Wednesday 7 April 2010


This fine rabbi waves the Cabalistic Sign of Satan at the camera as he shouts his love to the world.

By Anait Brutian
April 1, 2010

To the writer of this original piece I owe an apology. When I sat down to post, suddenly the piece took on a life of its own and has ended up as it is now. The same but with a lot more added in both references and images and a few thoughts. Please, dear readers, learn more about this rabid branch of Judaism, the Chabad Lubavitch, those holy looking Rabbi who hide their crimes behind a demeanor of piousness that is based on fanaticism and the black magic of the Kabala, the Babylonian Talmud, and pure unadulterated hatred. The images provided will show you just some of their "escapades" in the past year or two.

Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira, the prominent right-wing spiritual leader in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, has openly condoned Jews killing any non-Jews, including children and babies, who pose a threat to Israel.

These Rabbis are all members of the Chabad Lubavitch, a fanatic Jewish sect that is very dangerous to all who are not Chabad themselves. We see these men meeting with our world leaders, their photos taken with every leader in the world, crowding about the politician in massive groups, their black hats, long beards, infiltrating into our governments as well by shaving and working from within. They do not mean well for us, the gentiles who walk the planet.

A group of real estate thieves, money launderers and body part brokers arrested in the summer of 2009 in New Jersey. This opened the door to discover large body brokering business on an international scale.

Shapira, the fanatical Zionist rabbi, who heads the Old Yosef Chai Yeshiva in the illegal settlement of Yitzhar, near Nablus and rabbi Yossi Elitzur have penned a new book: Torah HaMelech (The King's Torah) that has become the subject of the news in Eretz Yisrael (Hebrew for Land of Israel)

The warmongering Shapira asserts:
"If a gentile endangers the existence of Israel, it is allowed to kill him. Also if he is completely not to blame for the situation that has been created." He might have well said that a genocide of all non-Jews along Holocaust lines is kosher too.
But Rabbi Yitzhak Maniac does not stop there. Just breaking any of the Commandments put forth by Moses is grounds for holy murder. Strange how he skipped the whole "Thou Shalt Not Kill" section.

Back in 1996, a group of leading neoconservatives led by Richard Perle drafted a memorandum for then (as now) Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, recommending that Israel adopt a more aggressive and assertive policy towards its neighbors. They called it a “Clean Break” to suggest that it would be a major shift in policy. Today, as American foreign policy looks more like a shipwreck than a victory lap, there is perhaps a need for a Clean Break by Washington. As the relationship with Tel Aviv has an impact far beyond Israel’s size and importance it should, ironically, be the first element in the foreign policy disaster that is examined.

Many Americans who indulge in the mainstream media believe that Israel is a close friend and ally to the United States and that when it is criticized the complaints are often unfair and might even in some cases be motivated by anti-Semitism. Some Americans, mostly evangelical Christians, actually believe that Israel is a special nation either because it is the homeland of the Jewish people or anointed by God and that all other nations of the world should defer to it and protect it. Still other Americans realize that Israel is a nation with good and bad aspects but are intent on using American power and wealth to nurture it because they share either ethnic or religious ties with it.

Some Americans look beyond the bumper sticker definitions to recognize that Israel is indeed like many other countries in most respects but that it is also a special nation in that it has as its protector the most powerful and wealthiest nation on earth. Some think that role to be appropriate because the US has an obligation to guarantee Israeli security, while others would disagree. Those who disagree frequently do so because they find the Israeli influence over the United States to be a dark force, sometimes leading Washington and its elected officials to endorse policies that do not serve the interests of the American people. They would cite examples like the Iraq War, in which supporters of Israel played an enabling role, as well as the ongoing agitation to attack Iran, which would be a replay of Iraq only much much worse.

That Israel is able to control many aspects of America’s relationship with foreign nations is clear and the hubristic Israel Lobby makes virtually no effort to hide what it is doing. On January 18th, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee wrote a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton calling on the United States to veto any resolution in the United Nations condemning the Israeli settlements policy. The settlements are illegal under international law and the pending resolution in the UN carefully uses the precise language previously employed by US administrations to criticize their expansion in an attempt to create an acceptable document and avoid a veto, but the result is not good enough for Gillibrand. Joined by 15 other senators as cosignatories, Gillibrand maintains fatuously and falsely that any criticism of the settlements “hurts the prospects for a peace agreement and is not in the interest of the United States.” In reality, as she well knows, it is US acquiescence in the settlements that damages the US standing in the world.

