Is anyone
really surprised that our children are becoming more and more illiterate these
days.
It seems a
bit ironic that they even publish such a story in the rag press which we can
easily presume even the illiterate masses of youth wouldn’t read even if they
could?
But is it
any surprise when we see the garbage they’re given to read, the nonsense
they’re given as entertainment on TV and the idiocy of the movies fed to them
from Hollywood which are supposed to pass as comedy but which are in fact
Hollywood itself laughing at them in their idiotic stupor thinking that the
drivel they’re fixated by is actually funny.
But of
course, if the ‘education’ system was actually about teaching children anything
then we’d have something to complain about wouldn’t we? But the fact is the
‘education’ system we’re led to believe is to teach our children on various
subjects to prepare them for a career in whatever field they may be interested
in is a complete farce.
"I
don't believe they would do it!"
How many times have you heard that from people who cannot suspend their disbelief long enough to look objectively at the possibility that the NWO/JWO is indeed a very nasty global conspiracy run by the monied elites?
Let philosopher Bertrand Russell make everything clear.
Who was Bertrand Russell?
According to Wikipedia, Russell was a very nice upstanding man indeed, a "British philosopher, logician, mathematician, historian, socialist, pacifist and social critic," no less.
In fact, Russell was descended from an old establishment family. He was a propagandist, whose job it was to propagate certain ideas in the service of the monied elites. He was instrumental in the project to wreck European and American culture through his chairmanship of the CIA sponsored Congresss for Cultural Freedom.
How many times have you heard that from people who cannot suspend their disbelief long enough to look objectively at the possibility that the NWO/JWO is indeed a very nasty global conspiracy run by the monied elites?
Let philosopher Bertrand Russell make everything clear.
Who was Bertrand Russell?
According to Wikipedia, Russell was a very nice upstanding man indeed, a "British philosopher, logician, mathematician, historian, socialist, pacifist and social critic," no less.
In fact, Russell was descended from an old establishment family. He was a propagandist, whose job it was to propagate certain ideas in the service of the monied elites. He was instrumental in the project to wreck European and American culture through his chairmanship of the CIA sponsored Congresss for Cultural Freedom.
Far from
being a pacifist, he was a promoter of the policy of Mutually Assured
Destruction and was the founder of the Pugwash movement which used the spectre
of Cold War nuclear annihilation to push for world government. He was a racist
and promoter of population reduction.
He was a
Fabian socialist, and a Multhusian ideologue, along with fellow Coefficients
Club member and one world government promoter H.G. Wells. He was a significant
figure in the agenda to bring about what is now known as the "New World
Order." He was, contrary to the Wikipedia portrayal, a thoroughly evil
man.
Bertrand
Russell wrote about ‘education’ in the 1930’s when he said in his book: ‘The
Scientific Outlook’ published in 1954. Remember Russell was one of the elites
of his day and his books are still praised in academic circles by the same
social class to this day. This must be taken seriously in light of what we see
in our children today as regards ‘education’.
THE
SCIENTIFIC OUTLOOK ~ BERTRAND RUSSELL
CHAPTER
XV
EDUCATION
IN A SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY
EDUCATION
has two purposes:
on
the one hand to form the mind,
on
the other hand to train the citizen.
The
Athenians concentrated on the former, the Spartans on the latter. The Spartans
won, but the Athenians were remembered.
Education in
a scientific society may, I think, be best conceived after the analogy of the
education provided by the Jesuits. The Jesuits provided one sort of education
for the boys who were to become ordinary men of the world and another for those
who were to become members of the Society of Jesus.
In like
manner, the scientific rulers will provide one kind of education for ordinary
men and women, and another for those who are to become holders of scientific
power.
Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented.Of these qualities probably contentment will be considered the most important.
In order to
produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry
will be brought into play. Children will be educated from their earliest years
in the manner which is found least likely to produce complexes.
Almost all
will be normal, happy, healthy boys or girls. Their diet will not be left to
the caprices of parents, but will be such as the best biochemists recommend.
They will spend much time in the open air, and will be given no more
book-learning than is absolutely necessary.
Upon the
temperament so formed, docility will be imposed by the methods of the drill-sergeant,
or perhaps by the softer methods employed upon Boy Scouts. All the boys and
girls will learn from an early age to be what is called “co-operative,” i.e. to
do exactly what everybody is doing.
