These creatures look pretty darn NWO Illuminati to me!
By Fyodor Lukyanov
March
30, 2012
BRICS
countries concluded their forth summit in New Delhi by urging a common approach
to Syria which would definitely exclude any outside interference. They
also agreed to make payments in local currencies (not dollars or euro) in
transfers between the group members. But the two remarkable moves do not
represent a total breakthrough in cooperation as the gradual approach of more
tense economic and political interaction becomes increasingly apparent.
BRICS
is a format which has long provoked a great deal of skepticism among
commentators. In the West it is viewed as an accidental and artificial
association.
ED: Is NATO a “natural” association?
But
despite those doubts, which at times are pretty well-grounded, the BRICS
countries regularly get together, attracting more and more attention from the
rest of the world.
BRICS is driven forward by the general situation in the world. Recipes for resolving international issues offered by the West either don’t work or produce the opposite effect.
ED: To a great extent, these measures were never intended to work
and, by producing the opposite effect, actually bring about the long term
desired results.
There
is a demand ~ so far rather vague ~ for alternative solutions, and as the cores
of big regions, BRICS countries are often best-situated to offer a comprehensive
global vision.
While
preliminary talks on this matter are starting to make small waves, so far this
ambition is just declaratory. BRICS has not yet realized its full potential as
an influential international entity.
Last
year, BRICS lost a good opportunity to position itself as very important
grouping when it failed to come to a consolidated position on the appointment
of a new IMF managing director after Dominique Strauss-Kahn resigned amid
scandal.
All
the states of the group preferred to make separate agreements with the United
States and Europe on the terms of support for their respective candidates.
BRICS
demonstrated rare unity on the Libyan issue when it was voted in the UN
Security Council in March 2011.
However,
their positions diverged on Syria early this year. The current consensus on
Syria achieved in India is very vague. Moreover, the seemingly
indifferent position by Russia and China when it comes to extending the United
Nations Security Council (UNSC) to include Brazil, India and South Africa has
angered those countries.
While
in New Delhi, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev said that they are strong
candidates to join the UNSC.
However,
Medvedev can show public support for the move because he knows that China will
oppose India in any case.
What holds BRICS together beyond their mutual belief in
multipolarity?
In
his program article on foreign policy published before the presidential
election, Vladimir Putin waxed positively about cooperation within BRICS,
laying emphasis on the fact that all BRICS countries not only have similar
views on a multi-polar world order, but share one and the same basic value ~
national sovereignty as a fundamental structural element of the world system.
This
concept is an alternative to the Western approach that is based on the premise
that today sovereignty is no longer as sacred and immutable as it was in the
past.
All
BRICS countries really enjoy almost full sovereignty.
They
have broad latitude in their actions, rooted in their material capabilities,
and they are not restricted by formal alliances. There are not so many states
in this category.
European
countries, for instance, do have an economic foundation but are often much more
tied up politically.
The
question is whether this conceptual community is enough to create a framework
that can be filled with economic, geopolitical and ideological content.
This process is slow and not destined to succeed, but the ability of BRICS to develop in the face of universal skepticism gives cause to hope that it will continue to evolve.
In
any case, BRICS countries still have plenty of room to maximize their great
potential.
The Justice of God: Zionist "Israeli" war upon the United States by subversion terror and acts of war: Herein is the Core of the Illuminist New World Order, the Judeo subversion of everything!
ReplyDeleteThe Justice of God: BRICS Just part of the New World Order with full complicity in the The Justice of God: Zionist "Israeli" war upon the United States by subversion terror and acts of war
ReplyDelete