Let us also remember that, by the time Britain entered its age of imperialistic colonialism, the Jews had fully integrated into the upper levels of society and wielded great power and used it towards the advancement of their great plan for the Jewish (Newish) World Order.
The following is from one of those Britons tasked with infiltrating foreign countries for the advancement of the East India Country, feeding the rapacious appetites of the rulers of Britain, all intent on the bringing about of their NWO. From CONFESSIONS OF A BRITISH SPY
Our Great Britain is very vast. The sun rises over its seas, and sets, again, below its seas. Our State is relatively weak yet in its colonies in India, China and Middle East. These countries are not entirely under our domination. However, we have been carrying on a very active and successful policy in these places. We shall be in full possession of all of them very soon. Two things are of importance:1- To try to retain the places we have already obtained;2- To try to take possession of those places we have not obtained yet.The Ministry of Colonies assigned a commission from each of the colonies for the execution of these two tasks. As soon as I entered the Ministry of Colonies, the Minister put his trust in me and appointed me the administrator of the company of East India. Outwardly it was a company of trade. But its real task was to search for ways of taking control of the very vast lands of India.Our government was not at all nervous about India. India was a country where people from various nationalities, speaking different languages, and having contrasting interests lived together. Nor were we afraid of China. For the religions dominant in China were Buddhism and Confucianism, neither of which was much of a threat. Both of them were dead religions that instituted no concern for life and which were no more than forms of addresses.For this reason, the people living in these two countries were hardly likely to have any feelings of patriotism. These two countries did not worry us, the British government. Yet the events that might occur later were not out of consideration for us. Therefore, we were designing long term plans to wage discord, ignorance, poverty, and even diseases in these countries. We were imitating the customs and traditions of these two countries, thus easily concealing our intentions.
The British Empire was involved in:
The drugs trade (Dope Inc),
False flag terror,
And institutionalized racism.
(1) To use a double-agent Francis Millen to organize a 'plot' to blow up Westminster Abbey, thus killing Queen Victoria and half the British cabinet.
(2) To have the plot discovered and revealed during Queen Victoria's golden jubilee. The Jubilee plot employed two Irish-American patsies, Thomas Callan and Michael Harkins.
Professor Linda Colley, of Princeton University (The British Empire) points out that Argentina, for example, "was substantially run by the British during the 19th century."
AND "THE US remained economically and culturally dependent on the empire for much of the 19th century."
IN ARGENTINA, the British set up railroads and made them "serve British commercial interests" and the British "dominated the banks and investment structure".
IN EUROPE, "naval bases such as Menorca, Gibraltar, Cyprus and Malta allowed the Royal Navy to control the Mediterranean for a very long time."
Professor John MacKenzie, of Lancaster University, points out that the Irish, Welsh and Scots were important. (The British Empire)
The Irish contributed priests, nuns, doctors and generals to the Empire.
"An obvious Irish contribution was Roman Catholicism and... the Irish... were disproportionately powerful within the British army."
Within the Empire, "many of the universities were founded by Scots on the Scottish model.
"In addition, Scotland was an over producer of graduates so you had very many Scottish doctors, engineers, foresters, botanists and teachers... There were Scots everywhere.
"Whenever you had mines established around the empire, it was often Welsh or Cornish who inhabited them."
Dr Sheryllynne Haggerty, of the University of Nottingham, points out that "some merchants were involved in the slave trade, which was integral to the growing of sugar and tobacco in the colonies." (The British Empire)
Professor Maya Jasanoff, of Harvard University, points out that when the USA ceased to be part of the empire, "it remained incredibly closely tied to Britain right up to the Civil War, and in some ways even beyond that.
"Economically both countries were dependent on the other and the United States was the main trading partner for Britain.
"It was also the chief destination for British emigrants.
"So when we think of the British Empire as a global entity bound together by trade, emigration, and cultural ties, we should remember the ways in which the USA remained involved."
5. India was of prime importance to the British economy. (The British Empire)
Professor Denis Judd, of New York University in London, points out that
"Britain was the world’s first superpower because of her flying start in the industrial revolution, her financial and manufacturing domination, her enormous wealth, her stable political institutions, the global supremacy of the Royal Navy and her huge worldwide empire."
"There was a large annual balance in Britain's favour.
India's railways provided "a good minimum percentage return for British investors."
India's soldiers were "a readily available source of manpower for the exercise of British foreign policy, and at no cost to the British taxpayer."
In the 1850s, opium revenues accounted for more than 20 per cent of British government revenues in India.
6. Opium helped bankroll the British Empire. (The British Empire)
Dr Julia Lovell, of Birkbeck University of London, points out that the opium trade was "crucial to the running of the British empire."
Opium was grown in India.
The British forced the Chinese to buy the opium.
The 1860 Beijing treaty, after two Opium Wars, forced China to make opium legal.
The profits of the opium were used to buy tea.
The tea was sold in Britain.
The government got its customs duties.
"These duties paid for a large part of the Royal Navy, so opium helped keep the British Empire afloat."
The Opium Wars looked like a conspiracy to undermine China.