The past ten days has also provided several other examples of how Israel exerts a strongly negative influence on American foreign policy. President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address urged support for democratic forces in Tunisia. But he did not provide similar support for the democratic forces in Egypt and for the new government in Lebanon, which are both nations currently experiencing political unrest. Why? Because both are frontline states with Israel, meaning that Washington can only consider its relationship to them in terms of whether their political developments are good for Israel or not. This has been excruciatingly clear in the numerous comments by US government spokesmen relating to developments in Cairo: Israel is almost invariably mentioned. The United States prefers to give Cairo billions in aid and covertly support the dictatorial rule of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak because Egypt has kept the peace with Israel. Washington will likewise oppose any government in Lebanon that is beholden to Hezbollah, even if it does not threaten the US or American interests in any way, because Hezbollah is the enemy of Israel.

Looking at the Middle East region objectively, one has to question Washington’s actions. The US national interest is to have a peaceful resolution of the Israel-Palestine conflict, which would require an end to the Israeli settlement policy. It also mandates non-hostile relations with Lebanon and Egypt, nothing more. The Suez Canal is the only asset controlled by Egypt that has international significance and it is in Cairo’s interest, no matter what kind of government it has, to keep it open and bringing in revenue. Egypt, Palestine, and Lebanon produce nothing that the US needs to have and they are not important markets for American goods. None of them threatens any genuine American vital interest.

In another related development, last Wednesday newly elected senator Rand Paul said that he favors ending all foreign aid, including the aid given to Israel and Egypt, because the United States can no longer afford it. Rather than encouraging anyone to debate the issue on its merits, the Israel Lobby, Democratic politicians, and a representative from Paul’s own Republican Party immediately attacked him, saying the proposal was unthinkable. Well, think again. Israel gets billions of dollars yearly from the US for no good reason beyond its ability to manipulate Congress and the media. Paul’s opening the door to a serious discussion about ending that subsidy is long overdue.
Senator Gillibrand’s excursion into fantasy, Rand Paul’s experience in opening Pandora’s box, and the developing situation in Egypt together illustrate how Israel is a United States national security liability and always has been. The relationship narrows the options that US policymakers can pursue in dealing with problems relating to the Muslim world. Arguments that Israeli and American foreign policies are and need to be identical based on shared opposition to international terrorism and other such “values” are fallacious and are based on constructs that are essentially false.
Israel’s bad relationship with its Muslim neighbors has led to frequent wars and more limited military actions since the founding of the country. In a normal world, the onus would be on Israel to establish a modus vivendi with its neighbors, but it has regularly chosen to use the mailed fist as its first option. Since it is a small country lacking in resources, it has only been able to accomplish this by seeking out what might be described as a force multiplier. To that end it has opted to use its powerful lobby to shift US policy in its favor, relying on America as a source of funds and both political and military protection. Its leading politicians have even bragged about how the United States does its bidding. This has done extreme damage to the United States, which has initiated at least one war as a result, and has been engaged in what must be described as a nearly continuous and escalating conflict with the entire Muslim world on behalf of Israel. This has trashed America’s reputation and has come at a real cost of trillions of dollars and thousands of lives. The benefit to the American people has been zero.

In accomplishing its strategic objective of making the United States its permanent protector, Israel and its lobby have also corrupted both Congress and the White House and have created a permanent distortion in how Washington sees the world and responds to it. Israel’s enemies, even if they do not threaten the United States in any way, have become America’s enemies. This has made the US in the eyes of much of the world the enabler of Israeli actions and has in turn made Americans the targets of international terrorism. Osama bin Laden was very clear on the subject, stating that the United States is a partner in the Israeli oppression of the Palestinians. The Israel relationship is a recruiting tool for those who seek to do harm to the United States. Without the Israeli nexus, there would have been no 9/11 and there would be no hysteria about the danger from terrorists driving growth in government and the development of the anti-libertarian security state.

And the relationship is expensive. Israel seeks to militarily dominate its neighbors. It does so with American-provided weapons and maintains its edge through US coproduction agreements that essentially fund jobs in Israeli defense industries that compete directly with US companies that sell the same products. Even though Israel is one of the richest countries in the world, Washington gives it a vast array of advanced weaponry for free and also hands to it the technologies that enable it to eliminate American jobs. As Israeli companies can bid on defense contracts just as if they were American companies, they frequently also wind up getting the work that would go to Americans. Because of the high level of American direct aid plus unique tax breaks for American citizens who give money to Israel, Israelis have free medical care and university education, benefits that few Americans enjoy.

And, finally, Israel is not afraid to bite the hand that feeds it. It is annually rated by the FBI as the “friendly” country that is most aggressive in spying to obtain US defense secrets and advanced technology. The mainstream media is complicit in not featuring stories that relate to Israeli espionage, but the cases number in the hundreds. Several spies who have been caught in the act have received a slap on the wrist instead of real punishment. One, Ben-Ami Kadish, was even able to continue to receive his government pension after stealing and passing on defense secrets.

