WORLD POPULATION TO PASS 7 BILLION ~SO WHAT

 Consider the war on children, the war on humanity in today's world. The chemicals, enforced population and birthrights (IE China), the abortion holocaust, the deformed due to war crimes, the horrors of GMO, not to mention plain starvation. Genocide of the lowest degree. Now read the truth as Zen sees it. Makes perfect sense to me.

The devious filth known as The Powers That Be have always hated the people. In fact, although I have no proof, I have always suspected that the Plagues of Europe (Black, Bubonic, etc) which culled many millions, leaving their land and properties up for grabs, were not accidental at all. This culling, as you will read below, is not new at all. 

Zen's words are in blue.  I added comments, quotes and illustrations in green.

My question is:

WHO DIED AND MADE THESE F*CKERS GOD?

Did Malthus  REALLY call for killing off the poor (Or, as Kissinger so politely and humanely put it, “the useless eaters”?)

Yep. He did. He called for increased mortality among the poor:

All the children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons… To act consistently therefore, we should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use.

Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits.

In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague.

In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations. (Book IV, Chap. V) ~ Malthus, Essay on the Principle of Population

And here we have a precious quote from one of the "illustrious" elite, Margaret Sanger, goddess of abortion, genocide and racism, all part of her concept of population control:

The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it. ~ Margaret Sanger

 

October 16, 2011

By Zen Gardner

Cause for concern? 

Only if this imposed parasitic world system isn't rectified. 

There's plenty for all, it's just being hoarded and deliberately withheld and manipulated.

What? 

Have you too been convinced there's "too many people"? 

Can you imagine an ant colony thinking there's too many babies? 

They WANT offspring.

What the heck's wrong with people? 

Got too many for local resources? Move to the country!

Here's today's scare, compliments of the United Nations, of course:

Room for one more?

World population to reach 7 BILLION in next few days

Children most likely to be born in Asia-Pacific region

Fears over pressure on food supply and medical care
.

 Going to the beach in China

The world's population looks set to smash through the seven billion barrier in the next few days, according to the United Nations.

It comes just 12 years since the total reached six billion ~ with official estimates saying the figure will top eight billion in 2025 and 10 billion before the end of the century.

And it is most likely the baby will be born in the Asia-Pacific region - where the population growth rate is higher than anywhere else in the world.

Scroll down for video...

Crowded: The world's population looks set to smash through the seven billion barrier in the next few days ~ and it is most likely the baby will be born in the Asia-Pacific region, such as Mumbai, India, pictured here

Experts say the pace of growth ~ which has seen the number of people on the planet triple since 1940 ~ poses an increasing danger to citizens.

With more people to feed, house and provide medical care for, they say the world's resources look set to come under more strain than ever before.

As populations stabilize in the industrial world, almost all growth in the near future is expected to take place in developing countries.

Read more: here

I suppose, according the Malthus, this sort of image
explains our right to kill off all those unwanted brown skinned people?

IT'S ALL ABOUT CONTROL

The PTBs want a population they can control. 

That we are many freaks them out, as per the Occupy Movement. 

They're getting the crap scared out of them.

The Georgia Guidestones, which should have been investigated and disclosed to the people of Georgia and the United States and the world as to what they were intended for and who did them, say the Earth's population should be limited to 500 million inhabitants.

Says who, I ask.

 .

Does THIS attitude explain what is being done to Africa and has been going on for many decades? 

Or to the Black race in North America? 

Or Brown people ANYWHERE on the globe?

Social and scientific engineers have been tinkering with humanity at the behest of mega powerful wealthy elites for eons. Now it's accelerating at such a rate we're apparently approaching an event horizon of sorts, a "singularity".

So what's the truth on population growth?

Try this out.

Simplistic?

Go ahead and support wars, sterilization and depopulation. Your viewpoint is manipulated. 

(ED: We will keep breeding for them regardless.)

Zen

www.zengardner.com

 I don't THINK so!!!! Seems to have gone the opposite direction in today's Western world.

More information here: 

THE TRUTH:  

OVERPOPULATION IS A MYTH

THE LIES:

MALTHUSIAN SNOBS PRAY FOR CURE TO OVERPOPULATION

AN ESSAY ON THE PRINCIPLE OF POPULATION

SESAME STREET INTRODUCES POOR MUPPET TO TEACH ABOUT POVERTY

By Noor

October 11, 2011

There's a new kid on the block on "Sesame Street."

The long-running children's show debuted Lily, a hot pink, 7-year-old-girl Muppet in a primetime special that highlights childhood poverty and hunger, Entertainment Weekly reported.  Lily will then join the regular cast of Sesame Street characters.