Initiative
will be discouraged in these children,
and
insubordination, without being punished,
will
be scientifically trained out of them.
Their
education throughout will be in great part manual, and when their school years
come to an end they will be taught a trade. In deciding what trade they are to
adopt, experts will appraise their aptitudes. Formal lessons, insofar as they
exist, will be conducted by means of the cinema or the radio, so that one
teacher can give simultaneous lessons in all the classes throughout a whole
country.
The giving
of these lessons will, of course, be recognized as a highly skilled
undertaking, reserved for the members of the governing class. All that will be
required locally to replace the present-day school teacher will be a lady to
keep order, though it is hoped that the children will be so well-behaved that
they will seldom require this estimable person’s services.
Those children, on the other hand, who are destined to become members of the governing class will have a very different education. They will be selected, some before birth, some during the first three years of life, and a few between the ages of three and six. All the best-known science will be applied to the simultaneous development of intelligence and will-power.
Eugenics,
chemical and thermal treatment of the embryo, and diet in early years will be
used with a view to the production of the highest possible ultimate ability.
The scientific outlook will be instilled from the moment that a child can talk,
and throughout the early impressionable years the child will be carefully
guarded from contact with the ignorant and unscientific.
From infancy
up to twenty-one, scientific knowledge will be poured into him, and at any rate
from the age of twelve upwards he will specialize on those sciences for which
he shows the most aptitude.
At the same
time he will be taught physical toughness ; he will be encouraged to roll naked
in the snow, to fast occasionally for twenty-four hours, to run many miles on
hot days, to be bold in all physical adventures and uncomplaining when he suffers
physical pain.
From the age
of twelve upwards he will be taught to organize children slightly younger than
himself, and will suffer severe censure if groups of such children fail to
follow his lead. A sense of his high destiny will be constantly set before him,
and loyalty towards his order will be so axiomatic that it will never occur to
him to question it. Every youth will thus be subjected to a threefold training:
in intelligence, in self-command, and in command over others.
If he should fail in any one of these three, he will suffer the terrible penalty of degradation to the ranks of common workers, and will be condemned for the rest of his life to associate with men and women vastly inferior to himself in education and probably in intelligence.
The spur of
this fear will suffice to produce industry in all but a very small minority of
boys and girls of the governing class.
Except for the one matter of loyalty to the world State and to their own order, members of the governing class will be encouraged to be adventurous and full of initiative.
It will be
recognized that it is their business to improve scientific technique, and to
keep the manual workers contented by means of continual new amusements. As
those upon whom all progress depends, they must not be unduly tame, nor so
drilled as to be incapable of new ideas.
Unlike the
children destined to be manual workers, they will have personal contact with
their teacher, and will be encouraged to argue with him. It will be his
business to prove himself in the right if he can and, if not, to acknowledge
his error gracefully.
There will, however, be limits to intellectual freedom, even among the children of the governing class.They will not be allowed to question the value of science, or the division of the population into manual workers and experts.They will not be allowed to coquette with the idea that perhaps poetry is as valuable as machinery, or love as good a thing as scientific research.If such ideas do occur to any venturesome spirit, they will be received in a pained silence, and there will be a pretence that they have not been heard.
A profound
sense of public duty will be instilled into boys and girls of the governing
class as soon as they are able to understand such an idea. They will be taught
to feel that mankind depends upon them, and that they owe benevolent service
especially to the less fortunate classes beneath them. But let it not be
supposed that they will be prigs far from it.
They will turn off with a deprecating laugh any too portentous remark that puts into explicit words what they will all believe in their hearts.
Their
manners will be easy and pleasant, and their sense of humour unfailing.
The latest
stage in the education of the most intellectual of the governing class will
consist of training for research. Research will be highly organized, and young
people will not be allowed to choose what particular piece of research they
shall do. They will, of course, be directed to research in those subjects for
which they have shown special ability.
A great deal
of scientific knowledge will be concealed from all but a few. There will be
arcana reserved for a priestly class of researchers, who will be carefully
selected for their combination of brains with loyalty. One may, I think, expect
that research will be much more technical than fundamental.