Now I will be the first to admit that my narrative presented above reveals my own biases in that I am appalled at what Israel and its supporters have done to my country. But I have to believe that by any objective standard, the relationship with Israel does nothing good for the United States and does, instead, a great deal of damage. That leading policymakers are afraid to challenge the billions of dollars flowing to Tel Aviv while US senators line up to sign on to a letter that opposes their own country’s interests is a tragedy of epic proportions. That Washington will define its own interests in the Middle East largely in terms of whether they are compatible with those of Israel is nothing short of betrayal of the Constitution, which established a national government that would benefit the American people and make them both safe and prosperous. One hesitates to borrow rhetoric from the neoconservatives, but sometimes even they get something right. It is indeed time for a clean break, but this time with Israel.

Nice sneer from this mad hateful creature who has a power he certainly does not deserve. Remove the beard and you would see just another punk/criminal.

The book contains no less than
"230 pages on the laws concerning the killing of non-Jews, a kind of guide for anyone who ponders the question of if and when it is permissible to take the life of a non-Jew"
The book follows the halachic laws (the collective body of Jewish religious law, including the 613 biblical laws) for the killing of the goyim (Hebrew for nations), who threaten Eretz Yisrael

"Jews have the right to kill non-Jews in just about any circumstance."

"If we kill a gentile who has sinned or violated one of the seven commandments … there is nothing wrong with the murder"

(the seven Noachian Laws), which, according to the Talmud, should be followed by all mankind (6); (see The Noachian Laws in Jewish Encyclopedia (7).

"When we approach a non-Jew who has violated the seven Noachian laws and kill him out of concern for upholding these seven laws, no prohibition has been violated"


Lieberman is Chabad, as is his cousin, the hate-filled Avignor Lieberman.

The Yeshiva World News official website justifies the book's permission to kill with the following statement: "
The book adds that killing a non-Jew who has violated the Seven Commandments given to non-Jews because we care about Torah and mitzvos, then this is acceptable. It stresses the importance of Eretz Yisrael, the halachic requirements of the land, and living within a Torah framework"
Similarly, the book justifies the killing of "non-Jews who demand the land for themselves
"Civilians are not immune from Shapira's and Elitzur's attacks: "Any case in which the life of the civilian endangers Israel ~ it is allowed to kill a gentile."
This authorization applies to direct and indirect
"endangering" of Israel. Thus civilians who aid fighters, support the war, or sympathize with the resistance should be killed.
The Rabbis also encourage the killing of non-Jews that bear Israeli citizenship but are suspected of assisting organizations that are considered a "threat to national security" by the present regime.
According to Shapira and Elitzur, babies and children can be killed too because they are "hindrances."
"Hindrances ~ babies are found many times in this situation. They block the way to rescue by their presence and do so completely by force. Nevertheless, they may be killed because their presence aids murder. There is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults."

Another "hindrance" properly dealt with according to the Mad Rabbis' beliefs.

"The children of the leader may be harmed in order to apply pressure to him. If attacking the children of a wicked ruler will influence him not to behave wickedly, they may be harmed"

Shapira writes that
"Children should not be exempt from this fate. There is a reasonable explanation for killing infants if it is clear that they will grow up to hurt us, and in this situation, the strike should be directed at them.”

Now do readers understand the death toll in the 2008-08 Palestinian Holocaust? This is the true mindset that was pumped into the young people of the army of Zionist/Marxist/Racist Israel!

Jewish settlers cut a Palestinian boy's arm off for throwing stones. This also is, according to Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro, a permitted act under Jewish Law and Jewish "religion".
Seriously? This kind of moral delusions justifying infanticide aren't even worth a retort. What they are worth is a direct, unequivocal condemnation by the Israeli state and all international bodies, from the United Nations to Amnesty International to the Red Cross and beyond.

Rabbi Maniac should be put behind bars and never allowed to speak or write, ever, unless he recants. Doing so would be less an act of censorship than a service to humanity.

