Wednesday 19 August 2009


I decided to stay at home to support my partner in a domestic fashion and raise our kids. Teach them standards they would not get if the state raised them. Someone tell those feminazis that this isn’t backsliding ~ I am socially conscious and making my own decisions.

Once again, Henry Macow has proven why he has been a favourite blogger of mine for several years. Henry's specialty is feminism, gender confusion, and how they fit into the agenda of the New World Order. It is interesting to find this piece of his just after my work on pornography the other day. Over the years, Henry's ideas and words opened my eyes to the overall plans of these creatures in ways I had never even thought possible. Especially when I learned about Betty Friedan and her ilk.

“They invent ways of doing evil.” (Book of Romans 1:30)
by Henry Makow
August 14, 2009
A smoking gun!
The elite doesn't want us to reproduce. 
In 1970, Frederick Jaffe, the VP of Rockefeller-sponsored "Planned Parenthood" organization outlined how "social constraints" should be used to achieve "fertility control." ("Family Planning Perspectives" Oct.1970.) 
These "constraints" included encouraging "increased homosexuality," altering "the image of the ideal family," and encouraging women to work outside the home.

If this failed, the agency recommended the placement of "fertility control agents in the water supply." We're not talking about unwanted pregnancies here. 
The unprecedented decline of the American family since 1960 did not take place by accident. We are victims of a campaign of psychological warfare carried out by the CIA and foundations through the media, government and education
They put the neutering agent in the cultural drinking water. The main ingredient is the promotion of homosexuality as an alternative to heterosexuality.

The slutty Bratz dolls for girls embraces their inner slut at a very tender age.

Feminism, which masquerades as "woman's rights," is in fact a pathological lesbian movement. It coerces women to believe that their feminine instincts are socially taught, oppressive and evil. It teaches them to fear and compete with men, and to find fulfillment in career instead of family.

Women who devote their lives to their families are the finest aspects of human life. They bring love and beauty into the world and tend to the real everyday needs of men and children. To disparage these women is a foul, vicious calumny worthy of the devil himself. Yet that's what the feminist movement is all about, though they deny it. 
Betty Frieden, Jew, the "moderate" feminist founder, who hid the fact that she was a Communist activist, compared homemakers to concentration camp victims.
Simone de Beauvoir, another Communist founder, said women must not be given a choice to be mothers and homemakers because they'll choose that option.

According to feminist Ellen Willis, feminism "is the cutting edge of a revolution in cultural and moral values...The objective of every feminist reform, from legal child-care programs, is to undermine traditional family values." (The Nation, Nov. 14, 1981)
What part of traditional family values do feminists object to? Love? Sacrifice? Devotion? Loyalty? Security? The preparation of a new generation for life?
Rockefeller financed the Nazis through I.G. Farben. He sponsored the American Eugenics Society that had close links to its Nazi counterpart. 
Rockefeller financed Alfred Kinsey, the homosexual pederast whose "Kinsey Report" replaced married love with casual sex. 

Rockefeller continues to finance "Women's Studies" which is a training ground for fascist zealots who spread their poison in society as "change agents." (See Daphne Patai, Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies.) 

The elite is promoting homosexuality to bring about a fascist New World Order. Homosexuality is a developmental disorder characterized by a failure to bond with a member of the opposite sex.

A group of the girls at a gay rally. I know they are tempting morsels of femininity so, down boys, down! A few of these lovelies can be found in the piece  
Lesbianism (feminism) which coerces women to be like men (and vice-versa) makes it difficult to achieve such a bond.
As a result, millions of men and women have been defrauded of happiness and suffer the same symptoms as homosexuals, i.e. arrested development, and obsession with sex. 
The elite's purpose is to transfer power from the nation state to their minions at the world level.
Once our democratic power is gone,
the elite will lower the standard of living.

Look at the economic disparities in the
Third World for a blueprint of the future.

For the elite, the motto is
"the less there is of you, the more there is for us."

A distracted, dysfunctional population,
deprived of its history and culture,
will not recognize its fate in time
Boys' Bratz dolls. How masculine are these wimpy little boys?

Men, emasculated and demoralized, will not be able to resist.


I ran headlong into this stealth elite policy when I was teaching English part-time at the University of Winnipeg. I was exploring the subject of male-female love in works by DH Lawrence, Chekhov and Henry James. 
A handful of militant feminists objected to my defense of traditional femininity and wrote a letter slandering me. Constance Rooke, the university president, [now deceased] accepted their allegations without investigation.
The university ignored my complaint of discrimination. The Manitoba Human Rights Commission, another feminist bastion, also dismissed my complaint without investigation. 

