from the
people, until he was buried with enormous ceremony. The affairs of state,
including leadership of the army, were managed by the Bek (sometimes also
called the Kagan Bek), who wielded all effective power.”
As previously observed, this is all a bit
frustrating due to its inconsistency. Some Khaghans not only led their troops,
but presided over sensitive diplomatic negotiations and treaties. The Khazar
king was also a spiritual leader, so we examine this dimension next.
THE KHAZARS AND RELIGION.
“The Chasars professed a coarse religion,
which was combined with sensuality and lewdness.” ~ Heinrich Graetz, History Of
The Jews, 1892.
Like kindred tribes, their old religion was
primitive shamanism sometimes even involving human sacrifice. But, change was
in the air. History records that in the middle of the Eighth Century (c.740),
the Khaghan, along with the Begh, their ministers and close advisors, made a
carefully calculated geopolitical decision about a state religion.
This had become a sticking point in foreign
affairs.
While fighting Muslims in crucial battles at
certain times, the Khazars also had many of the Islamic faith, not only within
their borders, but as mercenaries in their multicultural army. Bulan even have
made a half-hearted conversion from shamanism to Islam (c.737), making the
religious situation even more confusing. Apparently, if it happened at all, it
was largely symbolic, involving only the Khagan, who was said to have quarreled
with the Imams about their strict dietary rules.
“At first sight, the statements that the
Khaghan became a Muslim in A.D. 737 and Judaized three years later are, to say
the least, remarkable.” Dunlop, p. 86.
CHRISTIAN KHAZARS?
There was apparently an ongoing Christian
presence. Certainly they must have interacted with Christian merchants and
maybe missionaries and other travelers on their trade routes.
An Armenian bishop is said to have preached in
the area around 682. While he likely converted a few, there is no record of a
diocese being established or priests coming to start mission churches. However,
this was right in the middle of two Khazar-Arab wars, so the timing was not
ideal. As to how deep the Christian roots were planted is a wide-open question.
But, apparently, some did get baptized, and there are ongoing references to
Christian Khazars.
“The Khazars evidently had the qualities of a
Jack-in-the-Box, derived from their Turkish origin, or Mosaic faith, or both.
Cedrenus [the chronicler] also says the name of [a] defeated Khazar leader was
Georgius Tzul. Georgius is a Christian name; we know from an earlier report
that there were Christians as well as Muslims in the Khaghan’s army”. Koestler,
pp. 129-130.
Essentially, all of Europe owes an
unacknowledged debt to Khazaria. The Khazars repelled two massive Islamic
jihads from the powerful and aggressive Abbasid Caliphate. Without a doubt, in
due course, they would have continued into Europe.
If you have not realized it yet, Europe has
always been and still is the target of the global Islamic world jihad, bringing
about a whole planet in submission to Islam, Allah, the Koran and Shariah Law.
ED Noor: The above sentiment is from the
author and does show the more international and ancient aspects of the
Khazar/Jew struggle with the Arab and Christian peoples.
The first Khazar-Arab war lasted from 642
until 653; the second from 732 to 737. In both endeavors, they repelled the
Muslim invaders, and the Abbasid Caliphate turned its eyes elsewhere.
THE KHAZAR CONVERSION.
So as we see, the Judaic conversion came in a
time of war and upheaval as Khazaria was surely and certainly beset by the
Muslim armies.
Turning Christian was out of the question. Not
only would this have put them in a compromising position with both the Vatican
and Byzantium, but more importantly, would have insulted the Muslims. What were
they to do?
Bulan, the Begh and their ministers set out to
remedy the situation. While some writers say it never really happened, they
reportedly brought in Greek philosophers, Christian Bishops and evangelists,
Islamic Mullahs and Faqihs, and rabbis from Baghdad and Babylon for debates and
dissertations about their respective faiths.
Whatever the facts may be, the decision was
already made. Indeed, we must opine that Judaism did not just suddenly appear
right before the great debate.
According to several sources, a rabbi was
already resident at the Khaghan’s court. This may reflect an earlier date
(c.721), for the beginning of Judaic influence at the top levels of power. This
was through oriental Jews, from already existing communities like those in
Persia, Baghdad and Byzantium.
While the decision to convert was made behind
the scenes, for the sake of appearances, the other religions were brought in
for the famous theological dispute.
So, after an appropriate deliberation period,
the Khaghan, and thus his nation, converted to Judaic Talmudism. Rabbis were
imported for the appropriate rites. Hundreds, maybe thousands of the pagan
shamans and members of the elite classes were mass ordained (some then, some
later) as Cohens or Levites (Hebrew priestly caste and sub-caste).