The conclusion of the book contains the following statement:
"In religious law, we have found that non-Jews are generally suspected of shedding Jewish blood, and in war, this suspicion becomes a great deal stronger. One must consider killing even babies, who have not violated the seven Noachian laws, because of the future danger that will be caused if they are allowed to grow up to be as wicked as their parents" (14).
Encouraging retaliation, Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur support violence and give credence to the notion that:
"In order to defeat the enemy … [they] must behave toward … [the enemy] in a spirit of retaliation and measure for measure."
"Retaliation is absolutely necessary in order to render such wickedness not worthwhile. Therefore, sometimes we do cruel deeds in order to create the proper balance of terror" (15).
The idea of using terror fits with Israel Koenig's recommendation in "The Koenig Memorandum" ~
"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population" (16)
It also fits with Rafael Eitan's prescription for the removal of Palestinians from Palestine:
"We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimetre of Eretz Israel [the land of Israel] … Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours" (17).
A similar sentiment was expressed by the co-signer of the document called The Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel (18) and future Prime Minister of Israel David Ben Gurion: "We must expel Arabs and take their places" (19).
Michael Chertoff comes from an old, highly placed Chabad family. Now how on earth can he put America first? Barack, of course. Below, Traitor Bush signing the Noahide Laws into the American Legal System.
Yoram Bar Porath supported these views:
"It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands" (20).
Vladimir Jabotinsky, the founder of Revisionist Zionism, had expressed similar views long before the establishment of the State of Israel:
"If you wish to colonize a land in which people are already living, you must provide a garrison for the land … or else, give up your colonization, for without an armed force which will render physically impossible any attempt to destroy or prevent this colonization, colonization is impossible, not difficult, not dangerous, but IMPOSSIBLE! Zionism is a colonization adventure and therefore it stands or falls by the question of armed force[s]"(21).
The statements by Israel Koenig, Rafael Eitan, David Ben Gurion, Yoram Bar Porath and Vladimir Jabotinsky bear all the trappings of a jihad against the Palestinians. Commonly translated as Holy War, the Arabic word literally means "striving," "struggling," "endeavouring" (22).
Webster's English Encyclopaedic Unabridged Dictionary defines it as
1) "a holy war undertaken as a sacred duty by Muslims"
2) "any vigorous, often bitter crusade for an idea or principle" (23).
The on-line version of the same dictionary identifies it as a noun, provides a variant (Jehad), the etymology (Arabic jihād) but maintains the same definitions (24).
T. P. Hughes explains that there are two kinds of jihads ~ "the greater" against one's own lusts and "the lesser" against infidels (25).

Kill the little beast Officer. He looks at you and does not cringe before your weapon.
According to Hughes, the description of the "lesser jihad" occurs in al-Madinah Surahs (an Islamic term denoting a chapter in the Qur'an), written after Muhammad established his supreme rule and was able to dictate his terms and conditions to his enemies (26).
Historically, this type of jihad can be viewed as a way of advancing Islam among the conquered unbelievers offering them three choices
(1) "the reception of Islam, in which case the conquered became enfranchised citizens of the Muslim state;
(2) "the payment of a poll-tax (Jizyah), by which unbelievers in Islam obtain protection, and become Zimmis …" and
(3) "death by sword, to those who will not pay the poll-tax"(27).
Bob Dylan? Well with a last name like Zimmerman, one can be nothing but Jewish. I do not say Bob is of the ilk presented in here, I just include his photo to show how deeply they reach. Bob could be of that 1% who actually care. He does, however, have a deep history of work in the Cabala and the Jewish aspect of Masonry.

Unlike its Islamic counterpart, the Zionist jihad does not differentiate between "greater" and "lesser" types and terror is not used as a last resort, as was the case with the last option in the al-Madinah Surahs of the Qur'an. Terror is part and parcel of all Zionist undertakings. The notion not only justifies the senseless killing of civilians, including women, children and the elderly, but also promotes it. 

Israel's former chief rabbi, Mordechai Elyahu encouraged the Israeli army to mass murder Palestinians in 2007:
"If they don't stop after we kill 100, then we must kill 1,000. And if they don't stop after 1,000, then we must kill 10,000. If they still don't stop we must kill 100,000. Even a million."

Manis Friedman blew his international reputation as a kindly good loving man when he flat out spoke of his feelings on war and goyim. Manis is also responsible for bringing Dylan back into the fold with promises of love, most likely many of them deceitful.
A similar feeling is expressed in June 2009, by US Hasidic Rabbi Manis Friedman, who encouraged Israelis to kill Palestinian
"men, women and children." "I don't believe in Western morality, i.e., don't kill civilians or children, don't destroy holy sites, don't fight during the holiday seasons, don't bomb cemeteries, and don't shoot until they shoot first because it is immoral. The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children (and cattle)" (28).
According to Maariv, Shapira's and Elitzur's Torah HaMelech does not mention Palestinians or Arabs; the "killing of gentiles" is a "theoretical concept," supposedly unrelated to the politics of the region ~ "he [Shapira] was 'careful not to explicitly encourage private individuals to take the law into their own hands" (29)
The Yeshiva World News official website stresses the fact that while "the media is having a field day with the sefer, it is written that the sefer discusses theoretic halachic principles, and in no way calls for the murder of goyim,"Arabs" or "Palestinians" as the media seeks to imply"(30).
Nice try to cover the collective Settlement bottom, but no one is buying excuses when the truth is so obvious in the actions of the Settlers and so many Israelis. These men believe in the genocide of the Palestinians because that is what we are really talking about here.