Winnipeg Sun Editor Lyn Cockburn portrayed me as a 50-year-old man who got his jollies by importuning his 18-year-old female students after class with questions about their sex lives.
She compared me to a MD who should be disbarred for making "inappropriate remarks and gestures" to a young female patient. I sued The Winnipeg Sun for defamation and won. 

Vile slander is the lot of anyone who questions feminist dogma. Professors were afraid to speak to me. 

This case is not about protecting innocence.
Last year, Cockburn had nothing to say when the same university was on the front page of The Winnipeg Sun for teaching lesbian masturbation to 14-year-old high school girls.
The girls signed on for a summer school course on "women in the arts" and received an introduction to lesbianism instead.
They learned that they didn't need men and could use bananas and vegetables. President Rooke was unrepentant and opined that it may have been too soon to teach girls about male substitutes.

Normally Rooke would have lost her job for this outrage. But there wasn't a peep from the Minister of Education or other stalwarts of the community. Rooke is brazen because her orders come right from the top

This became clear when I saw Jim Carr, the executive director of the Manitoba Business Council. I thought the province's leading enterprises would be concerned that feminists teach the hatred of males, the overthrow of capitalism and discrimination in favor of women, minorities and homosexuals. 

He denied this is happening. Carr's previous assignment was biographer of Duff Roblin. A former Manitoba Premier, Roblin is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (the elite's US coordinating body.) 

Hartley Richardson, a longtime leader of the Manitoba business community, is a member of the Trilateral Commission. Rockefeller interests set up these bodies to promote elite world government and (Canadian PM) Stephen Harper and (Manitoba Premier) Gary Doer dance to their tunes.

Open this thumb for Obama's take on gay marriage. At the President's Easter party, an annual White House event, this year for the first time, gay parents were in the party.

In conclusion, elite planners and their stooges (in government, education and the media) are actively promoting homosexuality in order to destabilize and neuter us. Their ultimate goal is to steal our birthright, in every sense of the word.


  1. Feminism is a form of Communism. It is the antithesis of Fascism. Please refrain from calling the minions of Communism "Fascists." It unintentionally insults the right wing who support your views.

    Other than that, your article was excellent.

  2. Communism and Fascism are two sides of the same coin. The previous posted is the product of public schooling which says Communism is "far left" and Fascism is "far right" when in reality these graphs make absolutely no sense. Libertarianism and anarchy are placed right next to Communism, while Monarchism is placed next to Fascism.

    Let me spell it out for you. Fascism is an invention of the Vatican, root word Faces. While Communism was yet another strategy to conquer the world, this time through Zionism and the chosen slaves. It dates back to the 1700s and has nothing what so ever to do with ideology. The end (NWO) justifies the means.

  3. A lot of misinformation going on in this article. If a woman is given a choice to be a homemaker as opposed to having the same opportunities as men, (parenthood and career) she may very well be exercising critical thinking skills if she chooses to not become financially dependent by staying at home to raise a family. We are still living in well oiled patriarchal system. If she dedicates herself to her family, disregards education, etc., and her partner experiences the common 'Coolidge Effect', then she's in a heap of a mess, which is why women and children experience the most poverty. I advise that you read the history on how 'family' and 'marriage' came to be and why. If you think it was to protect women and children you are sorely misinformed. Patriarchy made the job of care giving the least respected position in society, and the most underpaid job 'free labor'. Financial dependance on her partner is a nail in the coffin in our culture. Motherhood was cursed in the Bible, Gen. 3:16. Marriage became a form of legal slavery "husband shall have the rule over you". Without care giving our brains would not be properly wired, so care giving should be a respected position to hold. Care giving and nurturing should be undertaken by both parents and the community. The Dalai Lama stated that women will save the world. I concur. They naturally have more hemispheric integration.

    Planned Parenthood? 7 billion people on this planet - a wake-up call. Feminism? It would have never been birthed had men actually not been deceived by their own cultures and followed patriarchal, dopamine addicted masters. They also became addicted to their own neurochemistry by partaking in the dopaminergic illusion of having power over another. Feminism didn't teach women to compete with men. As a general rule, due to cultural ideologies of what manhood is, men were taught by other men to be combative and competitive even if it meant suppression of 1/2 the species. Google 'Peace Among Primates', regarding Forrest Troop Baboons, and perhaps you will gain a better understanding of cultural conditioning that is not innate. Carl Sagan stated that a species/organism that wars against itself is doomed. There should have never been the 'battle of the sexes'. Imagine if men had said in the first place "yes - you deserve the same opportunities and human rights we we do". You've got some decent musings on this blog but lack hemispheric integration,imo, thus awareness. I also think you are homophobic and feed into the ignorance and hatred that is so prevalent. Fear in disguise?


If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.