Lobbyists
wine and dine eager Washington journalists in a campaign to undo Obama’s
“reset” on Russia
Ed Noor: This article was originally posted in October, 2011 in Salon.com. When you finish reading it, and it is a tad lengthy, you can only come to the same conclusion as so many others: the situation in Russia has been in the active works and planning for quite some time. The names of those involved in today’s coup of Ukraine are mentioned in the planning throughout and have been involved for years. The bad news is that this is not going to go away. Putin has promised tit for tat so things will assuredly escalate since the USraelis have no other option at this point: they have literally painted themselves into a corner. We are heading for some very unsettling times. Remember that bucket list I posted about last week?
.
Over the summer reporter Eli Lake of the Washington Times wrote a series of provocative stories about U.S.-Russia relations and the alleged failure of “reset,” the Obama administration’s policy to improve ties to Moscow. The most sensational ran on Page One of the Times on July 22 and led to several follow-ups. It alleged that a bomb blast near the U.S. Embassy in Tbilisi, Georgia, the previous September had been “traced to a plot run by a Russian military intelligence officer, according to an investigation by the Georgian Interior Ministry.” The Russia officer was identified as Yevgeny Borisov.
.
Over the summer reporter Eli Lake of the Washington Times wrote a series of provocative stories about U.S.-Russia relations and the alleged failure of “reset,” the Obama administration’s policy to improve ties to Moscow. The most sensational ran on Page One of the Times on July 22 and led to several follow-ups. It alleged that a bomb blast near the U.S. Embassy in Tbilisi, Georgia, the previous September had been “traced to a plot run by a Russian military intelligence officer, according to an investigation by the Georgian Interior Ministry.” The Russia officer was identified as Yevgeny Borisov.
.
“If true, a Russian-sponsored
attack on a U.S. Embassy would constitute the most serious crisis in
U.S.-Russian relations since the Cold War and put to lie any ‘reset’ in
bilateral relations,” Lake quoted GOP Sen. Mark Kirk as saying of his story. A
few days later, Lake reported, Kirk and four other senators ~ Jon Kyl, Lindsey
Graham, Joe Lieberman and John McCain ~ sent a letter to Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton demanding intelligence community briefings on the
incident.
.
.
Lake’s original report on the
bombing was sourced exclusively to government sources in Georgia, which fought
a war in 2008 with Russia, its mortal foe. For “balance” he included a quote
from the Russian embassy denying any official involvement. The story was highly
favourable to the Georgian government’s interests, as are a number of other
stories that Lake has written about Georgia in recent years. During that period
the neoconservative lobbyists at the Washington firm of Orion Strategies, which
has received more than $1 million in fees from Georgia’s government since 2004,
have worked closely with Lake.
.
.
Orion is run by Randy Scheunemann, a former advisor to Donald Rumsfeld who helped set up the
Committee for the Liberation of Iraq and was a leading advocate for the U.S.
invasion in 2003. The committee in turn was created by the Project for the New
American Century (PNAC), whose other leaders included Robert Kagan and Bill
Kristol, founder and editor of the Weekly Standard. Scheunemann was John
McCain’s foreign policy advisor during his 2008 presidential campaign, and
later worked for Sarah Palin.
.
.
In 2010, Orion hired Michael Goldfarb, a McCain presidential
spokesman who previously worked for PNAC and who was a contributing editor at
the Weekly Standard (and who even as a lobbyist continues to periodically write
for the magazine). Lake is also an ardent conservative whose reporting
championed the Iraq war.
.
.
Orion seeks to create a media
echo chamber on Georgia and Russia. Essentially it works like this: Tbilisi’s
lobbyists generate contacts and information that they feed to sympathetic
journalists. Orion frequently arranges interviews with Georgian officials and,
not infrequently, stories centering on their charges magically appear soon
afterward. Orion has wined and dined some reporters on its tab or picked up
their travel expenses. There’s certainly nothing illegal about that but it’s
worth noting that lobbyists are barred from maintaining these sorts of
relationships with members of Congress because it so clearly presents, as we
say in Washington, at least the appearance of impropriety.
.
.