This may be so, but Torah HaMelech, the new halachic guide for the Zionist jihad is popular among several prominent rabbis, who recommended it to their followers and students. The Yeshiva World News official website enlists approbation from Rabbi Dov Lior, Rabbi Yaakov Yosef, and Rabbi Yitzchak Ginsburgh (31).

In 2003, under pressure from left-wing groups, Attorney-General Elyakim Rubinstein charged Rabbi Yitzchak Ginzburgh, the former head of the Old Yosef Chai Yeshiva in Shechem, with incitement to racism. Rabbi Ginsburgh's June 19, 1989 statement clearly declares:
"Jewish blood and a goy's (gentile's) blood are not the same." Thus, killing isn't murder if the victim is Gentile. (32).
According to Rabbi Ginsburgh
"… every single cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, and is thus part of God." If this is so, "then every strand of DNA is a part of God. Therefore, something is special about Jewish DNA."
Using similar logic, Rabbi Ginsburg declared that
"the Arabs … don't have the right to live in … [Israel] and that "they want to take land that doesn't belong to them and therefore they are also robbers."
"The concept of the third world, which is the most primiti on the scale of nations, refers to the Arabs who are on the lowest rung in the scale … According to Kabbalah, the Jewish people are the most advanced people in mind and spirit, but Yishmael is a nation of slaves and the character of a slave is licentious and undisciplined" (33).
Approbation from a brilliant "haematologist" and "DNA specialist" Rabbi Ginsburgh speaks volumes, especially when considering the fact that Ginsburgh's own sentiments concerning the killing of non-Jews do not differ from those of Shapira and Elitzur ~
Ginsburgh justified the US-born Baruch Goldstein's 1994 killing of the Palestinian worshipers in the Machpela Cave mosque in Hebron during Ramadan on halachic grounds (34).

Rabbi Dov Lior (black hat) preparing to circumcise an infant boy. Lior is more than just a tad fanatic.
Another religious leader, Rabbi Dov Lior, the chairman of the Yesha rabbinical council, chief rabbi of Kiryat Arba (35) that has endorsed Shapira's and Elitzur's new halachic guide for the Zionist jihad is an "expert" on military matters:
"There is no such thing as enemy civilians in war time. The law of our Torah is to have mercy on our soldiers and to save them … A thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew's fingernail" (36).
A student of Rabbi Tzvi Yehuda Kook, the founder of the extremist Gush Emunim with the slogan "The Land of Israel, for the people of Israel, according to the Torah of Israel," Rabbi Dov Lior continues to sponsor the teachings of his mentor Rabbi Tzvi Yehuda Kook and the latter's father, fundamentalist Rabbi Abraham Kook , the founder of the first Zionist Yeshiva in Jerusalem in 1924, during the British Mandate, who said: "The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews ~ all of them in all different levels ~ is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle" (37)

In late 1980s, following a public protest over his suggestions to use captured Arab terrorists "to conduct medical experiments," Rabbi Lior was barred from the election to the Supreme Rabbinical Council (38)

More recently, Rabbi Dov Lior issued a halachic decree, which states that "it is forbidden by Jewish law to employ Arabs or rent homes to them" (39)

In an interview published by "Eretz Israel Shelanu" (Our Land of Israel), Rabbi Lior said: "since this is a matter of endangering souls, it is clear that it is completely forbidden to employ them and rent houses to them in Israel. Their employment is forbidden ~ not only at yeshivas ~ but at factories, hotels and everywhere" (40).

Rabbi Yaakov Yosef, the head of the Hazon Yaakov Yeshiva in Jerusalem and the son of Shas' spiritual leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef (41) is another supporter of Yitzhak Shapira's and Yossi Elitzur's new halachic guide for the Zionist jihad. He is a member of the national-religious community and has served as a Shas MK in the past (42).
The fact that Shapira and Elitzur began selling Torah HaMelech at the memorial for Rabbi Meir Kahane, the Israeli Knesset member who advocated "mass expulsion of Palestinians from Israel and the territories" (43) is significant.

It implies that even though it is not distributed by the leading book-sellers (44), Shapira's and Elitzur's sefer is known among past and present members of the Israeli Knesset, suggesting that the halachic guide for the Zionist jihad is tacitly promoted at the highest level of the government.
The statement that Rabbi Shapira's and Rabbi Elitzur's halachic guide for the Zionist jihad does not target Palestinians or Arabs and approaches the "killing of gentiles" from a "theoretical" perspective is more worrisome than one might suspect. It can be interpreted as a license to kill all gentiles that fit into the authors' category of the "goyim who threaten Eretz Yisrael."
But the category can be broadened to include all who oppose Israel's Zionist agenda in the occupied territories, conveniently branded as anti-Semites by the Zionist-controlled media (see What is Anti-Semitism? by the same author.(45)
And finally, the category can be broadened to include all opposition to the Zionist programme of world domination:
"We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent."
(Jewish Banker Paul Warburg's testimony before the U.S. Senate, February 17, 1950 (46); Paul Warburg, the founder of the US Federal Reserve, was the brother of Max Warburg, the chief of German Intelligence and an associate of Adolf Hitler ~ both were executives of I.G. Farben). 