It is to be expected that some of the rabbis,
as well as other oriental Judaics and their families, stayed on to nurture the
faith, training lay teachers and rabbis from among the Khazars. And, of course,
they must have intermarried, at least to some degree.
While this could mean that a drop or two of semi-Semitic
blood entered the gene pool, it was minimal.
Moreover, oriental Judaic Sephardic bloodlines
were already mixed and mottled, e.g., with Canaanites, Edomites, Idumeans and a
host of other regional tribes from there to Egypt and up and down the Arabian
Peninsula.
Essentially, the Sephardim
are Arab Jews
or Judaized Arabs,
whichever you prefer.
While neither ethnic group really wants to
hear about it, Jews and Arabs are intermixed. Did you know that Yemen, like old
Khazaria, once had a monarch and upper classes that converted?
Beginning c.390, it became a Judaic kingdom
for a time, called Himayar. Like in other parts of ancient Arabia, there were
already Judaic tribes of one kind or another living there. Some of Muhammad’s
early jihads were against Arab Jews since most of them refused to follow the
new prophet.
John Tiffany had some interesting quotations
and comments in his Barnes Review article on the Khazars, including an account
by an Arab historian which contains some interesting information.
“According to a Moslem account found in
al-Bakri’s Book of Kingdoms and Roads, written in the 11th. Century, it [the
conversion] happened in this way:
“‘The reason for the conversion to Judaism of
the king of the Khazars, who had previously been a pagan, is as follows. He had
adopted Christianity. Then he recognized its falsehood and discussed this
matter, which greatly worried him, with one of his high officials. The latter
said to him,
“‘Oh king, those in possession of sacred
scriptures fall into three groups. Summon them and ask them to state their
case, then follow the one who is in possession of the truth.’
“So he sent to the Christians for a bishop.
Now there was with the king a Jew, skilled in argument, who engaged him (the
bishop) in disputation. He asked the bishop: ‘What do you say of Moses, the son
of Amran, and the torah which was revealed to him?’
“The bishop replied: ‘Moses is a prophet and
the torah speaks the truth.’ Then the Jew said to the king: ‘He has already
admitted the truth of my creed. Ask him now what he believes in.’
“So the king asked him and he replied, ‘I say
that Jesus the Messiah is the son of Mary, he is the Word, and he has revealed
the mysteries in the name of God.’
“Then the Jew said to the king of the Khazars:
‘He preaches a doctrine which I know not, while he accepts my propositions.’
But the bishop was not strong in producing evidence.
“Then the king asked for a Muslim, and they
sent him a scholarly, clever man who was good at arguments. But the Jew hired
someone who poisoned him on the journey, and he died. And the Jew succeeded in
winning the king for his faith, so that the embraced Judaism.’ ~ Tiffany, John,
“The Khazars ~ Non-Semitic Jews,” The Barnes Review, Vol. III, No. 7, July
1997.
talmudic
.
The coming of the Talmudic religion to
Khazaria began with the upper classes. It took time for the faith to spread
among the common people. While it eventually did grow and flourish, in the
beginning it was still in a multicultural milieu. For example, in a stance
befitting its status at an international trade crossroads, and since
mercenaries of many religions served in the Khazar military, a tolerance for
Christianity and Islam continued. Perhaps the folk in more remote locations
continued on with their shamanism, or as is done with most new religions,
blended and incorporated the old beliefs with the new.
Dr. Koestler tells us a bit about the
beginning of the decline of the empire in the mid to late 900s. But their new
religion did not really decline at all. By that time, their Khazarian brand of
Judaism was well entrenched. Even when the Kievan Rus were asserting their own
sovereignty, and just before they stopped paying tribute to the Khaghan, the
Khazars tried to prevent this by religiously recruiting the ruler. As history
shows, this sometimes does the trick, but in the case of the Kievan Rus, it was
not to be.
“The first non-Arab mention of Khazaria after
the fatal year 965 seems to occur in a travel report by Ibrahim Ibn Jakub, the
Spanish-Jewish ambassador to Otto the Great, who, writing probably in 973,
describes the Khazars as still flourishing during his time. Next in
chronological order is the account of the Russian Chronicle of Jews from
Khazaria arriving in Kiev AD986 in their misfired attempt to convert Vladimir
to their faith.” Koestler.
PART ONE:
ReplyDeleteI think that I would tend to agree more with the findings of Dr Karl Skorecki:
'The Cohanim - DNA Connection'
'The fascinating story of how DNA studies confirm an ancient biblical tradition'
by Rabbi Yaakov Kleiman
aish dot com
"In a second study, Dr. Skorecki and associates gathered more DNA samples and expanded their selection of Y chromosome markers. Solidifying their hypothesis of the Cohens' common ancestor, they found that a particular array of six chromosomal markers was found in 97 of the 106 Cohens tested. This collection of markers has come to be known as the Cohen Modal Hapoltype (CMH) -- the standard genetic signature of the Jewish priestly family. The chances of these findings happening at random is greater than one in 10,000.