Orion is friendly to and works
with government officials and politicians who its reporter friends regularly
cite (especially McCain). Orion also works very closely with experts and
organizations cited by these reporters, like the Foreign
Policy Initiative, whose board of directors includes William
Kristol, Robert Kagan and other neocons from the PNAC and the Committee for the
Liberation of Iraq.
.
.
The journalists pick up on and
spread each other’s work and Goldfarb, naturally, hawks their stories at his Twitter feed. Just last week, he called a
new Lake story a “must read.” The piece at the Newsweek/Daily Beast,
featured an exclusive interview with Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili, who alleged that the bombing at the U.S.
Embassy was “ordered at the most senior levels of the Russian government.” He
was quoted as saying that Putin “is crazy about planning the individual details
of special operations … I cannot imagine somebody touching a topic as sensitive
as Georgia is for Russia, especially for Putin, without Putin having firsthand
knowledge or command of it.”
.
.
Orion helps create a collective
media reality that policymakers have to respond to. Other foreign governments also
play this game, as do liberal and conservative interest groups, but rarely as
well or so brazenly.
.
.
Disclosure records filed by Orion
show that between mid-2009 and mid-2011 it set up seven interviews with senior
Georgian government officials for Lake, who quoted them prominently in stories
that centered on their various allegations.
.
.
Lake also attended 10 events in
Washington with Georgian officials or Hill staffers and had three email or
phone discussions with Goldfarb about Georgia. (Orion is more thorough than
most lobby shops in recording its media outreach, but that number seems
improbably low given all the other help it provided Lake.) And on seven
different occasions Goldfarb billed his firm for meals or drinks with Lake,
usually with other journalists along, and four times with Georgian officials as
dining or drinking companions.
.
.
In May of 2011, Goldfarb paid
$977.24 for a dinner at Morton’s steakhouse, attended by Georgia’s
Minister for Reintegration Eka Tkeleshuili, Lake and several other journalists,
including Dan Halper of the Weekly Standard. This was almost surely not the
last contact between Orion and Lake before the embassy bombing story ran, but
lobby disclosure records are filed biannually and Orion’s last disclosure
covered the period only up through June 30.
.
.
Meanwhile, in September of 2010
alone Goldfarb billed Orion $300 for a dinner at Buck’s Fishing and Camping with Lake and
another reporter; $172.62 for a tab at Heritage of
India for Lake, Georgia’s deputy national security advisor,
and Svante Cornell of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road
Studies Program; and another $460 bill for “refreshments” for the latter group
that same night, at Morton’s. (The previous month Lake had quoted Cornell to
buttress one of his anti-Russian pieces.)
.
.
Lake’s stories have had impact,
especially the report on Russia’s alleged bombing of the U.S. embassy in
Tbilisi, and they have been widely circulated in the mainstream media, and even
more in the conservative media. Daniel
Halper of the Weekly Standard called the story a “big scoop.” Jennifer Rubin of the Washington Post complained afterward that Moscow’s “human
rights atrocities, campaign of intimidation and even violence haven’t caused
the administration to rethink its policy of appeasement, dressed up as
‘reset’.”
.
.
Joshua Foust, a fellow
at the American Security Project, concluded that while evidence for “Russian
culpability in the incidents was compelling,” it was unlikely that
President Dmitry Medvedev or Prime Minister Vladimir Putin “would be so stupid
as to order these small, nasty and counterproductive operations. These acts
caused mercifully little damage in Georgia and a lot of political damage to
Russia in Washington.”
.
.
Indeed, Lake, seeking to bolster
his story, reported a few days later that “U.S. intelligence
agencies concluded in a classified report late last year that Russia’s military
intelligence was responsible for the bomb at the U.S. embassy.” He quoted an
unnamed U.S. official on this classified report as saying, “It is written
without hedges, and it confirms the Georgian account.”
.
.
Yet he soon filed another story that
quoted an administration official as saying there was “no consensus” on responsibility for the
Tbilisi blast. And then on Aug. 4 he filed yet one more dispatch saying that the CIA concluded that Borisov, the
Russian officer who allegedly coordinated the attack, was “acting on orders
from Russian military intelligence headquarters” but that the State
Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research “assessed that Mr. Borisov was
acting as a rogue agent.”