Not THAT is an interesting fact! I.G. Farben made significant financial gains from the work camps they helped create and supply with various things, including chemicals, allegedly to keep the Nazi killing machine going. Yet now we find that he was Jewish, not German?

Whether these categories were delineated or not is secondary to the fact that Shapira's and Elitzur's sefer was sold at Mercaz Harav Yeshiva, the flagship of Orthodox Zionism. According to Mathew Wagner of The Jerusalem Post, there was a small sign at the entrance advertising the sale of Torah HaMelech at NIS 30 and "those interested in buying the book were asked to place money in a small cup and take … [a copy]" (47).
A young man called Lior, whose name and phone number had appeared on the advertisement, was surprised to realize how fast the copies were sold. The authors and promoters of the halachic guide for the Zionist jihad could not have chosen a better location for the sale ~ Torah HaMelech is especially useful for the students of the yeshiva "who have served, are presently serving or plan on serving in the IDF" (48).

The Canadian Prime Minister Harper who is rapidly selling our country to the laws and will of these madmen. May he find peace in their Talmudic hell for what he does to a wonderful nation.
Mathew Wagner further explains that since
"a large portion of Torat Hamelech is dedicated to exploring Jewish "rules of engagement" according to the authors' interpretation of Jewish law," the book is relevant "for many young men at Mercaz Harav or other Orthodox Zionist yeshivot where IDF service is combined with intense Torah learning" (49).
The fact that "the book could have practical implications for how religious soldiers do battle" (50) is of no consequence to Rabbi Zalman Nechemia Goldberg, who is "a highly respected halachic authority in both haredi and religious Zionist circles". His endorsement appeared in the book.
As Rabbi Shapira's and Rabbi Elitzur's halachic guide will undeniably incite more violence against non-Jews, it will also contribute to the rift between Jews and Gentiles.
The Zionist intellectual Maurice Samuel, in his You Gentiles of 1924 polarized the gentile and the Jewish worlds:
"There are two life-forces in the world I know: Jewish and gentile, ours and yours. Your outlooks on life, your dominant reactions, are the same to-day as they were two thousand years ago. All that has changed is the instrument of expression. You live the same life under different faiths, but something clings to you here and there resembling the original form of the faith we gave you"(51).
Samuel admits that the "surface credo of a Jewish faith" imposed on a gentile way of life did not make a fundamental difference: "But in the end your true nature works itself into the pattern of the borrowed faith, and expresses itself undeniably" (52)

Samuel suggests that there is a "clear and fateful division of life ~ Jewish and gentile," with an "unsounded abyss between" them. Gentiles have a "way of living and thinking" that is distinctly different from Jews: "I do not believe that this primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable. You and we may come to an understanding, never to reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever." (53).

Similar to other Zionists, Samuel's "solution" is based on the destruction of the existing world order:
"A century of partial tolerance gave us Jews access to your world. In that period the great attempt was made, by advance guards of reconciliation, to bring our two worlds together. It was a century of failure. We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build"(54).
The separation between Jews and non-Jews lies at the heart of the teachings of Zionist intellectuals and religious leaders. This teaching is encouraged even outside of Israel. Elliot Abrams, a neo-conservative in charge of President Bush's "global democracy strategy," wrote in 1997 that "[Jewish law] does indeed separate Jews from their fellow citizens" and that "Jews are in a permanent covenant with God and with the land of Israel and its people" (55).

I have sometimes wondered if this separation imposed by the Rabbis, ghettos, the Wall, etc is also to keep the Jewish people themselves from learning more about the workings of the world, meeting goyim, and realizing that we are all just human beings. It tends to keep the Jewish people in their thrall most definitely.

This laughing lad, maniacal at best, was one of several hundred Chabad males who spat on an American female journalist last year. They cornered her and all spat upon her with curses.
The sentiment of irreconcilable differences is enforced in the following statement, this time with overt shades of racial superiority:
"We Jews regard our race as superior to all humanity, and look forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them."
Rabbi Saadya Grama's 2003 book Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut (The Majesty of Israel and the Question of the Diaspora) provides a race-based theory of Jewish supremacy arguing that non-Jews are "completely evil," while Jews are genetically superior: "The difference between the people of Israel and the nations of the world is an essential one. The Jew by his source and in his very essence is entirely good. The goy, by his source and in his very essence is completely evil. This is not simply a matter of religious distinction, but rather of two completely different species" (56).
This attitude towards the goyim is reinforced by the statement of Golda Maier on March 8, 1969. Her declaration: "How can we return the occupied territories? There is nobody to return them to" (57) is a clever pun suggesting that the original inhabitants of Palestine are "nobody" i.e., not people.
The look of love from a man you would like your daughter to marry?