"The finding of a common set of genetic markers in both Ashkenazi and Sephardi Cohanim worldwide clearly indicates an origin pre-dating the separate development of the two communities around 1000 CE. Date calculation based on the variation of the mutations among Cohanim today yields a time frame of 106 generations from the ancestral founder of the line, some 3,300 years -- the approximate time of the Exodus from Egypt, the lifetime of Aaron HaCohen."
Just as crypto-Jews, who appeared to convert to Christianity centuries ago, to gain entrance to countries from which Jews had been banned, are now being 'converted' back to Judaism, those converting cannot do so and enter Israel unless they can demonstrate ancient Jewish lineage that is still intact today, maintained through centuries of careful interbreeding between similar families, who have striven to maintain the purity of Jewish lineage.
ABSTRACT:
DeleteJesus of Nazareth asks Talmudic Jews:
Why is my language not clear to you Talmudic Jews?
It’s because you are unable to hear what I say.
YOU BELONG TO YOUR FATHER, the DEVIL, and you want to carry out YOUR FATHER’S desires.
The reason you do not hear is that YOU DO NOT BELONG TO GOD.”
He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is NO TRUTH IN HIM. When he lies, he speaks his NATIVE LANGUAGE, for he is a LIAR and THE FATHER OF LIES.
Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!
Can any of you prove me guilty of sin?
If I am telling the truth, why don’t you believe me?
Whoever belongs to God hears what God says.
The reason you do not hear is that YOU DO NOT BELONG TO GOD.”
John 8:43-47
NOW you can do your DNA studies all the way back to Satan.
PART TWO:
ReplyDeleteI think that Dr Skorecki's findings demonstrate that the Ashkenazim were from Jewish lineage in the very beginning also, and merely 'converted' back to their original faith.
I also feel that Dr Skorecki's genetic findings support the Jewish belief in the Jews being a separate race. At least, they are 'separate' in their sense of understanding, and wish to maintain the uniqueness of their particular genetic strain, as the article '100,000 Radiations' by Barry Chamish, and the sterilizations of black Ethiopian Jews in Israel with Depo Provera amply testify, along with the stringent race laws of Israel today.
The statistically proven unwillingness of the vast majority of Jews to entertain the idea of miscegenation also demonstrates this very clearly, whilst Jewish politicians in governments in many other countries seek to force miscegenation upon all other races, to breed them out of existence as distinct races.
Jews erroneously consider that their souls alone come directly from the substance of God Himself, and that they are eternally pure from all sin, sin being merely a temporary type of pollution that they acquire from the Gentile souls, that can be purged from them and directed back to it's original source, that is, the satanic Gentile souls themselves, by means of blood rituals, such as Kapparot, the annual killing of a chicken for instance, by each Jew, so that the soul of the innocent chicken, held to be the equivalent in any case of any Gentile soul, as we are all supposed to be demonic animal souls ourselves, 'pig souls' even, in fact according to the Talmud, to accept all the karma acquired by each Jew on their behalf, a little black magic crucifixion of a chicken 'Jesus' every year for every Jew.
But Jews regard Gentile souls as non-living, and originating from the three dark, feminine lower hellish spheres of creation from the substance of Satan himself, guilty of all sin and sinful propensity, even before entrance into the womb, of fundamentally different substance to themselves, that is eternally irredeemable, who must all be exterminated and sent to dwell in hell under the Angel Duma, from where they came in the first place, according to Jewish belief.
The idea that any Gentile could ever be truly accepted as a convert, despite the 'front' that is maintained by the Jews, is literally impossible. Jews can be seen to sterilize or kill those who are not seen as real Jews when they try to intrude.
The Jewish Talmud itself states that all Gentiles are to be killed, leaving only Jews to possess this world, so they will be very picky about who they allow to join them in that venture. A satanic demon soul cannot be converted according to their belief; it is what it is forever.
I do not support the erroneous notion of 'Yahweh' being God by the way, and consider the Judaic faith to be a pseudo-mystical terrorist crime cult that should merely be proscribed by international law worldwide, with all it's adherents being made subject to reeducation, and possibly some form of conversion, as even Theodor Herzl suggested, recommending that all Jews convert together to avoid any further problems faced by the Jewish people.
Genius, no Jews from Ethiopia were "sterilised with Depo Provera." If you had half a brain you would know that Depo Provera is a 90-day form of birth control. To boot, the claim that Jews from Ethiopia were forced to take 90-day birth control is an admitted hoax. Ha'aretz, the media outlet that pushed that story to English speakers has admitted that it isnt true and in fact insulted its readership by saying that anyone who believed it was a racist themself.