.
.
In other words, Lake softened his
big story, and while it might be true it was perhaps too thin to have initially
run on the basis of Georgian government sources. A New York Times story that followed
Lake’s reporting said the “intelligence community has apparently been unable to
reach a clear consensus about who is responsible for the bombings, which has
revived old differences in Washington about what the United States relationship
with Russia should be.”
.
.
In an email, Lake said his
reporting “speaks for itself.” He acknowledged dining and drinking with
Goldfarb on the seven occasions cited but said he had paid for his share of the
bills.
.
.
Lake is now the national security
correspondent for Daily Beast/Newsweek. Goldfarb declined to comment
.
.
ORION’S BELT
In addition to Georgia, Orion
Strategies has represented Macedonia and Taiwan, and a few domestic
clients. Scheunemann is by all accounts an effective lobbyist. “He
understands Washington well,” one of his competitors told me. “He’s good at
persuading people and [his firm is] especially good with the media.” The latter
is primarily due to Goldfarb, who has many reporter friends and regularly
drinks with them, and a circle of conservative policy types, at Morton’s
steakhouse.
.
.
Georgia and Russia fought a war
in 2008 that was generally portrayed in the American media as a David vs.
Goliath tale, with spunky little Georgia in the role of the former and longtime
boogeyman Russia serving as the latter. Suffice it to say that the truth is more complicated than that. The fact that Georgia is strongly
pro-U.S. and has sent troops to Iraq and Afghanistan has no doubt helped
Tbilisi sell this fairy tale to the American media.
.
.
Georgia and its lobbyists, led by
Orion, have also peddled stories supporting the need for American arms sales to
Tbilisi and the utter failure of “reset.” Once again, the truth is messier.
Vladimir Putin’s Russia is certainly corrupt and oppressive and
anti-democratic, but Mikhail Saakashvili’s Georgia exhibits the
same problems, if to a lesser degree. The State Department’s human rights report has “widespread
allegations of intimidation and pressure, flawed vote-counting and tabulation
processes,” and says that Georgia is “dominated by a single party.” It noted a
“lack of due process, government pressure on the judiciary, and that
individuals remained in prison politically motivated reasons.” Even the
neocon-leaning Washington Post editorial page has said “that the Russian
government’s repression and corruption “does not preclude cooperation” and that
the Obama reset has “achieved gains.”
.
.
Jennifer Rubin, a writer for Commentary until late 2010, is
another friend of Orion. She is one of a number of right-wing versifiers whose
flimsy reporting ~ in her case little more than eager repetition of GOP talking
points and unsubstantiated terror porn ~ have landed them jobs at the
Washington Post. Orion’s lobbyists have briefed her and set up interviews for
her, and she has attended their Washington events for Georgian officials. In
February of 2010, when Rubin was still at Commentary, Goldfarb billed
Orion $321.88 for drinks at the posh Ten Penh restaurant, for her and
several other journalists.
.
.
Rubin is a reliable mouthpiece
for Georgia’s anti-Russian themes. During the week of Dec. 13, 2010, Goldfarb contacted
Rubin to discuss Georgia. Eight days later, Rubin wrote an item saying that in
regard to the Russia reset, “We need to examine what are we giving up and what
are we getting.” She proposed the U.S. government consider “robust assistance
to Georgia.” On Jan. 4 she published another item on Russia, citing a story by
Lake and quoting Jamie Fly of the Foreign Policy Initiative (hear the echo?),
who told her that, “Despite U.S. efforts to placate Russia in return for
support on Iran, Russia has done little more than it did during the Bush
administration to halt Tehran’s march toward a nuclear weapon.”
.
.
During the week of May 29 of this
year, Goldfarb logged a conversation with Rubin about “Georgian security.” On
June 3, she wrote a story for Washingtonpost.com
that suggested it “might be an excellent time to explore” whether Russian reset
was “all give and no get for the United States and the West.” Rubin’s story
cited Senators Echo and Echo (McCain and Lieberman) complaining that a
‘reset’ consists “largely of acceding to Russian demands with no corresponding
progress in Russian human rights or conduct toward its neighbours.”