The men at
the head of any department of research will be elderly, and content to think
that the fundamentals of their subject are sufficiently known. Discoveries
which upset the official view of fundamentals, if they are made by young men,
will incur disfavour, and if rashly published will lead to degradation.
Young men to
whom any fundamental innovation occurs will make cautious attempts to persuade
their professors to view the new ideas with favour, but if these attempts fail
they will conceal their new ideas until they themselves have acquired positions
of authority, by which time they will probably have forgotten them.
The
atmosphere of authority and organization will be extremely favourable to
technical research, but somewhat inimical to such subversive innovations as
have been seen, for example, in physics during the present century. There will
be, of course, an official metaphysic, which will be regarded as intellectually
unimportant but politically sacrosanct.
In the long
run, the rate of scientific progress will diminish, and discovery will be
killed by respect for authority.
As for the manual workers, they will be discouraged from serious thought: they will be made as comfortable as possible, and their hours of work will be much shorter than they are at present; they will have no fear of destitution or of misfortune to their children. As soon as working hours are over, amusements will be provided, of a sort calculated to cause wholesome mirth, and to prevent any thoughts of discontent which otherwise might cloud their happiness.
On those
rare occasions when a boy or girl who has passed the age at which it is usual
to determine social status shows such marked ability as to seem the intellectual
equal of the rulers, a difficult situation will arise, requiring serious
consideration.
If the youth
is content to abandon his previous associates and to throw in his lot
whole-heartedly with the rulers, he may, after suitable tests, be promoted, but
if he shows any regrettable solidarity with his previous associates, the rulers
will reluctantly conclude that there is nothing to be done with him except to
send him to the lethal chamber before his ill-disciplined intelligence has had
time to spread revolt. This will be a painful duty to the rulers, but I think
they will not shrink from performing it.
In normal
cases, children of sufficiently excellent heredity will be admitted to the
governing class from the moment of conception. I start with this moment rather
than with birth, since it is from this moment and not merely from the moment of
birth that the treatment of the two classes will be different.
If, however,
by the time the child reaches the age of three, it is fairly clear that he does
not attain the required standard, he will be degraded at that point.
I assume
that by that time it will be possible to judge of the intelligence of a child
of three with a fair measure of accuracy. Cases in which there is doubt, which
should, however, be few, will be subjected to careful observation up to the age
of six, at which moment one supposes the official decision will be possible
except in a few rare instances.
Conversely,
children born of manual workers may be promoted at any moment between the age
of three and six, but only in quite rare instances at later ages. I think it
may be assumed, however, that there would be a very strong tendency for the
governing class to become hereditary, and that after a few generations not many
children would be moved from either class into the other.
This is
especially likely to be the case if embryological methods of improving the
breed are applied to the governing class, but not to the others.
In this way the gulf between the two classes as regards native intelligence may become continually wider and wider.
This will
not lead to the abolition of the less intelligent class, since the rulers will
not wish to undertake uninteresting manual work, or to be deprived of the
opportunity for exercising benevolence and public spirit which they derive from
the management of the manual workers.
HOW RUSSELL LAID DOWN THE
METHODOLOGIES FOR CREATING THE NEW "SCIENCE DICTATORSHIP" IN SUPPORT
OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER.
(He was relying on the plebs, as he calls us, not
being able to read!)
I think the subject which will be of most
importance politically is mass psychology ... Its importance has been
enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these
the most influential is what is called 'education.' Religion plays a part,
though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an
increasing part ... It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to
persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided
by the State with money and equipment.
The subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship.
The subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship.
The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black.
Various results will soon be arrived at.
First, that the influence of home is obstructive.Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten.Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective.Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity.
But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims
precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children
believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them
believe it is dark gray.
Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated.
Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated.
When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.
Pages 49-50
Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy.
It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give
governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even
in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at
destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be
incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise
than as their schoolmasters would have wished.
Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.
The Nazis were more scientific than the present
rulers of Russia ... If they had survived, they would probably have soon taken
to scientific breeding. Any nation which adopts this practice will, within a
generation, secure great military advantages.
The system, one may surmise, will be something like this: except possibly in the governing aristocracy, all but 5 per cent of males and 30 per cent of females will be sterilised.The 30 per cent of females will be expected to spend the years from eighteen to forty in reproduction, in order to secure adequate cannon fodder.