Apart from its inherent falsehood (see the statements by Israel Koenig, Rafael Eitan, David Ben Gurion, Yoram Bar Porath, Vladimir Jabotinsky above), Golda Maier's derogatory remark downplays the danger posed to Israel by the original inhabitants: a "nobody" surely does not threaten the security of Eretz Yisrael.

If there is no real danger to threaten Eretz Yisrael, then Rabbi Shapira's and Rabbi Elitzur's halachic guide for the killing of the goyim is founded on the principle of HATRED ~ a sentiment shared by Israel Koenig, Rafael Eitan, David Ben Gurion, Yoram Bar Porath, Vladimir Jabotinsky, Maurice Samuel, Paul Warburg , Rabbi Abraham Kook, Rabbi Tzvi Yehuda Kook, Rabbi Meir Kahane, Rabbi Saadya Grama, Rabbi Yitzchak Ginsburgh, Rabbi Dov Lior, Rabbi Yaakov Yosef, Rabbi Mordechai Elyahu, Rabbi Manis Friedman, Rabbi Zalman Nechemia Goldberg, whose statements demonstrate similar hatred for the goyim.

According to Roee Sharon, Shapira's and Elitzur's halachic guide for the Zionist jihad includes "hundreds of sources from the Bible and religious law" (58).

Indeed, the Bible demands separation, segregation and discrimination. After restating his "abhorrence" (Lev 20:23) towards the previous inhabitants of the land and his reasons for driving them out, God promises their land "flowing with milk and honey" ~ a clear reference to Exodus 33:3 ~ to his people declaring: "I am the Lord your God; I have separated you from the peoples" (Lev 20:24).
Ezra marks this separation with his famous term "the holy seed" (Ezra 9:2), "zera hakodesh" in Hebrew (59), which compels the entire community to dissolve all inter-marriages, getting rid of foreign wives and their children (Ezra 10:3). The ideology of separation, segregation and discrimination combined with the toxic rhetoric of the fundamentalists yields a dangerous brew made up of insanity and criminality. Mathew Wagner discusses the critical response of a "leading religious Zionist media figure" (60).
Rabbi Rosenbaum. Have you stolen and/or sold any illegal body parts on the international market lately?
One may take a sigh of relief in thinking that the criticism is based on a sound evaluation of the dangers associated with endorsing radical jihadist ideology. Alas, this is not the case ~ the anonymous "leading religious Zionist media figure" is NOT concerned with the moral imperative of such indoctrination, in fact he agrees with the conclusions of Shapira's and Elitzur's halachic guide: "I do not doubt the halachic conclusions of the book" (61).
He is concerned with the negative publicity the book generated:
"I grabbed my head when I saw the headline in Ma'ariv. I said to myself we have just managed to contain the media damage done to us by Teitel, by showing he is an isolated element, and now this happens" (62).
Thus, while the civilized world is screaming about Shapira's an
Thus, while the civilized world is screaming about Shapira's and Elitzur's sefer Torah HaMelech, the reaction towards the new Halachic Guide is positive in Israel. No one seems to worry about the fact that it will definitely lead to more violence. The "leading religious Zionist media figure" epitomizes the Zionist mentality: the life of the goyim is less important than the media damage caused by the publication of Shapira's and Elitzur's halachic guide for the Zionist jihad.

Chabad IDF beseeching their God to send many kills (Arab women, children and animals) across their path.
One student of the Od Yosef Hai yeshiva in Yitzhar explained, from his point of view, where Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur got the courage to speak so freely on a subject such as the killing of non-Jews.

"The rabbis aren't afraid of prosecution because in that case, Maimonides [Rabbi Moses ben Maimon, 1135–1204] and Nahmanides [Rabbi Moses ben Nahman, 1194–1270] would have to stand trial too, and anyway, this is research on religious law," the yeshiva student said. "In a Jewish state, nobody sits in jail for studying Torah.

The scariest part of all is that Rabbi Maniac isn't the driver of this overtly racist, malevolent and violent religious beliefs, according to the

He is just the leading mouthpiece of the radical Jews who are settling in the West Bank, where he runs a school in Yitzhar, one of the territory’s most hardline settlements, near Nablus.

American Jewish settler funders support Od Yosef Hai Yeshiva in Yitzhar?
If so, that means American tax dollars are subsidizing this racist genocidal filth.
Not to mention the Israeli state itself which implicitly endorses Shapria's murderous hatred by providing a $300,000 state subsidy for his yeshiva.