DeleteAs for the rest of your comment, sheer nonsense. Jews are an ethno-religious group just like the Druse, Yazidi, Mandaeans and hundreds of other groups. There is no such thing as "race."
the word Israel mean "slave of Allah (al= the,ilaha = God; Allah. It was title of Ya'qoob (Jacob). Jews were chosen to be the role model as long as they followed Torah. However with coming of the last Prophet and messenger of Allah i.e. Muhammad (p.b.u.h)now Muslims are chosen to be the role model as they only possess the absolutely protected book of Allah i.e. the Quran. Jews had wrong meaning of chosen i.e. the spoiled broth!
ReplyDeleteTalmud is written by the most corrupt and racist Jewish religious scholars. Jews were Muslims but they forgot their original name and adopted a tribal name. likewise Christians when they followed Jesus (p.b.u.h) were Muslims (meaning one who is obedient to Allah and one who possess peace); however when they fell in the trap of Rabbi Paul, they also forgot their true name!
You slaves of allah are just as bad as the jews in your ideology. only difference is jews are generally clever but muslims tend to be imbecils due to first cousin marriage, but both are extremely bigoted towards all the rest of humanity. have a nice life slave.
DeleteSays a Muslim, a man whose holy book commands husbands to beat their wives (Sura 4, Ayah 34). Yeah, great examples.
DeleteWho are the Jews?
ReplyDeleteSimply put, the Jews are war mongering baby killing pedophiles hell bent on world domination.
How did the Jews end up in Palestine?
Simply put, the Jews ended up in Palestine because they are war mongering baby killing pedophiles hell bent on world domination.
THE END!
excellent and much needed info, the better to understand the foe..
ReplyDelete"Strictly speaking it is INCORRECT to call an Ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an israelite or a Hebrew." (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).
ReplyDelete"Edom is in Modern Jewry" ~ The Jewish Encyclopedia 1905 edition
"JEWS BEGAN TO CALL THEMSELVES HEBREWS AND ISRAELITES IN 1860". ~ Encyclopedia Judaica 1971 Vol 10:23 (They were Edomites/Kenites before that, hmmm, how did they change their DNA/genes in the 19th century???) !!!!!
Stop making up references. You only make yourself look more ignorant. The phrase "Edom is in modern Jewry" relates to the mass conversion of Idumaea in the Haonaean Era. If you are too stupid to understand that simple phrase you have no business posting.
Delete“Zionism is Judaism, and Judaism is unthinkable without Zionism.” (Harper’s Encyclopedia of United States History, Vol. X, “Zionists”).
ReplyDelete“Some call it Marxism (Communism), I call it JUDAISM.” – Rabbi S. Wise, The American Bulletin, May 5, 1935. (Judaism is nothing but disguised, camouflaged Communism, therefore, Zionism is nothing but disguised, camouflaged Communism) !!!
"The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart's blood of the Jewish Religion (Judaism). Whatever laws, customs or ceremonies we observe - whether we are orthodox, conservative, reform or merely spasmodic sentamentalists, we follow the Talmud. It is our Common Law." (The Talmud, by Herman Wouk, a Jew)
“Communism was Jewish created, Jewish proposed, Jewish financed, Jewish led and Jewish operated. The most muderous regime this planet has ever known, was Jewish through & through.” ~ ("The Secret Force" by Maurice Pinay) !!!
Wise was also known as "the red rabbi" because of his promotion of communism. He committed atrocious crimes against his own people before and during WW2 both in America and Europe AND did it on presidential approved letterhead! I have also read a few stories by women he raped, might I add. He was not a nice man. It was him who told American Jews that they need not worry about their European cousins and made sure that the Europeans stayed put because as we know now, they were marked for death because they were either unsuitable for the "New Israel" or did not wish to relocate to a sandy desert. I am sure you will find references to that man many places in this blog. And he is considered by most American Jews to be a "great man".
ReplyDeletekhazar was turks . after gokturk empire they live near to russia. first place the leader call 3 man from 3 relegen and they choose to be jews because they dont want problem with cristians or muslims. if choose muslim then they have problem cristians and if choose cristians they have problem with muslims. but they live tottaal other jew i thing no interest zionism.
ReplyDeleteWell documented...
ReplyDeletePlease, change your font colour to black on white!
ReplyDeleteexcellent and much needed info, the better to understand the foe..
ReplyDeleteexcellent and much needed info, the better to understand the foe..
ReplyDeleteMasal Oku
Çocuklar için hem eğlenceli hem de eğitici çizgi filmleri bir araya derliyoruz. Sayfamızı ziyaret edebilirsiniz.
ReplyDelete