As a rule, artificial insemination will be preferred
to the natural method.
Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organised insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.
Page 54
After all, most civilised and semi-civilised countries known to history and had a large class of slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their owners.
There is nothing in human nature that makes the
persistence of such a system impossible. And the whole development of
scientific technique has made it easier than it used to be to maintain a
despotic rule of a minority.
When the government controls the distribution of
food, its power is absolute so long as they can count on the police and the
armed forces. And their loyalty can be secured by giving them some of the
privileges of the governing class.
I do not see how any internal movement of revolt
can ever bring freedom to the oppressed in a modern scientific dictatorship.
Pages 103-104
I do not pretend that birth control is the only way
in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one
must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a
moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps
bacteriological war may prove more effective.
If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full.
There would be nothing in this to offend the
consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions of nationalists. The
state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that?
Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s.
However, I am wandering from the question of
stability, to which I must return.
There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population.
There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population.
The first is that of birth control,the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, andthe third that of general misery except for a powerful minority.
All these methods have been practiced: the first,
for example, by the Australian aborigines; the second by the Aztecs, the
Spartans, and the rulers of Plato’s Republic; the third in the world as some
Western internationalists hope to make it and in Soviet Russia.
Of these three, only birth control avoids extreme
cruelty and unhappiness for the majority of human beings. Meanwhile, so long as
there is not a single world government there will be competition for power
among the different nations. And as increase of population brings the threat of
famine, national power will become more and more obviously the only way of
avoiding starvation. There will therefore be blocs in which the hungry nations
band together against those that are well fed. That is the explanation of the
victory of communism in China.
Page 105
The need for a world government, if the population
problem is to be solved in any humane manner, is completely evident on
Darwinian principles.
Page 110
A society is not stable unless it is on the whole satisfactory to the holders of power and the holders of power are not exposed to the risk of successful revolution.
Pages 110-111
First, as regards
physical conditions. Soil and raw materials must not be used up so fast that
scientific progress cannot continually make good the loss by means of new
inventions and discoveries. If raw materials are not to be used up too fast,
there must not be free competition for their acquisition and use but an
international authority to ration them in ~ such quantities as may from time to
time seem compatible with continued industrial prosperity. And similar
considerations apply to soil conservation.
Second, as regards population ... To deal with this problem it will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilences, and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishment of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling.
Second, as regards population ... To deal with this problem it will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilences, and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishment of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling.
Bertrand Russell then came out with the following statements on Palestine and Israel within days of his death. No, he did not grow a conscience but his words are important and, in this rare instance, almost humanitarian. Notice... "almost".
SOURCES:
RELATED:
Thats a pretty awful analysis of a great man. While I agree with a lot of the New World order and feel enlightened by the Zionist stuff on this site, the attach on BERTRAND RUSSELL makes me question what I read here.
ReplyDeleteWhat Mr Anon? I am not exactly in agreement myself with Noor on all issues (not least religion) however your comment 'a pretty awful analysis of a great man' just stinks of being a Troll like attack. Bertrand Russell was part of the Russell family bloodline - a leading occult family (no not everyone with the name Russell - I know). So sorry but Noor is correct about that. Did Bertrand Russell further the One World Agenda? Yes. So again Noor is correct about that too. Please Mr. Anon can you either explain yourself better or just leave.
DeletePlease realize that the man was of the enemy and he voiced reprehensible ideas for the common person. He pushed the NWO/JWO mercilessly and was fully in favour of the soulless life for the average slave. Now, to me, that is just plain evil. Please understand, you can say lots of great things, but beneath it all can be a hidden layer of pure evil.
DeleteWow! Very detailed and very useful. Russell was one of the arrogant rich elite. He was a fascist.
ReplyDeleteCheers
Aangirfan
Well,to hell with that pathetic Malthusian dishrag Russell,and that's here he lives now!! Russell admits to having no use for God, but little did he know that God had no use for him, except as a fuel source for heating the homes of the fallen angels...Sorry that my daughter has a bit of the Russell bloodline through an unfortunate marriage, but the Lord has taken care of that now and the curse is broken -
ReplyDelete