Sir Stamford Raffles, of the East India Company, brought death and destruction to Java in Indonesia. He sacked and looted cities. He supported slavery. He promoted the trade in Opium.
Professor Huw Bowen, of Swansea University, writes that "one would assume that Britain grew richer and the rest of empire got poorer because the whole point of empires is that they are exploitative."
"To assume that everything the British did was damaging is incorrect.
"British enterprise stimulated a large export trade which might otherwise never have come into existence."
"However, there is no doubt that in the long run specific sectors of the Indian economy did suffer under the yoke of imperialism ~ the cotton industry was profoundly damaged by cheap imports from Lancashire and Scotland from the 1830s onwards."
According to Professor Peter Marshall, of King's College London, "a sense of a common British identity was very strong in the later 19th century, particularly among people of British origin in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and English-speaking South Africa."
These countries contributed soldiers in two world wars.
"People in the Caribbean as well as mixed-race people in southern Africa or the elites in India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka could have a strong sense of British values."
These Jamaicans "were dismayed by what they regarded as the un-British standards that they encountered in Britain."
In Britain, "attitudes of condescension towards all imperial peoples and downright racism towards non-Europeans were very common."
Dr Sarah Stockwell, of King's College London, points out that "continued attachment to empire through the 1940s and 50s may have had an adverse effect on the British economy.
"It contributed to Britain's initial decision not to join the European Economic Community at its foundation in 1957, while some British businesses also remained focused on traditional markets that were increasingly less important to the country than those in Europe."
Mark Curtis says that in 1971 an official British investigation found that the British army's torture techniques "played an important part in counter-insurgency operations in Palestine, Malaya, Kenya, Cyprus and the British Cameroons (1960-1), Brunei (1963), British Guiana (1964), Aden (1964-7), Borneo/Malaysia (1965-6), the Persian Gulf (1970-1) and in Northern Ireland (1971)".
In 1943, millions of people were dying of starvation in Bengal, in India.
The UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill could easily have stopped the famine by arranging a few shipments of food.
He also prevented others from helping.
Winston Churchill described the Indians as "a beastly people with a beastly religion." (Churchill's Secret War)
He said they "bred like rabbits."
Famine in India ~ Website for this image
32 Whites were killed by the Mau Mau during the five-year state of emergency. More whites died in traffic accidents in the capital city, Nairobi.
Kenyans were forced into concentration camps and routinely tortured. Some 150,000 Africans died as a direct result of the British policy.
There was a "constant stream of reports of brutalities by police, military and home guards", wrote Canon Bewes, a British missionary. "Some of the people had been using castration instruments and two men had died under castration."
Other brutalities included slicing off ears, boring holes in eardrums, flogging people to death, pouring paraffin over suspects and setting them alight and burning eardrums with cigarettes.A British district officer admitted, "There was outright abuse of power and some of the crimes committed were horrific. One day six Mau Mau suspects were brought into a police station in the neighbouring district to mine. The British police inspector in charge lined them up against a wall and shot them."
A mobile gallows travelled the country. Over 1,000 were hanged, their bodies displayed at crossroads and market places.
British concentration camp in Kenya.
The British used terror in Malaya.
This involved aerial bombing, massacres of villagers, dictatorial police measures and the "resettlement" of hundreds of thousands of people.
During the state of emergency, from 1952 to 1957, the British army used torture.
Cypriot Nicos Koshies:
"They took me to the Special Branch and they started beating me. They took off all my clothes, they tied my hands and feet. They asked somebody to come in. He was taking a stick to put up my bottom, he was putting cloths in water and putting them on my face so I could not breathe, he threw me down and danced on my stomach when he was wearing boots. After 12 days I could not recognize myself."
James Callaghan in the House of Commons:
"On 29 June 1957 an inquest was held into the death of Nicos Georghiou. Dr Clearkin said in evidence that bruises in the head were sufficiently severe to have caused the injuries to the brain, perhaps bumping the head against a hard object."
British concentration camp in South Africa
In Aden, later known as South Yemen, SAS squads used terror against local villages.
An official investigation found that from 1964 to 1967 detainees at a British interrogation centre were routinely tortured. Their eardrums were burst.
Others were forced to lean against walls with their fingertips for day and subjected to white noise for hours.
ED: At these South African camps, the Boers were given minimal sustenance, if any at all but were penned in. The Blacks were fed nothing and expected to forage from the wilds themselves.
Former detainees in Bahrain have described being beaten, electrocuted, whipped, tied in excruciating positions for days on end, kept awake, starved and having their toenails torn out.
The Compton official inquiry acknowledged that the army hooded suspects, fed them on just bread and water and blasted them with noise.
An Amnesty International report said, "It is because we regard the deliberate destruction of a man's ability to control his own mind with revulsion that we reserve a special place in our catalogue of moral crimes for techniques of thought control and brainwashing. Any interrogation procedure which has the purpose or effect of causing a malfunction or breakdown of a man's mental processes constitutes as grave an assault on the inherent dignity of the human person as more traditional techniques of physical torture."
A European human rights report found that British army techniques amounted to "inhuman and degrading treatment" causing "at least intense physical and mental suffering".