Lily’s family background reflects the bitter economic reality of the 17 million American children who live without regular access to affordable and nutritious food, the magazine reported. In the creation of Lily it was decided to fashion her so that, to depict her uncertainty in life, her eyes would be placed to seem cast down most of the time.

“We thought long and hard about how do we really represent this from a child’s point of view?” Jeanette Betancourt, Sesame Workshop’s senior vice president for outreach and educational practices, said on Monday morning in a telephone interview. “We felt it was best to have this new Muppet take this on in a positive way and a healthy way.”

Ms. Betancourt said that she and her colleagues spent time considering all the elements of Lily’s character that would make her realistic but empathetic to young viewers: her style of dress, her voice performance and even mannerisms, like her tendency to look down at her feet rather than make eye contact when she is speaking to other characters.

“She wants to talk about this topic,” she said, “because she knows it will help many other families and children, but it isn’t an easy topic to talk about in the first place.”

The news that Sesame Street plans to debut a poverty-stricken Muppet seems to be immensely sad, but also incredibly important.

Most parents try to keep their kids from the harsher realities of life, especially when they’re young enough to watch Big Bird on television. But with so many children going hungry, perhaps this is an opportunity to teach empathy.

Lily, will appear on a special about hunger, portraying a child whose family has difficulty getting enough food. Many children in Sesame Street’s preschooler audience are likely familiar with the idea of donating food, because their families have contributed to canned-food or sandwich-making drives at school, church, or elsewhere.

Country music singer Brad Paisley and his wife, actress Kimberly Williams Paisley, will host the hour-long show, titled "Growing Hope against Hunger."

“We are honored that Sesame Street, with its long history of tackling difficult issues with sensitivity, caring and warmth, asked us to be a part of this important project,” the couple said in a statement. The show will aired Sunday, Oct. 9. 

The special episode is sponsored by Wal-Mart.

Ain’t THAT a kicker?

Don’t get me started on WalMart and this great hypocrisy!

THE TOP 5 FACTS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE WEALTHIEST ONE PERCENT OF AMERICANS

 

October 3, 2011  

By Zaid Jilani

As the ongoing occupation of Wall Street by hundreds of protesters enters its third week ~ and as protests spread to other cities such as Boston and Los Angeles ~ demonstrators have endorsed a new slogan: “We are the 99 percent.”

 

This slogan refers an economic struggle between 99 percent of Americans and the richest one percent of Americans, who are increasingly accumulating a greater share of the national wealth to the detriment of the middle class.

It may shock you exactly how wealthy this top 1 percent of Americans is. ThinkProgress has assembled five facts about this class of super-rich Americans:

1. The Top 1 Percent of Americans Owns 40 Percent of the Nation’s Wealth:

. 

As Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitz points out, the richest 1 percent of Americans now own 40 percent of the nation’s wealth. Sociologist William Domhoff illustrates this wealth disparity using 2007 figures where the top 1 percent owned 42 percent of the country’s financial wealth (total net worth minus the value of one’s home). How much does the bottom 80 percent own? Only 7 percent:

As Stiglitz notes, this disparity is much worse than it was in the past, as just 25 years ago the top 1 percent owned 33 percent of national wealth.

2. The Top 1 Percent of Americans Take Home 24 Percent Of National Income:

While the richest 1 percent of Americans take home almost a quarter of national income today, in 1976 they took home just 9 percent ~ meaning their share of the national income pool has nearly tripled in roughly three decades.

.

3. The Top 1 Percent of Americans Own Half of The Country’s Stocks, Bonds, And Mutual Funds:

The Institute for Policy Studies illustrates this massive disparity in financial investment ownership, noting that the bottom 50 percent of Americans own only .5 percent of these investments:

4. The Top 1 Percent of Americans Have Only 5 Percent of the Nation’s Personal Debt:

 

Using 2007 figures, sociologist William Domhoff points out that the top 1 percent have 5 percent of the nation’s personal debt while the bottom 90 percent have 73 percent of total debt:

 5. The Top 1 Percent Are Taking In More of The Nation’s Income than at Any Other Time since the 1920s: 

Not only are the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans taking home a tremendous portion of the national income, but their share of this income is greater than at any other time since the Great Depression, as the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities illustrates in this chart using 2007 data:

As Professor Elizabeth Warren has explained, “there is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody…Part of the underlying social contract is you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.” More and more often that is not occurring, giving the protesters ample reason to take to the streets.

UPDATE 

For an excellent resource about how much income Americans at these different income levels have, see the Tax Policy Center. The top one percent of Americans has an average income of $1.5 million.

This article was created by the Center for American Progress Action Fund