.
.
In an email reply Rubin wrote:
“My views on Russia, human rights, Eastern Europe, Georgia, etc. are long
standing and well known. I invariably take the side of democracies against
tyrannies.”
.
.
(Incidentally, Rubin is one of
many media junketeers who have trekked off to the Middle East on the tab of
pro-Israeli organizations, the true masters at spinning and pampering journalists.
Earlier this year she and a group of media colleagues attended the Herzliya
Conference “With the region experiencing great upheaval and Israel facing a
variety of domestic and international challenges, this is a particularly
opportune time to hear from Israelis and listen to Israeli officials,” she wrote at the time. Airline and travel
expenses, she disclosed, were picked up by the Emergency
Committee for Israel whose board includes Kristol and whose
chief advisers include Goldfarb.)
.
.
Goldfarb also logged multiple
contacts with Matthew Continetti, an associate editor at the Weekly Standard,
including five meals or drinks he paid for from his Orion expense account. In
March of 2010, the Orion lobbyist had a “lunch discussion” on Georgia at the Blue Duck Tavern with Continetti and two
others from the Weekly Standard. The same month he and Continetti dined ~ on
Goldfarb’s tab, according to disclosure filings, for $209.68 ~ at Shelley’s Backroom.
.
.
Two months later, Orion paid for
Continetti and several other journalists and John Noonan of the FPI to travel
to Tbilisi and for their lodging there. Goldfarb accompanied them (as did
Scheunemann) and reported spending $1,125.06 on drinks and meals for Continetti
and other members of his posse. The following month Continetti wrote an
embarrassing story (even by the promiscuous standards of the Weekly Standard)
titled “In Russia’s Shadow: The surprising resilience of Georgian democracy.”
It praised Saakashvili’s government for its policies on everything from
electrification to economics.
.
.
“Right now the big domestic
initiative is an economic freedom bill. If it passes, referendums will be
required for all tax increases, and Georgia’s debt-to-GDP ratio will be capped
at 60 percent. Mention these reforms to American libertarians, and their mouths
water.”
.
.
Continenti’s byline acknowledged
that he “visited Georgia on a trip sponsored by its government,” which doesn’t
change the fact that this was more an exercise in public relations than
journalism. Essentially, his story was a piece of propaganda bought and paid
for by lobbyists for the Georgian government.
.
.
Continetti has written a number
of other stories on Georgia that didn’t mention his ties to Orion, including an
August 2010 story that cited Lake’s
reporting and carried the headline of “Time to Reset ‘Reset’; Russian
intransigence on every front.”
.
.
Continetti did not reply to a
request for comment.
.
.
LOVING GEORGIA
In February of 2009, James Kirchick, an assistant editor at
the New Republic, wrote an article called “Pravda
on the Potomac; Russian propaganda descends on Washington,” which
criticized Moscow’s use of P.R. firms to manipulate the American media. In
order to “whitewash its increasing authoritarianism,” Kirchick wrote, Russia’s
public relations flunkies had spent “a lot of time trying to soften up the
press” and sought to “wine, dine, and flatter” journalists and VIPs “into a
certain sympathy for the Russian perspective.” Moscow’s handlers, especially
Ketchum Inc., had scored “press coups” by setting up interviews with Russian
government officials and had even capitalized on their personal relationships
by reaching out to politicians they knew.
.
.
Orion does precisely the same
sort of work with journalists that Ketchum does, yet Kirchik has worked closely
with its lobbyists on behalf of Georgia. He joined the Goldfarb-financed
gatherings at Ten Penh and Buck’s Fishing and Camping mentioned above. Orion
has arranged interviews for him with Georgian officials. Apparently the press
is being educated by lobbyists who work for the side you’re on, but is being
“softened up” when they work for the other side.
.
.