The yeshiva is, by the way, a legally registered UK charity.
Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira has knowingly creating a retaliatory cycle of violence beyond the "eye for an eye" doctrine of the Torah. If this current event is allowed to develop, there will be no future for non-Jews and Jews alike.

Poor lad. The hockey team he wagered on lost!
1), (30), (31) Rav Yitzchak Shapira's Sefer Makes Headlines in Eretz Yisrael

(2), (4), (9) ספר שמופץ בימין מסביר מתי מותר להרוג "גויים"
(3), (6), (8), (13), (14), (15), (44), (58) Settler Rabbi publishes "The complete guide to killing non-Jews"
(5), (10), (11), (29), (43) Settler rabbi authors guidelines on killing gentiles
(7) The Noachian Laws
(12) Zionist Rabbi Calls for Killing of Even Non-Jewish Children and Infants if They Pose a 'Threat' to Israel'Threat'%20to%20Israel.htm
(16) Israel Koenig, the Koenig Memorandum
(17) Rafael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defence Forces, 1983
(18) Declaration of Establishment of State of Israel
(19), (21), (32), (57) Al- Awda PRRC
(20) Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aharonot, July 14, 1972,
(22) Massive Online Encyclopedia of Islam Hyper-linked to the Qur'an, Hadiths, Taurat, Injil and other sources
(23) Webster's Encyclopaedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, p. 767.
(24) Merriam-Webster's Online dictionary
(25), (26), (27) A Dictionary of Islam by Thomas Patrick Hughes, London, 1895, pp. 243-248
(28), (36), (37), (56) Religious fundamentalism in Israel
(33) Jewish Forum and Discussions – Chabad Talk
(34) 1994: Jewish settler kills 30 at holy site
(35), (39), (40) Top Yesha rabbi says Jewish law forbids renting houses to Arabs
(38) Dov Lior
(41) Rabbi: Older bachelors must leave Jerusalem,7340,L-3709700,00.html
(42) Shas rabbi's son: No afterlife for Federman farm destroyers,2506,L-3617393,00.html
(45) What is Anti-Semitism?
(46) Jewish Banker Paul Warburg's testimony before the U.S. Senate, February 17, 1950
(47), (48), (49), (50), (60), (61), (62) Book advocating killing gentiles who endanger Jews is hard to come by
(51) Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, pp. 19-20
(52) Samuel, p. 22
(53) Samuel, pp. 22, 23
(54) Samuel, p. 155
(55) Jeff Gates, Guilt by Association: How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War. Santa Barbara: State Street Publications, 2008, p. 139.
(59) Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, ed. A. Schenker. Stuttgart: C. H. Beck, Nördingen, 1997 p. 1426.

*Anait Brutian (B. Mus. with Honours in Theory, McGill University; M. A. in Music Theory, McGill University) is a student in the Faculty of Religious Studies at McGill. Her previous research includes a self-published book entitled: Reconciling Geometry, Rhetoric and Harmony: A Fresh Look at C. P. E. Bach. She is currently working on another book on mathematical paradigms in literature (Old and New Testaments), art, architecture, and music.


  1. Noor,

    Good article though I've one reservation: By mentioning the word ZIONISTS, the title condemns and dishonors the meaning of the word "JIHAD", which is misunderstood and condemned in the WEST as a result of the Zionists propaganda. You know what does the word JIHAD means in its broader and narrower meaning where neither in both it befits Zionism's evil.


  2. Re: The Ugly Face of the Zionist Jihad


    Your comments are completely justifiable with one reservation. As you have already witnessed, the word “Jihad” was given as thorough a treatment as the length of the paper allowed, and this treatment was more inclined towards a historical interpretation of the word, which is distinct from its modern-day, Zionist-motivated derogatory meaning. Noam Chomsky uses the word in relation to Dershowitz’ unfair treatment of Norman Finkelstein (Chomsky on Dershowitz' "jihad" against Finkelstein Part 1
    Chomsky on Dershowitz' "jihad" against Finkelstein Part 2 After the historical explanation of the word, I tried to present – to use your words the Western “misunderstood and condemned” version but this time in relation to the Zionists. There are deep-seated misrepresentations in the West that deliberately distort the original meaning of words in order to serve the political agenda of a criminal group. If the sober-minded minority of the population is ever to succeed, these words, in their distorted sense, MUST be used to describe the Zionist activity. Please read my other papers on Zionism at:

    Anait Brutian

    The Truth

    Anait Brutian

  3. Hello,
    Please have a look at the recent papers I posted on my Blog (
    These are the links:
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 1*
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 2*
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 3*
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 4*
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 5*
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 6*
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 7*
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 8*
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 9*

    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 10*
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 11*
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 12*
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 13*
    The Ominous Vortex of Illuminism – Part 14

    Anait Brutian (


If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.