Kirchick also was one of the
journalists along with Goldfarb and Continetti on the Georgia junket ~ which
took place little more than a year after his “Pravda on the Potomac” article
ran. His “Letter From Tbilisi: Russia on their Mind”
hailed “the young and exuberantly pro-Western” Saakashvili. He described
Georgia as “a small, embattled democracy in a tough neighbourhood.” The piece
said “government ministries in Tbilisi feel like the offices of McKinsey &
Company.” (Which apparently is a good thing.)
.
.
Kirchick, who noted in the story
that his trip was sponsored by Georgia, said in a phone conversation from
Prague, where he is based:
.
.
Most governments lobby in
Washington; the question it comes down to is how you view that government. I
don’t think it’s hypocritical to write about Russian lobbying, which was new at
the time, and then go on the trip to Georgia as long as I disclosed that it was
sponsored by their government. I’m an opinion journalist and I’m obviously more
partial to Georgia than to Russia. The suggestion that I wrote anything more
supportive of Georgia because I went on the trip or Goldfarb bought me a drink
doesn’t hold up.
.
.
Josh Rogin of Foreign Policy has had frequent contacts with
Orion on Georgia as well; Goldfarb logged 12 discussions by phone or email, as
well as three interviews with Georgian government officials, including the
president and the prime minister. In March of 2010, according to disclosure
filings, Goldfarb spent $884.95 on hockey tickets for a game at the Verizon
Center that Rogin attended.
.
.
More than other reporters
discussed here, Rogin has been fair-minded in his items on Georgia and he
reaches out to all sides. Yet on balance his stories are broadly sympathetic to
Tbilisi. These include one titled “Russia threatens to wreck the reset” and
another in March of last year that was based on an “exclusive interview” with
Saakashvili arranged by Orion. It was, predictably, a softball
affair.
.
.
“I meet with a wide variety of
officials and consultants as part of my regular reporting duties in a variety
of settings, and I’m confident my stories reflect my commitment to objectivity
and include the widest range of views available,” Rogin said in a reply by
email. He said that the Georgian ambassador to the U.S. was supposed to attend
the hockey game but didn’t turn up.
.
.
HACKS AND REPORTERS
In the end, I found it unpleasant
to write this story. When I first heard the broad details about it ~ from a
source that is pro-Russian but not a lobbyist and no one I knew previously ~ it
sounded like a fast, simple slam dunk. It didn’t turn out that way and when I
examined Orion’s disclosure records I discovered that I knew and liked a number
of the journalists that Goldfarb worked with, especially Eli Lake, whose
politics and journalistic conclusions I generally disagree with but who is a
tireless reporter who breaks important stories.
.
.
One of the magazines in question
has commissioned my work. When Howard Kurtz attacked me for an undercover piece
that exposed sleazy Washington lobbyists, Kirchick defended me. Orion also
represents an organization affiliated with George Soros’ Open Society Foundations,
which funds some of my current research (though not this article).
.
.
This, in part, is exactly why
working in Washington is so difficult. It’s a small town where politicians and
lobbyists and P.R. specialists and journalists know each other and socialize
together, and especially when they share a given political point of view. It
frequently leads to groupthink and can be ethically challenging.
.
.
I’m not proposing here that
journalists working with Orion are writing anything they don’t believe or that
Goldfarb bought them off with a meal (or sometimes a few). But I also can’t buy
Kirchick’s position that it all comes down to who’s doing the lobbying and how
that jibes with your personal opinion. That may be true for hacks like Rubin.
But those reporting on and analyzing complex foreign policy issues for the
public consumption should be more critical, not less, of points of view they
are sympathetic to.
.
.
Essentially, the argument is that
it’s OK to keep this sort of company with lobbyists because everyone else does.
That doesn’t seem adequate, even if true. Other explanations I heard (often on
a not-for-attribution basis and sometimes from journalists not cited here but
familiar with Orion’s work) also seemed unconvincing: They said they were
friends of Goldfarb, sometimes pre-dating their Georgia reporting, and so they
alternated picking up the check or thought it was OK for him to pay their bill.
.
.
The point here that it isn’t that
Russia is the good guy and Georgia is the bad guy. It’s that the situation is
more complicated than it often appears in the American media, which stems in
part from the outsize influence of Orion. The government of Georgia is well
served by that relationship, the American public not so much.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.